On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
If poi committers agree with this proposal, I like to hear them :)
We had a discussion on something like this on the poi-dev list back in the
summer. To save everyone having to trawl back, here's basically what I had
to say.
I it is felt that POI
+1 to this thread (the Jakarta parts - not the let's all talk about
our kids, but if anyone wants to I'm as talkative as any other father
:) ).
+1 to making progress -1 to re-running the old bile.
My kids both got hamsters yesterday (early for christmas), boy was that
ever exciting! :-)
d.
Andy-- good thoughts. A very pragmatic look at the situation.
Defuses the debate and provides practical suggestions for moving
forward.
By the way, as a POI user, I wouldn't worry too much about POI being
doomed due to Microsoft's switch in formats. It's going to take years
for developers to
Thank you Andy for the detailed and constructive response. I didn't and
won't participate in the previous thread because there were too many
negatives there.
I like the proposals below, so long as the X months is not too large. I
believe a 3-4 months target is appropriate for a POI TLP.
Sounds good to me - thanks for this.
Niall
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really liked hearing Avik speak up because he's been hurting for
awhile and not spoken up. It was Nick's first release, cut him some
slack. POI has been around since 2001, in Apache since
Nice, agreed.
-Rahul
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really liked hearing Avik speak up because he's been hurting for
snip/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
+1. take a break :)
-- dims
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really liked hearing Avik speak up because he's been hurting for
awhile and not spoken up. It was Nick's first release, cut him some
slack. POI has been around since 2001, in Apache since 2002. It is
nearly
Hi Andrew,
thanks a lot for that mail.
It is
fair to criticize our build...it is pretty rusty and yucky. I do
however thing focusing too much on it is a bit well...mean.
See my reply to Avik's mail. I didn't mean to focus.
(That pun was unintentional, but I'll leave it in.)
I really don't
See inline.
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
It is fair to say that not many POI people participate in Jakarta.
However, to add perspective we never joined the Jakarta as it is -- we
joined Jakarta as it was...and one day this formed around us. It is
fair to criticize our build...it is pretty
Is this just your proposal or do other POI committers back this up ? (probably
in the text, but not
as clear as I like it to be).
If poi committers agree with this proposal, I like to hear them :)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To
Need to add here that for the TLP Proposal you also need a vote from Jakarta..
I'll try to shut up now :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
See inline.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Sleep Martinsleep. All will be answered, resolved...but not today.
Right now I'm going to help my 2 year old draw dinosaurs with his
Hanukkah present (he is obsessed with dinosaurs).
-andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sleep Martinsleep. All will be answered, resolved...but not today.
Right now I'm going to help my 2 year old draw dinosaurs with his
Hanukkah present (he is obsessed with dinosaurs).
My 2 year old is obsessed with trains. We let the
13 matches
Mail list logo
