Re: Naming issues

Aaron Bannert wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:05:36PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: The reality is that this *will* create tensions and flamewars. Like we're seeing on reorg@. Then you've seen nothing yet ;-) Wait, you think that's normal? Unfortunately it's way too common :-( I

Re: Naming issues

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:05:36PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>The reality is that this *will* create tensions and flamewars. > > > >Like we're seeing on reorg@. > > Then you've seen nothing yet ;-) Wait, you think that's normal? -aaron -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Naming issues

> > Therefor I still think Jakarta Commons should fix their naming scheme. > > But that will have to be brought up there, not here. > > It's completely impractical, and will hurt Jakarta immensely. > > Oh, well, now that I think of it, this is only for projects that have > already been released.

Re: Naming issues

Sander Striker wrote: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:nicolaken@;apache.org] Sent: 21 October 2002 10:54 [...] I agree that what you say is the most sensible and correct way... The reality is that this *will* create tensions and flamewars. Like we're seeing on reorg@. Then you've seen

Re: Naming issues

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>Therefor I still think Jakarta Commons should fix their naming scheme. > >>>But that will have to be brought up there, not here. > >> > >>It's completely impractical, and will hurt Jakarta immensely. > >> > >>Oh, we

Re: Naming issues

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Therefor I still think Jakarta Commons should fix their naming scheme. But that will have to be brought up there, not here. It's completely impractical, and will hurt Jakarta immensely. Oh, well, now that I think of it, this is only for projects that have already been

OT: Presentation layer

One day W3.org will release xforms tag to replace the forms tag. Here me now, listen to me later. Here is a plug in for IE: http://www.FormsPlayer.com With great links. Exciting. Also http://jxforms.cybernd.at/ is also ok. .V -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Naming issues

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Why not just decide to move the Jakarta Commons projects to Commons and > > the Sandbox ones to Incubator? > > > > This is not a proposal for a diktat, but a *suggestion* for Jakarta > > Commons pro

Re: Newsletter

The consensus (mainly private mails) seems to be to stick to the monthly scheme and accept September as a blip. So business as usual - I'll call for contributions covering Sep + Oct sometime next week and post drafts from the 4th. Cheers, Rob - Original Message - From: "Brian Ewins" <

Re: Naming issues

Henri Yandell wrote: On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Therefor I still think Jakarta Commons should fix their naming scheme. But that will have to be brought up there, not here. It's completely impractical, and will hurt Jakarta immensely. Oh, well

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins Jakarta

V. Cekvenich wrote: Struts 1.1 has something called tiles that are can be used for re-use, and at run time a tile can be bound to different beans, and more advanced capabilities. http://www.lifl.fr/~dumoulin/tiles/doc/tutorialBody.html and an advanced PDF (in doco of basicPortal which uses tile

Re: Naming issues

Michael A. Smith wrote: On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Why not just decide to move the Jakarta Commons projects to Commons and the Sandbox ones to Incubator? This is not a proposal for a diktat, but a *suggestion* for Jakarta Commons projects to take part of the Commons and I