ady existing vehicles
for
achieving the aims discussed in the Slider proposal.
Twill: handles all the AM logic for running new code packaged as a JAR
with
an executor method
Bigtop: stack testing
As a Bigtop committer, I disagree with this narrow interpretation of the
scope of the project, but this i
On 14 April 2014 04:43, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> I'd like to comment on what has been said about Twill.
>
> >> Twill: handles all the AM logic for running new code packaged as a JAR
> with
> >> an executor method
>
> The goal of Twill is much broader than to support writing new code. Its
> goal i
ng vehicles
> for
> >> > achieving the aims discussed in the Slider proposal.
> >>
> >>
> >> Twill: handles all the AM logic for running new code packaged as a JAR
> with
> >> an executor method
> >> Bigtop: stack testing
> >
>
> wrote:
> >> > The reason I ask is I'm wondering how Slider differentiates from
> projects
> >> > like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles
> for
> >> > achieving the aims discussed in the Slider proposal.
> >>
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>> > The reason I ask is I'm wondering how Slider differentiates from projects
>> > like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles for
>> > achieving the aims discussed in the Slider p
so assistance would be welcome.
>
>
> >
> > The reason I ask is I'm wondering how Slider differentiates from projects
> > like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles for
> > achieving the aims discussed in the Slider proposal.
>
>
>
ow well curator service
discovery works- so assistance would be welcome.
>
> The reason I ask is I'm wondering how Slider differentiates from projects
> like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles for
> achieving the aims discussed in the Slider proposal.
Twil
jects
like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles for
achieving the aims discussed in the Slider proposal. Tackling
cross-component resource management issues could certainly be that, but
only if core Hadoop services are also brought into the deployment and
management model,
Looks great, thanks for the update Steve.
Arun
> On Mar 31, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> For people wondering what's been happening with that Hoya proposal, I've
> got a successor proposal up for discussion.
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
Hi
For people wondering what's been happening with that Hoya proposal, I've
got a successor proposal up for discussion.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
This proposal -as well as having a different name- is a superset of the
original draft. It emphasises that making the tool us
10 matches
Mail list logo
