RE: Need help on groups in jetspeed
Hi any idea about groups/roles are assigned.i cannot understand how the concept of groups in jetspeed. With regards Naveen -Original Message- From: Santiago Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:12 PM To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: Need help for BadURL Portlet example El martes, 27 ener, 2004, a las 15:53 Europe/Madrid, KHADABADI, BASAVARAJ DUNDAPPA (SES-ISO) escribió: Hi, We are developing a webpage for our firm.For that we are using Jetspeed.I saw one BadURL Portlet example.I just want to know the working/flow of that portlet so that we can use it in our webpage. Expecting a reply from all of you. are you sure that you want a reply from all the subscribers to both lists? This means like 1000 persons. :-) Now, jokes aside, the question is better posted in the jetspeed-user list (you posted to jetspeed-user-help) Try again there. Regards, Santiago Thanks, Basavaraj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[test] ignore
sorry, please ignore or make pithy remarks. all apache mail has stopped getting into my inbox for the last day. bizarre. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Name Jakarta
Howdy, I was going to put this in the tomcat FAQ until I noticed it was in the wikipedia ;) An interesting web page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_term_etymologies Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:45 PM To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: The Name Jakarta Quoting Uncle Roastie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why/how was the name Jakarta choosen? Thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was the name of the conference room at Sun where a large number of the discussions about the original formation of the project, as well as the contribution of Tomcat from Sun to Apache, took place. I guess the name sort of stuck. Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect
If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] for all our existing code? Will someone need to look up the original author and all updaters in CVS? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2004 12:01:01 PM: Hello, Jakarta-Folks, Just a note (but very important) ++ brief summary ++ The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/. The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for further instructions on how to use the new license. - ++ description ++ The 2.0 version of the Apache License was approved by the ASF (The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0) in 2004. The goals of this license revision have been to reduce the number of frequently asked questions, to allow the license to be reusable without modification by any project (including non-ASF projects), to allow the license to be included by reference instead of listed in every file, to clarify the license on submission of contributions, to require a patent license on contributions that necessarily infringe the contributor's own patents, and to move comments regarding Apache and other inherited attribution notices to a location outside the license terms (the NOTICE file [1]). The result is a license that is compatible with other open source licenses, such as the GPL, and yet still remains true to the original goals of the Apache Group and supportive of collaborative development across both nonprofit and commercial organizations. All packages produced by the ASF will be implicitly licensed under the Apache License, version 2.0, unless otherwise explicitly stated. For more information, see Apache Licenses Page [2] [1] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt [2] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - You can also read this above from here: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/elsewhere.html#20040121.1 Sincerely, - Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect
So far I've just heard that all new releases must be using the new licence post March 1st 2004. Though doesn't hurt to sweep through CVS updating as time allows. Hen On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] for all our existing code? Will someone need to look up the original author and all updaters in CVS? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2004 12:01:01 PM: Hello, Jakarta-Folks, Just a note (but very important) ++ brief summary ++ The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/. The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for further instructions on how to use the new license. - ++ description ++ The 2.0 version of the Apache License was approved by the ASF (The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0) in 2004. The goals of this license revision have been to reduce the number of frequently asked questions, to allow the license to be reusable without modification by any project (including non-ASF projects), to allow the license to be included by reference instead of listed in every file, to clarify the license on submission of contributions, to require a patent license on contributions that necessarily infringe the contributor's own patents, and to move comments regarding Apache and other inherited attribution notices to a location outside the license terms (the NOTICE file [1]). The result is a license that is compatible with other open source licenses, such as the GPL, and yet still remains true to the original goals of the Apache Group and supportive of collaborative development across both nonprofit and commercial organizations. All packages produced by the ASF will be implicitly licensed under the Apache License, version 2.0, unless otherwise explicitly stated. For more information, see Apache Licenses Page [2] [1] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt [2] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - You can also read this above from here: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/elsewhere.html#20040121.1 Sincerely, - Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Name Jakarta
Despite any rumors to the contrary, Jakarta being the capital of Indonesia on the island of Java had nothing to do with it either ;-) -Brian On Jan 27, 2004, at 10:45 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Uncle Roastie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why/how was the name Jakarta choosen? Thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was the name of the conference room at Sun where a large number of the discussions about the original formation of the project, as well as the contribution of Tomcat from Sun to Apache, took place. I guess the name sort of stuck. Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect
