On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad
- that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close
the vote after the standard 72 hours.
+1
I'm persuaded that the
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
...We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !..
+1 - as I said elsethread it's in theory Roman's job to start the
vote, as the Groovy
Hi guys,
we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to
start a vote ?
We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !
-
To
On 17/03/2015 15:34, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
...We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !..
+1 - as I said elsethread it's in
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Cédric Champeau
cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote:
...I wouldn't mind starting a vote early, given the time constraints that we
have :)...
Ok, I'll start the vote Wednesday morning CET unless we hear from
Roman until then.
-Bertrand
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to
start a vote ?
Sure. But at least a week for something like Groovy should be expected.
Besides, I still owe IPMC an answer about status
Hi!
having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week.
I am going to start a vote tomorrow once a full week of [DISCUSS]
elapses.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...I still owe IPMC an answer about status of the Groovy trademark.
I'm trying to research this on my end with Pivotal team...
Sure, it's good to find out but I don't think that's a blocker for
entering incubation.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week
I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after
10 matches
Mail list logo
