Noel,
But I don't think that we need a separate TLP for it. I would leave
the project in the community that last hosted the now dormant project.
Good point, perhaps we just need to organise ourselves.
d.
***
The
Geir wrote:
Well, I'm a little leery about sending watchdog traffic (even if none)
to general@ - all it takes is one guy getting interested :)
(My silence was due to temporary no-email-at-home, not indifference!)
I'd prefer to propose the following:
1/ that a PMC vote is taken *HERE* to
Noel wrote:
We leave the resources in place, with a notice that the project is
dormant. If it is revitalized, great. If not, what harm is there?
To me it seems like an opportunity for part of jakarta to fall out of PMC
oversight.
I'm not suggesting that there is any legal controversy
I don't think that working, used-by-users code is 'dead'. There may
not be an active community of developers, but if the code is done, it's
done.
I agree. I think we should consider it as the caretakeing of the user
community of a stable product, and if it ever arises, the sponsors of a
On Jun 7, 2004, at 5:05 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
Geir wrote:
Well, I'm a little leery about sending watchdog traffic (even if none)
to general@ - all it takes is one guy getting interested :)
(My silence was due to temporary no-email-at-home, not indifference!)
I'd prefer to propose the following:
