Hello All,
We are glad to announce that vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(incubating) 1.0.0 has passed with following results:
+1 binding : 3 (Jean-Baptiste Onofre, Timothy Chen, Willem Jiang)
Vote Thread :
Hello All,
This vote is closed now, we will be publishing the results shortly.
Thank you all for your participation.
Regards
Asif
On 2018/07/28 17:50:17, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
>
+1 binding as well.
Tim
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:58 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Casting my vote here.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 28/07/2018 19:50, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
>
+1 (binding)
Casting my vote here.
Regards
JB
On 28/07/2018 19:50, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
> (Incubating) version 1.0.0
>
> Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the
Just forward my +1 (binding) vote from d...@servicecomb.apache.org.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
Hello All,
This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(Incubating) version 1.0.0
Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release.
Vote Thread :
Hello All,
We are glad to announce that vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(incubating) 1.0.0-m2 has passed with following results:
+1 binding : 3 (Willem Jiang, Luke Han, Mick Semb Wever)
Vote Thread :
Hello All,
This vote is closed now, we will publish the results shortly.
Thanks All for the participation in this vote.
Regards
Asif
On 2018/06/12 08:36:01, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
> Voting will start now(Tuesday, 12th June, 2018) and will remain open for
> next 72 hours, Request all IPMC members to give their vote.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.0.0-m2
> [ ] +0 No Opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
+1 binding
+1 binding
Mohammad Asif Siddiqui 于2018年6月20日周三 上午12:40写道:
> Hello All IPMC Members,
>
> This vote is open from last 6 days, please help us to verify and vote for
> this release.
>
> Regards
> Asif
>
> On 2018/06/12 08:36:01, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
> wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > This is a call
Hello All IPMC Members,
This vote is open from last 6 days, please help us to verify and vote for this
release.
Regards
Asif
On 2018/06/12 08:36:01, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
>
+1 (binding)
Carrying my vote over form the dev list.
For the source code I checked:
1. File name with incubating
2. Signed key and sha file are OK
3. License and Notice file is good
4. RAT check OK
5. DISCLAME file is there
6. No other code in the vendor directory
For the binary I checked:
1.
Hello All,
This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(Incubating) version 1.0.0-m2.
Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release
Vote Thread :
Hi All,
We are glad to announce that vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(incubating) 1.0.0-m1 has passed with following results:
+1 binding : 4 (Willem Jiang, Justin Mclean, Roman Shaposhnik, Jean-Baptiste
Onofré )
Vote Thread :
+1 (binding)
Checked:
- Build
- Signatures and headers
- DISCLAIMER is there
- LICENSE & NOTICE ok
Regards
JB
On 03/20/2018 05:24 AM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
> (Incubating) version 1.0.0-m1
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:24 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
> (Incubating) version 1.0.0-m1
> Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name includes incubating
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE all good
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile form source
Thanks,
Justin
-
To
Here is my +1 (binding)
I did below checks:
Checked the signed Keys and checksum.
Checked the binary with the examples.
Run the rat to verify the License header issue.
DISCLAIMER exists
Compiled from source
Checked for archive matching git tag
Willem Jiang
Blog:
Hello All,
This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(Incubating) version 1.0.0-m1
Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release.
Vote Thread :
Hi All,
We are Cancelling this vote as there are some issue we need to handle related
to LICENSE and NOTICE file.
We have fixed these issues and we will re-intiate a seperate VOTE Thread for
second release candidate.
Thanks all for your support.
Regards
Asif
On
Hi Justin,
We did quick fix for the ServiceCenter LICENSE and NOTICE issue.
You can find the LICENSE[1] and NOTICE[2] in the src release,
LICENSE[3] and NOTICE[4] in the binary release.
Please let us know if those files are OK.
If everything is OK, We will start a new vote for the ServiceComb
FYI, you can find the LICENSE and NOTICE file of the ServiceComb Service
Center here[1][2].
