Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> As an SVN committer, I can say that this is not something that is of
> concern to me (and I dare say I probably speak for all or at least
> most of the other committers when I say that).
Thanks for that reassurance...
> Finally, I will also add that we have had our SVN C
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> Sponsors
>> * Champion: Greg Stein
>
> Cool
>
>> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
>> Rall
>
> Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project leads').
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 07:06, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> Sponsors
>>> * Champion: Greg Stein
>>
>> Cool
>>
>>> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
>>> Rall
>>
>> Once ag
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:23, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>...
>> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
>> Rall
>
> Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project leads').
> It puts certain committers above others, an inequitable situation.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> Sponsors
>> * Champion: Greg Stein
>
> Cool
>
>> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
>> Rall
>
> Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project leads').
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Sponsors
> * Champion: Greg Stein
Cool
> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
> Rall
Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project leads').
It puts certain committers above others, an inequitable situation.
If the