Cool! I'm impressed! I'll have to check that out.
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 20:12, Daniel Rall wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even if it ties me to an Apache-proprietary template language, trading
that for something less disgusting than JSP seems preferable.
Note that
I believe they also tried to make a JSR out of it, but got shot down
somewhere in the middle... :-(
Pier
On 9/10/02 13:38, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool! I'm impressed! I'll have to check that out.
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 20:12, Daniel Rall wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver
What do you expect from idiots who think naming api's JAX[letter] is a
good idea? (JAXM/JAXP/JAXB/JAXC/etc... I'm sorry but that is just
really really stupid sick and befuddled! BAD BAD BADAnd this is
coming from me! The sick abbreviation kingpin himself!)
-Andy
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at
on 2002/10/9 4:20 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe they also tried to make a JSR out of it, but got shot down
somewhere in the middle... :-(
Pier
Geir and I approached the JCP about creating a JSR for a Java Template
Language (see enclosed) and even had a number
Hello ,
we have developed a web site in which we have implemented struts for
designing the page , this works fine on Apache and jsp engine from
oracle (9ias)
but we now have to move the web site to apache and tomcat environment.
the jsp pages are compiling fine on this env. but only the
on 2002/10/8 9:39 AM, amar bhatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello ,
we have developed a web site in which we have implemented struts for
designing the page , this works fine on Apache and jsp engine from
oracle (9ias)
but we now have to move the web site to apache and tomcat environment.
I think my next hack'd app will be in Velocity rather than JSP. As I
learn more about it I think I find it less disgusting than JSP.
(Although I still don't like it for the previously mentioned reasons)
Even if it ties me to an Apache-proprietary template language, trading
that for something
