On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
As a long time member of the OpenOffice.org community, I would like to
offer
my thoughts on the Oracle/IBM proposal.
Thanks for the very well-written and well-reasoned post.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:22 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.org wrote on 06/02/2011 06:58:45 PM:
snip
Second, if Apache takes on OpenOffice, it will instantly become the
Apache
project with the largest number of end-users (if you include the number
of
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
As a long time member of the OpenOffice.org community, I would like to
offer
my thoughts on the Oracle/IBM proposal.
Thanks for the very well-written and well-reasoned post.
+1
--- Noel
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 20:22, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
...
The only concrete thing I've heard so far is the question of whether
subversion can handle the project.
I would be extremely surprised if Subversion could not handle it. I'd
like to know more about the problems that the OO.o devs
