| I note for the record, however, that I received two copies of this email,
| which means that Joe must have hit Group Reply, so that means that *even
| with* Reply-to munging on, the principle of minimal bandwidth is violated :-)
Not that I think it matters _that_ much, but I seriously like
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
| on 7/11/01 11:12 AM, Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| I note for the record, however, that I received two copies of this email,
| which means that Joe must have hit Group Reply, so that means that *even
| with* Reply-to munging on, the
Yesterday, it took 14.5 hours to do cvs updates across the various
projects, and that is with 13 cvs updates cancelled due to timeout. Today
looks worse, so I've cancelled it after 13.5 hours and 15 timeouts. Had I
not cancelled it, it is clear that several projects would be seeing some of
the
on 7/13/01 1:42 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday, it took 14.5 hours to do cvs updates across the various
projects, and that is with 13 cvs updates cancelled due to timeout. Today
looks worse, so I've cancelled it after 13.5 hours and 15 timeouts. Had I
not cancelled it, it
