This vote passes with 3 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes:
+1 Alan Gates (mentor)
+1 Ted Dunning (mentor)
+1 Justin Mclean
Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
I will make sure that the issue that Justin raised is fixed in the next release.
Julian
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Minor issue is that the RC was not placed in the correct place [1] Can this
be done with the next release candidate?
Yes, I will amend our release instructions to make sure that the RC is
placed in
+1 binding
Downloaded the artifacts and checked signatures and hashes. For the tar
file, I did the following:
- DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE seem correct.
- I ran rat via the verify goal. I believe that this will check all files
for licenses and check all licenses on dependencies
- inspected
Forwarding my +1 from dev@calcite:
+1. I checked the signatures, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files,
built the code and ran the tests, and checked to make sure there were no
jars or class files in the distribution.
Alan.
Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org
March 16, 2015 at 23:30
Hi
Hi all,
The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Calcite 1.1.0-incubating.
Proposal:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/calcite-dev/201503.mbox/%3ccamctmekcqb3bezn0q-1ug6tzxm1p6jzjvbun9jupsfnjc3r...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Vote result:
3 binding +1 votes
1
Hi,
+1 binding
- signatures and hashes correct
- artefact has incubating in it's name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- All source files have Apache header
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
- Tests pass
Minor issue is that the RC was not placed in the
