On 15.10.09 00:49, Henri Yandell wrote:
Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO,
Regexp and ECS over to Commons.
I thought, Attic was the correct place, at least for ECS?
Bye, Thomas.
-
To
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In my opinion, JMeter should really go top-level, but the community
has not yet (and may never) come to that conclusion.
JMeter used to be just at the brink of being viable as
a TLP. Mailing list traffic is stable and high, but the
number of active developers was
Quick recap so far is that there have been a variety of views
expressed on the topic of one dev@ (and commits@/notifications@), and
it seems there is some positive interest in moving ahead. Therefore,
as noted towards the end of the email below, I'll be moving to the
next step of calling a vote on
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org
wrote:
Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org wrote:
Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
discussion after resolving his more narrowly scoped dev@/commits@
proposal. The
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org
wrote:
Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote:
Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO,
Regexp and ECS over to Commons.
I'm happy to help out with the move if desired. If active projects
then moving to a new site style and JIRA would come up,
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
general@ as user@ to contain user traffic for all Jakarta projects,
retiring all the -user lists in the process. People can specify the
specific project referred to in the subject a la Commons
That may work for Commons, because it is the established
procedure there.
In message 4ad4c6e2.2090...@dubioso.net, Roland Weber writes:
Have you noticed how much traffic there is on jmeter-user?
It will easily drown all other communication on a combined
user list. Subscribers to any other Jakarta user list will
*not* be amused about getting all that into their inboxes.
A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to
shut down the slide user and dev lists, but that slipped off the
radar. Is that desired now?
On 10/10/2009, at 8:43 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to shut
down the slide user and dev lists, but that slipped off the radar. Is that
desired now?
snip/
ISTR some discussion but its been a while. Before I go
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/attic-general/200902.mbox/%3ca3af8739-d168-44b6-8544-201f8d5b5...@dslextreme.com%3e
On 13/10/2009, at 6:18 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org
wrote:
A related side note - some time back I think there
Care to elaborate a bit?
I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out once
consolidated indeed is. It's an all-or-nothing. How is oversight
better when everyone (or at least all PMC members) are subscribed to
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Care to elaborate a bit?
I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out once
consolidated indeed is. It's an all-or-nothing. How is
On 11/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Care to elaborate a bit?
I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time
to consolidate them into a single development list at Jakarta.
...
...@jakarta.apache.org; jmeter-...@jakarta.apache.org; oro-
d...@jakarta.apache.org; regexp-...@jakarta.apache.org; slide-
d...@jakarta.apache.org; Jakarta Project Management Committee List
Subject: [PROPOSAL] One development list
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any replies
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any replies to the gene...@jakarta list only to keep any discussion in
one place.]
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
my
In message ce1f2ea80910091443t5cad1db0na0663c416cb83...@mail.gmail.com, Rahul
Akolkar writes:
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org wrote:
In message ce1f2ea80910091443t5cad1db0na0663c416cb83...@mail.gmail.com,
Rahul
Akolkar writes:
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a
On 10/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org wrote:
In message ce1f2ea80910091443t5cad1db0na0663c416cb83...@mail.gmail.com,
Rahul
Akolkar writes:
We currently have 8 active development lists at
21 matches
Mail list logo
