Jon Stevens wrote:
on 2/15/01 2:19 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Turbine's pool (still) does not do
this -- and that makes perfect sense, because it existed before the DataSource
API was standardized. Changing Turbine's pool to conform to this w
Sam Ruby wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I just don't want to work with you (and the attitudes you carry)
on Turbine.
Hmmm.
As release manager of Tomcat 4.0, you appear quite willing to ship code
that he (and the attitudes that he carries) has committed to that cvs tree.
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about starting the "reuse" quest by reusing the jakarta-tools
repository ?
Wouldn't that break the "old" version of Watchdog ("jakarta-watchdog") that still
has dependencies here?
At any rate, the process questions need to be settled now (before any of us get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone can ( and should ) vote on those issues, but only jakarta-tools
commiter votes will be counted ( for the first one). If the first vote is
positive, all commter votes will be counted for the second :-)
OK, since you put it formally, I will as well: -1
For
Several times, on several developer lists here within the Jakarta
community and elsewhere, the question comes up -- "why aren't we sharing
more code between projects and subprojects"? Lots of us have opinions
and experiences about where this has worked (and not worked) for them in
the past. The
Ceki Glc wrote:
Hello,
Daniel Savarese suggested that e-mail addresses on the "Who we are" page should not
be listed directly as a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a but as "foo at
bar.com".
This is will make it harder for spam robots to collect our e-mail addresses. For
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
