Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

I've had a look at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html ... Here are the strange things I found : * Alexandria : no user list (Pier I thought you said ALL projects had both lists ;-) ) * Avalon : no user list and a strange cvs list (I thought all CVS messages went to the devlist ?) *

Re: Standardizing build.xml files

Ainsi parlait Berin Loritsch : [..]  I propose we borrow a number of conventions from the GNU  make utility manual  (http://www.gnu.org/manual/make-3.79.1/html_chapter/make_14.html). Some other GNU conventions (not specilay related to make) that would be very useful concerns naming. It makes

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding cactus : I think we should leave a few more days for other committer to vote. I don't know what the standard number of days to leave. Why don't we say until monday 12:00 PM GMT. Then we submit the proposition to the PMC for their blessing.

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

Hey, don't take me wrong here :-) I just jumped in because I saw some post on this newsgroup saying that you wanted to homogeneise mailing lists ... I probably misunderstood the intent which was maybe only to standardise on the mailing-list names (or rather to align with the existing

Re: what is org.apache.log package ?

Hi. See http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/logkit/index.html - Original Message - From: Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 11:22 PM Subject: what is org.apache.log package ? I already asked this on velocity dev

Re: what is org.apache.log package ?

Ainsi parlait Eung-ju Park : Hi. See http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/logkit/index.html Thanks ! -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok for doing the website but I would have preferred someone who has already done it and has everything set up on his machine (I don't and will have to learn the mechanism before so it'll take a some time). To summarise, there are 2

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

- Original Message - From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok for doing the website

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

- Original Message - From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok for doing the website

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, don't take me wrong here :-) I don't :) :) :) I just jumped in because I saw some post on this newsgroup saying that you wanted to homogeneise mailing lists ... I probably misunderstood the intent which was maybe only to standardise on the