Hi,
> thanks a lot for the comments and keeping us honest. I want to make sure we
> are on the same page: do you see these issues as critical or they can be
> addressed in the consequent release?
Next release is fine by me.
Thanks,
Justin
Justin,
thanks a lot for the comments and keeping us honest. I want to make sure
we are on the same page: do you see these issues as critical or they can
be addressed in the consequent release?
Thanks,
On 2020-05-05 06:02, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Fixed in master. However, there are
Hi,
> Fixed in master. However, there are still questions on hoThw NOTICE file
> should look like for binary releases.
Generally the way that is handles is too have seperate NOTICE (and LICENSE)
files one for teh source release and one for the binary convienance.
> These are the model files
Justin,
Thank you for noticing this. See below...
--
Aaron Radzinski
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> I know the vote has all ready passed but I can see a couple of issues
> here:
> - LICENSE is missing the appendix
>
Fixed in master.
- As noted the NOTICE is
HI,
I know the vote has all ready passed but I can see a couple of issues here:
- LICENSE is missing the appendix
- As noted the NOTICE is not correct. License are not lined in NOTICE they are
licensed in LICENSE and need to be the full text. Dependancies don’t need to be
listed only that that
Hi,
The vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.5.0 has passed with 3 +1
binding votes.
Binding votes are:
- Paul King
- Furkan KAMACI
- Konstantin Boudnik
Vote thread:
Hi,
+1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE should be fixed (which is a minor issue)
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked Checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
- Apache
+1 (binding)
Checked:
+ DISCLAIMER exists
+ incubating in name
+ no unexpected binary files
+ signature okay (from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS)
+ checksum okay
+ LICENSE okay
+ NOTICE lines 1-5 correct (remove lines 6-95 for next release, they aren't
+1 [binding]
Checked
- signatures
- license compliance
- checksums
Thank you.
--
Cos
On 2020-04-23 12:52, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
Hello all,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version
0.5.0.
The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal
Got it, thanks for clearing that up.
Best,
--
Nikita Ivanov
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:46 PM Paul King wrote:
> Okay, I didn't know that wording was there. Standard practice is to always
> wait at least 72hrs unless there are exceptional circumstances such as:
> * cancelling the vote early
Okay, I didn't know that wording was there. Standard practice is to always
wait at least 72hrs unless there are exceptional circumstances such as:
* cancelling the vote early when it needs an obvious fix
* when there is a security issue in the release which needs prompt releasing
* the entire PMC
Paul - this is the language that's proposed as a template in
https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases
Thanks,
--
Nikita Ivanov
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:04 AM Paul King wrote:
> Just on process, the "or until a necessary number of votes are reached"
> won't apply. You
Just on process, the "or until a necessary number of votes are reached"
won't apply. You might get 3 +1s straight away and a -1 a couple of days
later. If that was the total votes, that would still be counted as a
failing vote.
Cheers, Paul.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:52 PM Aaron Radzinski
Hello all,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version
0.5.0.
The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) version 0.5.0. We would like to
request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
14 matches
Mail list logo
