Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-06 Thread Santiago Gala
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 11:24, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2/4/02 1:58 PM, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snip) They dropped the ball for java on the desktop: sun management decided that it will never happen: there will be no Java

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-06 Thread Peter Donald
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:41, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: *if* there was an open, semi-stable platform then I am sure a fair chunk of people would flock to it - especially if it is under a nice license like MIT that both the BSD and GPL people seem to like. BUT THERE WON'T BE! you

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-06 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
snip/ Become a strategist. There will always a need for people telling people what they should do next. At least for people that does not read these lists. ;) Where do I sign? :-) I'm always happy telling people what they should do next ;-). -Andy -- www.superlinksoftware.com

Re: need help!!!

2002-02-06 Thread Ted Husted
The best place to post a question like this is the Struts USER list. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html ¶ª ¶ª wrote: hello! I am a java developer,and I used Struts for serval days..but i found something wrong whit struts. For a chinese,I use gb2312 code ..and i write the

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

2002-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600 From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED], Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: General Jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PMC

Re: Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

2002-02-06 Thread acoliver
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:29:39 -0800 Micael Padraig Og mac Grene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote. McClanahan ROCKS! +1 At 12:32 PM 2/6/02 -0500, you wrote: Craig McClanahan wrote: At Apache, I got involved in the Apache JServ project before there was a Jakarta (along with other long timers like

Re: Are 3 votes necessary for the PMC nomination? [was: Re: To jvoteor not to jvote]

2002-02-06 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: So, what was the answer to the question below? If we really do need two +1s for a nomination, then I have some campaigning to do! (Unless someone else wants to go ahead and +1 me, if only to shut me up. ;) At this point the rules posted for

Re: PMC Nomination - Ted Husted

2002-02-06 Thread Ted Husted
Assuming there is a sufficient number of willing candidates to fill the seven slots, I would respectfully decline my nomination, so as to ensure someone else the chance to serve. It's been my experience that the best way to build community is to not only participate yourself, but also to give

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

2002-02-06 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36 PM Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even if

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

2002-02-06 Thread Peter Donald
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:49, Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36 PM Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache After some