Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-26 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi, Thanks for bringing this up. We are doing a thorough review of the licenses for all files in the source [1] and will finish that first before rc2. Best, Sheng [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/19427 On 2020/10/21 22:23:20, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Re the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-22 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Thanks, Justin. After removing stale issues and adding the statement on GPU > license, assuming we address any other license issue in the next rc, should > we name it as simply DISCLAIMER instead of DISCLAIMER-WIP? When all issue have been resolved then I would name it DISCLAIMER,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-22 Thread Sheng Zha
Thanks, Justin. After removing stale issues and adding the statement on GPU license, assuming we address any other license issue in the next rc, should we name it as simply DISCLAIMER instead of DISCLAIMER-WIP? I thought it should be the case and just want to confirm. Best, Sheng On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-22 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi Justin, I reviewed the open items in INCUBATOR-253 and didn't find issue that impacts source code release. Let me know if you feel differently on any of those items. Best, Sheng On 2020/10/21 22:38:50, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > Is there anything from the known issues in [1] that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Let’s discuss outside the immediate context of MxNet reasons for the IPMC to > suspend a podling. Sure, it would be best to start a seperate thread for that. I think however it would be so infrequent and each situation different that it would be hard to come up with some that would work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Dave Fisher
Sure. We still need to define suspension. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> If NVIDIA changes the license then it must be very soon. If so then the >> issue is gone. > > And the issue may not be gone unless the license

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > If NVIDIA changes the license then it must be very soon. If so then the issue > is gone. And the issue may not be gone unless the license change is retroactive. Currently the project has maven artefacts in the Apache repo that contain category X code. [1] Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - Let’s discuss outside the immediate context of MxNet reasons for the IPMC to suspend a podling. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 21, 2020, at 8:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> Don’t make a noncompliant binary release. > > The project is (sadly) already doing this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Don’t make a noncompliant binary release. The project is (sadly) already doing this [1], they are hoping the licensing issue can be sorted, but its taken more than 5 months and little visible progress on that seems to have been done. NVIDIA is considering changing, but to what we don’t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 21, 2020, at 7:31 PM, Sheng Zha wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions of the > resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked issues, all of > them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, Is there anything from the known issues in [1] that needs to be added? Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Sam Skalicky
Regarding the disclaimer issues, I have reviewed the 3 issues called out in the disclaimer and found that they have all been resolved. Here is a PR [1] to update the disclaimer and add the additional language describing the licensing incompatibility when building for GPU with Nvidia licensed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Re the licensed files missing from LICENSE here are some examples[1][2][3][4], but I haven’t done a full check so there are probably more. Thanks, Justin 1. ./3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party/pybind11/tests/test_gil_scoped.cpp 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread kheafiel
Hi,     I'm the author of one of the 3rd party libraries, intgemm, that is new in 1.8.  It is MIT licensed but also includes catch for testing under Boost.  MXNet doesn't compile my tests. https://github.com/kpu/intgemm/blob/master/LICENSE     In

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions of the > resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked issues, all of > them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a blocking issue if the actual > issues that the DISCLAIMER-WIP links to are addressed?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-21 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi Justin, Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions of the resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked issues, all of them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a blocking issue if the actual issues that the DISCLAIMER-WIP links to are addressed?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 (binding) Please see [1] and note which sort of issues need to be fixed before making a new release. While it does include the WIP declaimers, it includes several knows issues that have been outstanding for several releases. It also fails to mention teh issue with Nvidia licensing and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-15 Thread Sheng Zha
+1 carrying my vote from dev. On 2020/10/13 05:40:32, "Skalicky, Sam" wrote: > Dear community, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.8.0, release > candidate 1. > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote thread: >

[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

2020-10-13 Thread Skalicky, Sam
Dear community, This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.8.0, release candidate 1. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread: