On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi Jon,
I am referring to otherwise honest people who choose to contribute
their enhancements back to the project. They create new classes but in
the process remove the names of previous authors. They do this in
good-faith as otherwise they would
There is many reference in IBM manuals and online doc
with 'Powered by Apache'.
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/
For ref about Tomcat under AS/400 go there are search for Tomcat
http://www.ignite400.org/cgi-dta/dtwforum.d2w/search
-
Henri Gomez
I almost forgot. A corollary of the 10+ lines authorship rule is that if you
copy-and-paste over ten lines of code then you should grant the author of the 10+
lines authorship status on your code that imports the 10+ lines.
If the copy-and-pasted code has a different license/copyright then
I am starting a new open source project and would like to use the apache
licence for two reasons: the ability to use the code in commercial projects
and in the hope that one day it may get accepted as a Jakarta project. I
have a couple of questions as to how to apply the licence:
Does the full
Jasper Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am starting a new open source project and would like to use the apache
licence for two reasons: the ability to use the code in commercial projects
and in the hope that one day it may get accepted as a Jakarta project. I
have a couple of questions as
on 6/8/01 6:52 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jasper Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am starting a new open source project and would like to use the apache
licence for two reasons: the ability to use the code in commercial projects
and in the hope that one day it may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pete wrote:
I am not sure this is true - at least in the US and Australian law.
This was told me by a lawyer over here:
In Scotland, the authors of open source and public domain software
could be
liable where there is no printed licence
Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
+1
I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
voted (shame on you). Can I please get the
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/8/01 6:52 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jasper Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am starting a new open source project and would like to use the apache
licence for two reasons: the ability to use the code in commercial
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The other being a potential
regression in reflection/security found in Scarab. I say potential
regression as I don't know yet if it is a security hole that has been
closed, a tightening up of checks that prior JDKs were lax on,
Sean Legassick wrote:
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The other being a potential
regression in reflection/security found in Scarab. I say potential
regression as I don't know yet if it is a security hole that has been
closed, a tightening up of checks that prior JDKs were lax on, or a bug.
on 6/8/01 10:56 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're on the licensing list, and know better than me, but I remember
committing something with headers like
/***
* (C) , The Apache Software
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/8/01 10:56 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're on the licensing list, and know better than me, but I remember
committing something with headers like
/***
*
At 01:24 08.06.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I think this is really a significant question. How significant a patch
does it take for someone to legitimately be considered an additional
author of a particular source file? Attribution in a CVS commit should
always be there -- but is
Since jdk 1.4 uses jdbc3, of course jdbc drivers will now not compile.
The bug is in the Sun documentation saying that 1.4 is compatible with
1.3.
Sam Ruby wrote:
Edwin Goei wrote:
Oops, I sent a reply before reading this email. I'd encourage you to
file bugs on the other components
15 matches
Mail list logo
