Re:

2001-02-21 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I assume that was something in japanese which very few people can read. Please post ascii based emails and we may be able to understand whatever it was you were saying :) It was spam, I checked it out... I got 5/6 copies of the message for the different

Re: Is open source unamerican...

2001-02-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Pier, I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says: Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ... I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business. It takes a huge amount of effort to build

[PROPOSAL] Site update for RPMs

2001-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
This is an expurged message from one sent to tomcat-dev list Could we change reference to projects in http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html. Some points to xxx/bin : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-ant/release/v1.2/bin/

Re: Is open source unamerican...

2001-02-21 Thread Alex Fernández
Hi Ceki! Long mail follows. Ceki Glc wrote: Pier, I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says: Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ... I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property

socket write error

2001-02-21 Thread Bruno Crapart
I work with Tomcat 3.2 and Apache last stable version Can somebody help me to fix the problem below, it appears in Tomcat Window only with image files. 2001-02-21 02:41:06 - Ctx( /robinson ): IOException in: R( /robinson + /carrier ite/anglais/haut.htm + null) Connection aborted by peer: socket

Re: Is open source unamerican...

2001-02-21 Thread Adam Haberlach
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 08:35:43AM +1100, Green, Alan wrote: Ceki Glc wrote: I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says: Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ... I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the

RE: Is open source unamerican...

2001-02-21 Thread Green, Alan
Ceki Glc wrote: I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says: Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ... I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business. Shouldn't this be attributed to

RE: socket write error

2001-02-21 Thread Randy Layman
Its not a problem. Its your web browser realizing that it already has an update copy of the resource (image, CSS, html, etc) and deciding to save some network bandwidth and close the socket. To not see this message any more you need to move your logging one level up from the

Re: [POLL] Re: Code Sharing Concepts

2001-02-21 Thread James Duncan Davidson
on 2/15/01 11:56 AM, Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't have any time to waste on anarchy-based shared code repositories. I have lots of time to spend, and useful code to contribute, to a shared repository that I know I can confidently use in my projects, based on

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

2001-02-21 Thread Kevin A. Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: on 2/11/01 1:15 PM, "Doug Davis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The point being that: It doesn't matter that JUnit doesn't do what you want. The fact of the matter is that instead of creating yet another

Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal

2001-02-21 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/21/01 10:05 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goals are to move it back under Apache as long as we can keep the dual LGPL/APL License. Kevin Sorry. That won't happen (as far as I know). The ASF board would never go for it. -jon -- If you come from a Perl or PHP