Re: Ontology-based portals - RDF, LDAP, Xindice (was: java@apache)

2003-12-26 Thread Santiago Gala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El viernes, 26 dici, 2003, a las 07:06 Europe/Madrid, Noel J. Bergman escribió: J.Pietschmann wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a project, providing its name, resource (www, scm,

Re: java@apache

2003-12-26 Thread Santiago Gala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El viernes, 26 dici, 2003, a las 01:32 Europe/Madrid, Henri Yandell escribió: On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a project, providing its name,

Re: [License] for jars in CVS

2003-12-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 24, 2003, at 5:47 PM, Danny Angus wrote: In the case of most of the licences we'd be likely to consider in this context it is usually perfectly OK to distribute Jars in a distribution because that gives you the opportunity to comply with licence conditions regarding distribution of their

cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs/site binindex.xml news.xml

2003-12-26 Thread cutting
cutting 2003/12/26 10:24:57 Modified:docs index.html docs/site binindex.html news.html xdocsindex.xml xdocs/site binindex.xml news.xml Log: Announce Lucene 1.3 release. Revision ChangesPath 1.353 +1 -1

Re: [License] for jars in CVS

2003-12-26 Thread Phil Steitz
Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: I am with Erik on no JARs in CVS. Unless it is a legal issue, I would certainly like to distribute all JARs with the distribution. It saves a lot of hassle and keeps uncessary traffic out of the user-list. At the expense of lots of wasted bandwidth and disk space. I

Re: Indemnification of the PMC

2003-12-26 Thread Stephen McConnell
Geir : If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the same as a motion passed by the BOD. It is my understanding the BOD has not passed any resolution that grants a PMC member any of the rights implied by the message quoted below. In fact, my understanding is that the

RE: Indemnification of the PMC

2003-12-26 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stephen McConnell wrote: If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the same as a motion passed by the BOD. Correct. In fact, my understanding is that the role of PMC implies no rights at all - just extra responsibility. Is there anything concrete to suggest