Ah, OK. Thanks for explaining.
On May 17, 2014 11:30 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Mohammad Noureldin
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >I agree with Henry. There is no need to go the board IMO, even if
> there
> > is no active mentor anymore I would suggest someone f
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Mohammad Noureldin
wrote:
> Hi
>
>I agree with Henry. There is no need to go the board IMO, even if there
> is no active mentor anymore I would suggest someone from the IPMC (maybe
> Romain) check this with the project's team and see how they want to
> progres
Hi
I agree with Henry. There is no need to go the board IMO, even if there
is no active mentor anymore I would suggest someone from the IPMC (maybe
Romain) check this with the project's team and see how they want to
progress with the project
On May 17, 2014 6:39 PM, "Henry Saputra" wrote:
>
I checked with one of the mentors and he claimed he has not been
mentoring the project for a while.
Seems like not much progress happening in the podling.
If any active mentors is still in this list I would propose checking
up with community if they still have energy or desire to continue.
- Hen
Hi!
after observing NPanday for quite a few month I am
now very concerned about the state of this podling.
It consistently misses reporting deadlines and even
when reports arrive they don't seem to be signed
off by a mentor. On top of that, the development
activity seems to be quite low.
I'm goin