Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect

2004-01-28 Thread dion
If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] for all our existing code? Will someone need to look up the original author and all updaters in CVS? -- dIon Gillard,

Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect

2004-01-28 Thread Henri Yandell
So far I've just heard that all new releases must be using the new licence post March 1st 2004. Though doesn't hurt to sweep through CVS updating as time allows. Hen On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some

Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect

2004-01-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 28, 2004, at 9:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] for all our existing code? Will someone need to look up the original

Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect

2004-01-28 Thread Martin van den Bemt
The ASF is the copyright holder.. Btw just moved a codehaus project to use v 2.0 :) Mvgr, Martin On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in

Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect

2004-01-28 Thread dion
Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/01/2004 02:02:05 AM: The ASF is the copyright holder.. Not exclusively. The original author also retains copyright to any works as well, AFAIK. Btw just moved a codehaus project to use v 2.0 :) Mvgr, Martin -- dIon Gillard, Multitask