Let's get this vote over with, TLP resolution (if such is the consensus)
etc, then we can vote latka and commons-test in its direction.
commons-test needs a release as Apache Discovery have releases that are
dependent on its snapshot version.
Hen
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, [iso-8859-1] Jörg Scha
+1 (non-binding)
What about the domrant commons-test? I already tried to reactivate the project,
but due to a current lack of time I stopped this for now. Nevertheless I have a
proposal in my outbox for an official attempt to reactivate it.
- Jörg
Felipe Leme wrote on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6
+1.
It could also be a home to latka, which is out of place here in
jakarta-commons.
On 4/21/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The options are:
> >
> > [X] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the
> new TLP
> > [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but
The options are:
[X] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP
[ ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
Same motivation as Yoav and Rahul..
Mvgr,
Marti
Felipe Leme schrieb:
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[ X] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP
[ ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
Best regards
Henn
On 4/18/06, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ X ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new
> TLP
> [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new
> TLP
> [ ] +0 it does not matter to me
> [ ] -1 I am against it because
Here's my +1 and I would be glad to contribute to the new TLP.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Felipe Leme
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:03 PM
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Move Ja
Felipe Leme wrote:
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[ X ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new
TLP
[ ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
-
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[X] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP
[ ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
Stephen
-
[X ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP
[ ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
---
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP
[ X ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
I support the move, a
On 18/04/06, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the last months, there have been some discussions internally (at
> Jakarta PMC, Cactus and JMeter lists) about creating a new Testing TLP
> (Apache Top Level Project) and moving Cactus and JMeter out of Jakarta
> to this new proje
Hola,
> [ X ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new
> TLP
> [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new
> TLP
> [ ] +0 it does not matter to me
> [ ] -1 I am against it because
I support the new TLP and would like to contr
Hi all,
In the last months, there have been some discussions internally (at
Jakarta PMC, Cactus and JMeter lists) about creating a new Testing TLP
(Apache Top Level Project) and moving Cactus and JMeter out of Jakarta
to this new project (which eventually could grow and 'acquire' more
projects, li
14 matches
Mail list logo
