+1
On Apr 19, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> I'm not all to familiar with what the next steps should be.
>
> Update the status page, move the project on the projects index (probably
> retired is correct, rather than dormant) to reflect the change.
>
>> I assume the wsrp4j mailing l
On 04/20/2010 01:44 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the "standard" procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term "Retire" has better results. However as far
as i r
Ate Douma wrote:
>
> What exactly is the "standard" procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
> really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term "Retire" has better results. However as far
as i recall not much actual docs. Searching the m
> I'm not all to familiar with what the next steps should be.
Update the status page, move the project on the projects index (probably
retired is correct, rather than dormant) to reflect the change.
> I assume the wsrp4j mailing list (-dev and -user) should be closed
+1
> the svn project under
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community > itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate [WSRP4J]
And I further understand that the intent is to build a new codebase to
implement WSRP 2.0 within the Portals project.
+1
--- Noel
---
The vote for the termination of the WSRP4J podling passes with 9 binding +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
Tally of the binding +1 votes:
Ate Douma
Ralph Goers
Carsten Ziegler
Bertrand Delacretaz
ant elder
Davanum Srinivas
Martijn Dashorts
Niclas Hedhman
Luciano Resende
I'm not all to familiar wi
+1
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> > The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> > community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling
> due
> > to lack of inter
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
> to lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to rati
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
> to lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
> to lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:10 AM, ant elder wrote:
> +1
>
> ...ant
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
>> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
>> to lack of inte
+1
...ant
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
> to lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incuba
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> [X ] +1, terminate WSRP4J
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1, terminate WSRP4J
Carsten
Ate Douma wrote
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling
> due to lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to ratify
+1
Ralph
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due to
> lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incubator P
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the
podling due to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to ratify this decision. Please vote on
terminating the WSRP4J p
16 matches
Mail list logo
