On 3 September 2014 06:21, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any
previous version up accidentally. This is
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any
previous version up
Jake,
Thanks for clarifying. To echo the other sentiments already pointed out,
when I look at those you listed (Cassandra in particular), I notice that
they seem to vote for every single release, even if it's a repackage of an
existing RC. This is from traversing a couple months worth of their
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
release candidates and make it
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:29 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave
Does that mean that the TAG for usergrid-1.0.0 is the exact same
as that for RC4??
Recall that a released codebase must be directly tracked
to a specific SVN tag in our repo.
On Sep 3, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:29 AM, John D. Ament
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:29 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
So - just to confirm. If I look at
apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the
pom.xml files will read the version 1.0.0-rc5 and the git tag will also
read 1.0.0-rc5 then after you do an
On 3 September 2014 17:26, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
So - just to confirm. If I look at
apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the
pom.xml files will read the version 1.0.0-rc5
On 3 September 2014 16:26, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
So - just to confirm. If I look at
apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the
pom.xml files will read the version 1.0.0-rc5 and
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 September 2014 16:26, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
So - just to confirm. If I look at
apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz
Release files are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/usergrid/usergrid-1/v1.0.0/
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
The Usergrid project has prepared a release candidate (RC4) and has voted
to release it as Apache
Hi Dave!
So, I started looking around and I don't think NOTICE is properly
documented - there are lots of things that would seem to require
notice that aren't there.
portal/node_modules/bower/node_modules/update-notifier/node_modules/chalk
Chalk, for instance doesn't appear to be documented
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi Dave!
So, I started looking around and I don't think NOTICE is properly
documented - there are lots of things that would seem to require
notice that aren't there.
I'm wondering if they should just exclude node_modules from their release.
It's more like an external dependency, typically excluded from releases.
There are also many binary images in the source release, not expected.
I agree, the notice file is not correct. For example, NUnit shows as
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:09 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, your release vote is for RC4. Please vote on your PPMC for 1.0
first.
I don't see why that is necessary. We already voted to release Usergrid 1.0
on the PPMC list.
- Dave
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm wondering if they should just exclude node_modules from their release.
It's more like an external dependency, typically excluded from releases.
There are also many binary images in the source release, not
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm wondering if they should just exclude node_modules from their
release.
It's more like an external dependency, typically excluded from releases.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:09 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, your release vote is for RC4. Please vote on your PPMC for 1.0
first.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:20 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:09 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any
previous version up accidentally. This is very common and currently done in
many TLP's including Thrift, Mesos, and Cassandra to name a few.
-Jake
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any
previous version up accidentally. This is very common and currently done in
many TLP's including Thrift,
On 02.09.2014 23:06, Dave wrote:
Rats. That directory should not have been included in the release. It
is created as part of the build process and the contents are fetched
by Bower (similar to how Maven pulls in jars). Thanks for your
attention to detail. I will have a new set of release files
23 matches
Mail list logo
