Did you consider that we were out of functional email reach?
+1 from me - I haven't used it, but it comes highly recommended from a
source I trust (besides you...)
geir
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted
+1 (back at home recovering from J1).
Craig
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote:
Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
+1
I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting
Does Jakarta has anything close to an embedded pure Java
relational data base ?
If not, a project like that will be a great
addition to the Jakarta family.
Tal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Why not. A relational/ohject database. One that may be queried with
standard SQL and OQL. It should probably work with the up and coming Sun
Microsystems JDO spec.
-Original Message-
From: Tal Dayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 5:11 PM
To: [EMAIL
Cory L Hubert wrote:
Why not. A relational/ohject database. One that may be queried with
standard SQL and OQL. It should probably work with the up and coming Sun
Microsystems JDO spec.
-Original Message-
From: Tal Dayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June
