Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread costinm
That leaves me perplexed for several reasons... First, it's the first time I see a commiter rejected - without any reference to the quality and importance of his contribution, but some new member's standard we don't know about. Dan put the SSI system in a decent shape, that's similar with the

Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That leaves me perplexed for several reasons... First, it's the first time I see a commiter rejected - without any reference to the quality and importance of his contribution, but some new member's standard we don't know about. Dan put the SSI

Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Personally, I feel this discussion belongs solely on the tomcat list and is up to the committers of Tomcat to resolve. If the Tomcat community feels the bar should be raised, let them raise it. If

Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Michael A. Smith
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: It is of general interest (IMO) because becoming a committer entitles you not only to a little peaceful heaven in your own little project, but entitles you (and, frankly, obliges you) to be a part of the Jakarta Community at large. You will be given

Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe we deserve some explanation from the 'members', I'm quite unhappy about this whole issue. If there are some new quantitative standards for becoming a commiter ( or a member ) we should know about. The ASF members didn't impose any standard.

Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
What I said was but I believe that this group (as noted on the members meeting this Tuesday) is giving away committer privileges a little bit too easily... I don't think that sound like this is a resolution passed by members or this is a guideline given at that meeting... To me it sounds like

RE: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Danny Angus
I'm sorry, but I believe that any time a new committer is made, we _need_ to put some thought in what we're giving away, we're not just letting a guy commit to our CVS server... +1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] New Committer Dan Sandberg

2002-05-24 Thread Kurt Schrader
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: And at large, it entitles you to have an @apache.org email address, to have access to our live servers, entitles you to be a part of the whole Apache family... you're point being? I think that the point is that when you gain an @apache.org