Re: Needing Help for running tomcat after build...
Tamer Higazi wrote: Hallo, I have downloaded ANT, Apache Tomcat. How do I start the tomcat apache server? Those type of questions should be asked on the 'Tomcat User List'. See: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Tomcat How to subscribe. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Needing Help for running tomcat after build...
Hallo, I have downloaded ANT, Apache Tomcat. I installed ANT with all dependencies on my server (with all variables under the linux shell to set) and build the Tomcat Server by running "ant" in the source root directory (where also the build.xml file is located). After the installation script downloaded from the net several packages I don't know how to go on from this point. How do I start the tomcat apache server? For any Help Thank you Tamer Higazi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
locale issue in Wiki FrontPage
Hi, I've noticed that the Wiki page is under construction. New version of MoinMoin, maybe? :) Anyways, currently there's a locale problem. I use my PC mainly with the Japanese locale, causing every FrontPage without specifying the wiki name to display the default MoinMoin FrontPage in Japanese. eg. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/ I'd like to see the contents of http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/FrontPage when I do this. (I do if I change my PC's locale to US.) Best regards, -- Shinobu -- Shinobu Kawai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [site] build.xml includes force=true
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, sebb wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:06:33 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, meant to replyt on this stuff last night but it turned into a mildly late one at work, followed by the usual household chores. No problem. I think the problem was that it was not noticing when the navigation was being changed, so somebody added a force. OK, I see. Although it causes it to build everything, SVN's seems to handle it and notices the 1 or 2 files that have actually changed. Under 1.5 it builds so quickly (10-ish seconds on my P3 1Ghz) that it's not seemed a big deal. Yes, it builds quickly enough. I must admit I did not dare try committing all the files to SVN, as I did not want to generate huge diff listings... Do an svn status. I think you'll find you've changed a lot less files (from SVN's point of view) than you think, unless you're using JDK 1.4 (where it's a lot slower) or we're getting an odd linux vs mac vs windows encoding issue. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [site] build.xml includes force=true
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:19:49 +, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:06:33 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, meant to replyt on this stuff last night but it turned into a > > mildly late one at work, followed by the usual household chores. > > No problem. > > > I think the problem was that it was not noticing when the navigation was > > being changed, so somebody added a force. > > OK, I see. > > > Although it causes it to build everything, SVN's seems to handle it and > > notices the 1 or 2 files that have actually changed. Under 1.5 it builds > > so quickly (10-ish seconds on my P3 1Ghz) that it's not seemed a big deal. > > Yes, it builds quickly enough. > > I must admit I did not dare try committing all the files to SVN, as I > did not want to generate huge diff listings... > > Ideally the files would not be recreated, as there must be quite a bit > of overhead in sending the files back to SVN for it to ignore them, > but unless the overlooked dependency can be fixed, I guess it all > needs to be rebuilt. Actually, I would not expect those files to be sent to the SVN server at all, since diff is a local operation. (One of the big advantages of SVN. ;) -- Martin Cooper > > Hen > > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, sebb wrote: > > > > > build.xml was updated in r128387 to add force=true to all the > > > transformations. > > > > > > Is this needed? > > > [The log does not say why it was added]. > > > > > > It causes files to be always out of date with respect to the SVN copies. > > > > > > Seems to me it should either be removed - or at least be made a property? > > > > > > S. > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [site] build.xml includes force=true
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:06:33 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, meant to replyt on this stuff last night but it turned into a > mildly late one at work, followed by the usual household chores. No problem. > I think the problem was that it was not noticing when the navigation was > being changed, so somebody added a force. OK, I see. > Although it causes it to build everything, SVN's seems to handle it and > notices the 1 or 2 files that have actually changed. Under 1.5 it builds > so quickly (10-ish seconds on my P3 1Ghz) that it's not seemed a big deal. Yes, it builds quickly enough. I must admit I did not dare try committing all the files to SVN, as I did not want to generate huge diff listings... Ideally the files would not be recreated, as there must be quite a bit of overhead in sending the files back to SVN for it to ignore them, but unless the overlooked dependency can be fixed, I guess it all needs to be rebuilt. > Hen > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, sebb wrote: > > > build.xml was updated in r128387 to add force=true to all the > > transformations. > > > > Is this needed? > > [The log does not say why it was added]. > > > > It causes files to be always out of date with respect to the SVN copies. > > > > Seems to me it should either be removed - or at least be made a property? > > > > S. > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [site] build.xml includes force=true
Sorry, meant to replyt on this stuff last night but it turned into a mildly late one at work, followed by the usual household chores. I think the problem was that it was not noticing when the navigation was being changed, so somebody added a force. Although it causes it to build everything, SVN's seems to handle it and notices the 1 or 2 files that have actually changed. Under 1.5 it builds so quickly (10-ish seconds on my P3 1Ghz) that it's not seemed a big deal. Hen On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, sebb wrote: build.xml was updated in r128387 to add force=true to all the transformations. Is this needed? [The log does not say why it was added]. It causes files to be always out of date with respect to the SVN copies. Seems to me it should either be removed - or at least be made a property? S. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[site] build.xml includes force=true
build.xml was updated in r128387 to add force=true to all the transformations. Is this needed? [The log does not say why it was added]. It causes files to be always out of date with respect to the SVN copies. Seems to me it should either be removed - or at least be made a property? S. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
