Hi Jakarta Board-
A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta
smoke and flames threads.
I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC
quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer approval,
etc.
Maybe it already exists?
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
If poi committers agree with this proposal, I like to hear them :)
We had a discussion on something like this on the poi-dev list back in the
summer. To save everyone having to trawl back, here's basically what I had
to say.
I it is felt that POI
On 12/20/06, David Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jakarta Board-
A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta
smoke and flames threads.
I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC
quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer
I don't know... a secure webapp for votes seems overkill for most situations.
I like the informal nature of the voting on the lists. It encourages
participation. People can vote with non-binding votes, which is a
good thing, I think -- they get to express their opinion and influence
the
Hi Henri,
[...] I was mostly thinking
about it because I felt like writing something new rather than
maintaining code):
That's the best reason of all :-)
* Simplifies calling a vote.
* Adds a better audit trail.
* Can know about the binding votes and it can decide whether a vote is
