Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 20:27 07.12.2002 +0100, you wrote:

Pier Fumagalli wrote:


You're free to file your complaint to the appropriate department dealing
with those kinds of issues: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Naaah. There's a difference between making a remark here when the 
opportunity is there, and starting another 'feeding the trolls' thread 
over at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I now see that my remark has been duly noted, and I can only hope that it 
somehow penetrates the firewall between us and The Members.

I think the tradition of meritocracy is deeply rooted in our
collective consciousness; I mean that of Apache. If you knock on the
door of [EMAIL PROTECTED], I am sure you will be allowed in. Things
do not necessarily become easier as a member, one still has to work on
listening, understanding and persuasion, exactly the same way a
a committed committer would.

Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see how you are
received. Note the CC: to licensing@.



/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/


--
Ceki



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread Steven Noels
Ceki Gülcü wrote:


I think the tradition of meritocracy is deeply rooted in our
collective consciousness; I mean that of Apache. If you knock on the
door of [EMAIL PROTECTED], I am sure you will be allowed in. Things
do not necessarily become easier as a member, one still has to work on
listening, understanding and persuasion, exactly the same way a
a committed committer would.


- thanks for the pointer, I already tried subscribing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
which obviously was the wrong address
- subscribing/posting: from what I see, it looks like my subscription is 
waiting to be moderated - excellent
- things being 'easier' when being a member: of course not, and I hope 
that wasn't the impression that I gave

Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see how you are
received. Note the CC: to licensing@.


Thanks for the invitation - I'll post my questions to the licensing list.

/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java  XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at  http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 12:23 09.12.2002 +0100, Steven Noels wrote:

Ceki Gülcü wrote:

- things being 'easier' when being a member: of course not, and I hope 
that wasn't the impression that I gave

The message I was trying to get across was that the firewall
a.k.a. barrier between members and committers exists mostly in
people's minds. Membership is not much more than a recognition of
one's work plus a stamp of approval for being usually reasonable.
Think of membership as even more positive karma in slashdot. From the
Foundations perspective membership also entails responsibilities and
obligations but that's a different topic.



/Steven


--
Ceki



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread Steven Noels
Ceki Gülcü wrote:


The message I was trying to get across was that the firewall
a.k.a. barrier between members and committers exists mostly in
people's minds. Membership is not much more than a recognition of
one's work plus a stamp of approval for being usually reasonable.
Think of membership as even more positive karma in slashdot. From the
Foundations perspective membership also entails responsibilities and
obligations but that's a different topic.


In people's mind is where thoughts come to fruition and actions are 
decided.

It's just that I don't like it when a discussion gets cut off by someone 
 using that imaginary firewall as a reason - even adding a redirect to 
some other place where it is deemed more appropriate for the discussion 
to be held. Oh well ;)

/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java  XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at  http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread James Taylor
 - things being 'easier' when being a member: of course not, and I hope 
 that wasn't the impression that I gave
 
 The message I was trying to get across was that the firewall
 a.k.a. barrier between members and committers exists mostly in
 people's minds. Membership is not much more than a recognition of
 one's work plus a stamp of approval for being usually reasonable.
 Think of membership as even more positive karma in slashdot. From the
 Foundations perspective membership also entails responsibilities and
 obligations but that's a different topic.

It is a real barrier in that things seem less opaque for members. You
can tell people that nothing important happens on the members only
lists, but as long as there _are_ members only lists and such, the
firewall will always be percieved.

-- jt, observing not complaining.




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 07:40 09.12.2002 -0500, James Taylor wrote:

 - things being 'easier' when being a member: of course not, and I hope
 that wasn't the impression that I gave

 The message I was trying to get across was that the firewall
 a.k.a. barrier between members and committers exists mostly in
 people's minds. Membership is not much more than a recognition of
 one's work plus a stamp of approval for being usually reasonable.
 Think of membership as even more positive karma in slashdot. From the
 Foundations perspective membership also entails responsibilities and
 obligations but that's a different topic.

It is a real barrier in that things seem less opaque for members. You
can tell people that nothing important happens on the members only
lists, but as long as there _are_ members only lists and such, the
firewall will always be percieved.


Many things remain opaque for members because new members do not
suddenly become omniscient. The phenomena of community legends exists
within Apache as within any community with some history. What sets
Apache apart from other communities is its built in open and tolerant
nature.  Openness is a hard term to define. IMO, the ability to speak
up and argue on almost any matter without fear of retribution makes
Apache open.

You will not find a single member claiming that important business is
conducted on the members list. The argument of members only mailing
lists preventing committers from gaining access to important
information does not hold water unless one assumes that all ASF
members are irredeemable liars united in a conspiracy against the poor
committers.

Some say that perception is everything. If perception is everything,
then reason and truth do not matter.  As far as I am concerned, reason
and truth are everything with perception a distant contender. After
all, we all perceive the earth to be flat which does not make the
earth any less spherical.

What is great about Apache is that a good argument and some
perseverance will get you a long way. That is a fact.  Status matters
but less than one would imagine. My disappointment with Apache was
that occasionally you get a very persistent person who convincingly
promotes bad ideas. Although some may see that and not agree, they
eventually throw in the towel. It then takes the community months or
even years to realize that the idea was bad. Of course, the problem
does stem from the open nature of the ASF but rather from the
imperfections of *any* conceivable system. The bottom line is that we
should not mistake the failings of the system with our own PGL
syndrome (paranoia, greed and laziness).


-- jt, observing not complaining.


--
Ceki, expounding not accusing.




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-09 Thread Steven Noels
Ceki Gülcü wrote:

snip/


--
Ceki, expounding not accusing.


Very nicely put.

/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java  XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at  http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]