I just create a JIRA[3] to fix the LICENSE and NOTICE file issue in Service
Center.
We will provide different LICENSE and NOTICE for src and binary releases.
Hi,
> I just checked the code of servicecomb-website, we keep the js and fonts
> into the repo, so we should treat the repo as source release but the source
> has the bundled items (js, and fonts).
AFAICS these are not bundled in the source release (well not for the one put up
to vote on) and I
Hi,
> The NOTICE file you just point is for the servicecomb-website (which is
> build by), not for the other servicecomb sub project.
> As we just publish the website in apache, I'm not sure if the website is
> kind of release. If we treat it as a source release, I guess we don't need to
>
Hi Justin
I just checked the code of servicecomb-website, we keep the js and fonts
into the repo, so we should treat the repo as source release but the source
has the bundled items (js, and fonts).
I guess the License statements[1] should be fine, please let me know if I
miss anything.
For the
Hi Justin,
Thanks for pointing out the NOTICE file issue. I think we messed the usage
of NOTICE and License file. It looks put the License files in the License
directory could be a good way.
The NOTICE file you just point is for the servicecomb-website (which is
build by), not for the other
Hi.,
For those not wanting to download the release and unpack it, here's the current
NOTICE file [1]
You’ll note it contains permissive license information (which should be in the
license file), links to web sites rather than pointers to license text (license
information can change over time
Hi,
> "* We can do a minor improvement on the NOTICE formating”
IMO It needs more than minor improvements/changes, it's not just a formatting
issue.
That being said no -1 vote is a veto if you get 3 +1 votes from other IPMC
members then it’s a release.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Justin,
I mentioned this in my vote:
"* We can do a minor improvement on the NOTICE formating"
The content looks OK to me, but not in the right place/formating. I didn't
consider this as blocker (as it's there, even if not super accurate) and we can
fix in the next cycle, but I got your
Hi,
> I just checked some projects Notice file, it looks like some projects[1][2]
> list the License information about the third party dependencies in the
> Notice file
Which would be incorrect to do so. What you are seeing here in the Hadoop case
is an upstream project have extra information
Hi Justin
Thanks for the vote, here is some thing that I want to clear about the
NOTICE file.
I just checked some projects Notice file, it looks like some projects[1][2]
list the License information about the third party dependencies in the
Notice file, and some of them[3] just list bundled
Hi,
-1 (binding) as there is incorrect and far too much information in NOTICE.
License information goes in LICENSE not NOTICE. [1] Also only things that are
actually bundled need to be mentioned not dependancies. [2]
BTW it's not entirely clear which of the releases artefacts are source
+1 binding
Reviewed license and release artifacts / signatures.
Tim
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Reviewed:
> * build from src
> * ASF headers
> * checksum and signatures
> * DISCLAIMER
> * License is OK
> * We can do a minor
+1 (binding)
Reviewed:
* build from src
* ASF headers
* checksum and signatures
* DISCLAIMER
* License is OK
* We can do a minor improvement on the NOTICE formating
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 02/28/2018 02:25 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is a call for vote to release
+1 non-binding
Checks done;
1. Built release from source on Linux.
2. Test basic functionalities of front end release in chrome.
Thanks & Regards
-Mahesh Raju
On 2018/03/01 10:44:17, savita3020 ashture wrote:
> +1 non-binding.>
>
>
> Here are the checks which I did:>
> 1. Built release from
+1 non-binding.
Here are the checks which I did:
1. Built release from source on Linux and Windows.
2. Ran sample java chassis demos using sc release to test the basic
communication.
Regards.
Savita
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018, 8:20 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
>
+1 binding.
Here are the checks those I did
* Build from the src
* Apache-rat check[1]
* KEYS is good
* the checksum and signed info is right
* License and NOTICE
* Commit is published
* DISCLAIMER is in the src and binary kits.
[1]https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-
Hello All,
This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(Incubating) version 1.0.0-m1.
Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release.
Vote Thread:
38 matches
Mail list logo