On Tuesday, March 31, 2015, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org
javascript:; wrote:
Not sure what are the licenses of the libs in question, so please refer
to
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html if in
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:55PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Not sure what are the licenses of the libs in question, so please refer to
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html if in doubt.
* zlib1 -- Zlib license
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Not sure what are the licenses of the libs in question, so please refer to
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html if in doubt.
* zlib1 -- Zlib license
* libxml2 -- MIT license
* GNU libiconv -- LGPL
* SDL --
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 01:10PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 22.03.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
Hi.
Sorry could not resist the subject line, but fact is I need a good advice.
I know our rulebook about including 3rd party libraries, but rules are open
to interpretation, and since I am involved in
On 22.03.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
Hi.
Sorry could not resist the subject line, but fact is I need a good advice.
I know our rulebook about including 3rd party libraries, but rules are open
to interpretation, and since I am involved in the development I consider my
opinion for biased.
In
What is the license of the 3rd party source code. I remember Apache
Ambari did the similar thing to bring Python code form Github repo.
- Henry
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:05 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
Sorry could not resist the subject line, but fact is I need a good advice.
I know
Hi.
Sorry could not resist the subject line, but fact is I need a good advice.
I know our rulebook about including 3rd party libraries, but rules are open
to interpretation, and since I am involved in the development I consider my
opinion for biased.
In Corinthia we depend on the following third
