On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> For what it's worth, on one dev list I'm on, pull requests make it to the
>> dev list, but commenting on a commit via the Github interface only triggers
>> a private notification --
Thanks Marvin for the pointers.
But my question is not so much whether we can accept pull requests or
handle GH issues. It is whether it is ok to be the *primary* workflow and
dev@ is an archive.
The podling is coming from a GitHub-only culture, and the core team in the
same company. S...
1.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
>...
> So, the questions I would ask are, are all those comments making it to the
> list? And are the podling participants showing through their actions that
> they understand inclusiveness, by ensuring that dev list readers are able
> to
>
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed
> it.
>
> So, then the question should have been;
>
> Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue
> tracker?
>
> Are we ok that discussions ha
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:29:54 +0100, "Raphael Bircher"
wrote:
> As long as all goes to the list, it's probably ok, but I would prefer ASF
> Tools over third party tools. Thy are under the Foundation control. Even
> GH is really strong at the moment, you don't know the future of the tools
> t
Hi Nicolas, *
Am .03.2017, 05:53 Uhr, schrieb Niclas Hedhman :
Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed
it.
So, then the question should have been;
Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue
tracker?
Are we ok that discussions happe
4:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Everyone,
I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache
projects.
In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those
captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I
suspect) in case Gi
On 06.03.2017 04:56, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Everyone,
I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache
projects.
In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those
captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I
s
easy about it, but does the Incubator as a whole have
an opinion/resolution on it?
Cheers
Niclas
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Everyone,
> > I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflo
On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Everyone,
> I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache
> projects.
>
> In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those
> captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is t
Everyone,
I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache
projects.
In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those
captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I
suspect) in case GitHub goes out of busines
11 matches
Mail list logo