Why not use J2EEUnit for serverside testing ?
It is built on top of JUnit.
It also is hosted SourceForge.
HttpUnit is only appropiate for client side testing.
The frameworks are geared for different audiences.
In this case J2EE would probably be more appropiate.
-Rob
I'll try again:
1. As someone said, "community is more important than code"
2. I think the real problem here is not "code sharing" - the fact that
people are reticent to reuse code developed in other projects is just an
effect
3. I think the real problem is that each project has it's own
* DataSource/Database Pool
+1
* XML Configuration
+1
* Message Resources / i18n
+1
* JNDI / Naming
* Testing Suites
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Clay Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
Check This!
DELETE THOSE TWO MESSAGES! THEY CONTAIN A VIRUS IN THE ATTACCHED VBS FILE.
Clay Atkins has been already unsubscribed from ALL mailing lists, and I'll
take care of mailbombing him privately later on today...
Pier
--
on 2/12/01 12:38 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
"Why didn't I start working with JUnit instead of creating our own testing
environment?"
No. My statement really is:
Why don't you look to see if you can work with the JUnit community to extend
JUnit to do
Just a uninformed lurker here...
There was a thread on the lack of a select statement in Java awhile
back. I was told by a more knowledgable colleague (and thus I might
have misunderstood him) that JSR 51 may address this problem...
I'll try again:
1. As someone said, "community is more important than code"
2. I think the real problem here is not "code sharing" - the fact that
people are reticent to reuse code developed in other projects
is just an
effect
3. I think the real problem is that each project has
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:42:38 -0800, Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2/12/01 12:38 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
"Why didn't I start working with JUnit instead of creating our own testing
environment?"
No. My statement really is:
Why
* Ovidiu Predescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
I believe we should look at the merits of his framework before
discussing how or whether it can or should be integrated with JUnit.
Your approach of one size fits all doesn't always work.
I totally agree, and as the original 'cause' of this
Sam Ruby wrote:
It looks like Avalon has been steadily deprecating interfaces that James
has been depending on. Now James is broken.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-02-11/james.html
Who wants to volunteer to look into it?
Standard reason: if one wants to deploy a
Hi Erich, Kent.
There is a discussion going on in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
that I would like to invite you two to participate in.
I am copying a large number of mailing lists as the original e-mail
forwarded below has triggered a lot of separate discussions, but I would
like to ask
FYI, I just got this message that indicates that the virus we just
received uses mail client address books to propagate itself.
Willie
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:46:11 -0500
From: Jean Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anna
Willie Wheeler wrote:
FYI, I just got this message that indicates that the virus we just
received uses mail client address books to propagate itself.
*Microsoft* mail client address books. That's the critical piece...
geir
Willie
-- Forwarded message --
Ted Husted wrote:
On 2/9/2001 at 8:12 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
I would suggest that you start with a proposed code base.
Going back over the posts, there seem to be at least five clear areas of
overlap:
* DataSource/Database Pool
+1
* XML Configuration
+1
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr.
A good java poll/select discussion can be found at:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4066781.html
- Pat
- Original Message -
From: "e_teer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: Java select statement
Just
15 matches
Mail list logo
