: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache
Connectors Framework
It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the
other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd
Guys,
If I may: since we're discussing marks, why not post to trademarks@ and ask
Shane and crew to weigh in? Maybe you have already, but if so, I haven't seen
that discussion mentioned over here on gene...@incubator.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/30/10 10:03 AM, Grant Ignersoll
It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the
other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd.
Everything at Apache is in the vicinity of httpd.
I'd offer the following 'made-up'
Mmmm...some good ones there - I like manifold :)
On 8/30/10 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the
other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the
other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd.
ok, I fell off the main sequence.
On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, helium is the output product of a sun-like star, not the fuel. That
would be hydrogen.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems
On 8/27/2010 12:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
For me as a know-nothing outsider the suggestion of Content Connector
Framework pointed me a bit towards what it does.
+1 from the peanut gallery. :) I had the same thought - part of my (also
know-nothing outsider) knee-jerk issue with the ACF name is
On Aug 27, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 24, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:41 +1000, Gav... wrote:
I think the title of the name change is a little misleading.
We are not Replacing 'Lucene' with 'Apache' .
Apache is a given.
IOW -
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the
objections. That being said, I'm not all that clever at
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:41 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand
On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:09 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I
On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
assumptions about a name.
Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
Framework tells me it is either a generic connectors framework for
connecting
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Pid p...@pidster.com wrote:
On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
assumptions about a name.
Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
Framework tells me it
Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have
been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after waiting
several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption that no one
thought it was a problem.
At any rate, we'll go discuss.
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:49 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have
been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after
waiting several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption
that no
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the IPMC? I
rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the objections. That being
said, I'm not all that clever at naming, so...
On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:49 -0400, Grant
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote:
Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
Tomcat Connector?
Looks pretty distinct to me.
I agree, the risk that people confuse those two seems
As I attempted to politely make clear earlier I find this name extremely
confusing. Web connectors are just one subject area I assume this project
covers.
I think its generally a good idea if projects don't use their names to imply
they are the only apache implementation of a certain kind of
Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name.
--Glen
David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
As I attempted to politely make clear earlier I find this name extremely
confusing. Web connectors are just one subject area I assume this project
covers.
I think its generally
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Glen Daniels g...@thoughtcraft.com wrote:
Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name.
Something in the line of Apache Content Connectors Framework maybe?
Just my 0.02€
Regards
Paul
:33 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache
Connectors Framework
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Glen Daniels g...@thoughtcraft.com
wrote:
Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name.
Something
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
If the name is going to change (which sounds like a good idea) I'd
suggest going for something more abstract, to which you can give
meaning: Apache Connecto, or some such.
+1. -- justin
On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote:
Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
Tomcat Connector?
Looks pretty distinct to me.
p
On 18 Aug 2010, at 16:17, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or
Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
Tomcat Connector?
p
On 18 Aug 2010, at 16:17, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just do it?
Thankfully, I think most of our mailing lists, etc. are
Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just do it?
Thankfully, I think most of our mailing lists, etc. are already generic, so
we shouldn't really need to change much in terms of branding other than the
primary website.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Hi,
The Lucene Connectors Framework committers are voting to rename our project
from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework, and to
cease being a subproject of Lucene. What is the process for doing something
like this?
Karl
On Aug 16, 2010, at 9:59 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com karl.wri...@nokia.com
wrote:
Hi,
The Lucene Connectors Framework committers are voting to rename our project
from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework, and to
cease being a subproject of Lucene. What is the
The relevance of this name might seem clear to project members, but not to me.
From my background I would assume this is an implementation of the j2ca
connector framework at apache, kind of like (the active part of) codehaus
tranql. If I'd been working on tomcat or jetty recently I'd assume
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
The Lucene Connectors Framework committers are voting to rename our
project
from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework, and
to
cease being a subproject of Lucene. What is the process for doing
something
like this?
LCF is not a subproject of
30 matches
Mail list logo