On Jan 28, 2004, at 9:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] for all our existing code? Will someone need to look up the original author and all updaters in CVS? Why? The Apache Software Foundation is the copyright owner for any and all code in ASF CVSs and projects. geir -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2004 12:01:01 PM: Hello, Jakarta-Folks, Just a note (but very important) ++ brief summary ++ The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/. The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for further instructions on how to use the new license. - ++ description ++ The 2.0 version of the Apache License was approved by the ASF (The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0) in 2004. The goals of this license revision have been to reduce the number of frequently asked questions, to allow the license to be reusable without modification by any project (including non-ASF projects), to allow the license to be included by reference instead of listed in every file, to clarify the license on submission of contributions, to require a patent license on contributions that necessarily infringe the contributor's own patents, and to move comments regarding Apache and other inherited attribution notices to a location outside the license terms (the NOTICE file [1]). The result is a license that is compatible with other open source licenses, such as the GPL, and yet still remains true to the original goals of the Apache Group and supportive of collaborative development across both nonprofit and commercial organizations. All packages produced by the ASF will be implicitly licensed under the Apache License, version 2.0, unless otherwise explicitly stated. For more information, see Apache Licenses Page [2] [1] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt [2] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - You can also read this above from here: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/elsewhere.html#20040121.1 Sincerely, - Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
License 2.0 URI inclusion
Howdy, I'm reading the license information page (http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/) and I was glad to see the license can be included as a reference URI instead of the full text (section 8 on the above page). My questions are: - Is there a preference/reason to pick the TXT over the HTML version? - http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 is OK for license 2.0. But it'd be nice if /licenses/LICENSE was symlinked to the current version, so that when ASF license 2.1 or 3.0 comes out we don't have to update all our source code. Is there such a symlink (the current /licenses/LICENSE is for 1.1)? - I've looked at the example NOTICE file (http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt). Since it's an HTTPD example, it has those paragraphs about NCSA, etc. If I'm writing the NOTICE file for a jakarta project that depends on other jakarta projects only, do I need to include them in the NOTICE file? Finally, is this the right place to ask/discuss this? Or do I need to subscribe to yet another mailing list, this time [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help for BadURL Portlet exampleReply
To the man with many names: I am learning all this so please have patience...I also am getting nready to hook up new Computer. Windows xp...prfessional...Everything should be ready to go once i figure out how to hook everything up...Java is installed...have lots of goodys...I just got it back from computer guy.. Thank you Melissa Wilder --- Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El martes, 27 ener, 2004, a las 15:53 Europe/Madrid, KHADABADI, BASAVARAJ DUNDAPPA (SES-ISO) escribió: Hi, We are developing a webpage for our firm.For that we are using Jetspeed.I saw one BadURL Portlet example.I just want to know the working/flow of that portlet so that we can use it in our webpage. Expecting a reply from all of you. are you sure that you want a reply from all the subscribers to both lists? This means like 1000 persons. :-) Now, jokes aside, the question is better posted in the jetspeed-user list (you posted to jetspeed-user-help) Try again there. Regards, Santiago Thanks, Basavaraj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Name Jakarta
That place is officially djakarta btw :) So I was never confused.. Mvgr, Martin On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:48, Brian McCallister wrote: Despite any rumors to the contrary, Jakarta being the capital of Indonesia on the island of Java had nothing to do with it either ;-) -Brian On Jan 27, 2004, at 10:45 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Uncle Roastie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why/how was the name Jakarta choosen? Thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was the name of the conference room at Sun where a large number of the discussions about the original formation of the project, as well as the contribution of Tomcat from Sun to Apache, took place. I guess the name sort of stuck. Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect
The ASF is the copyright holder.. Btw just moved a codehaus project to use v 2.0 :) Mvgr, Martin On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us some using instructions really quickly, e.g. what goes in Copyright [] [name of copyright owner] for all our existing code? Will someone need to look up the original author and all updaters in CVS? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2004 12:01:01 PM: Hello, Jakarta-Folks, Just a note (but very important) ++ brief summary ++ The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/. The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for further instructions on how to use the new license. - ++ description ++ The 2.0 version of the Apache License was approved by the ASF (The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0) in 2004. The goals of this license revision have been to reduce the number of frequently asked questions, to allow the license to be reusable without modification by any project (including non-ASF projects), to allow the license to be included by reference instead of listed in every file, to clarify the license on submission of contributions, to require a patent license on contributions that necessarily infringe the contributor's own patents, and to move comments regarding Apache and other inherited attribution notices to a location outside the license terms (the NOTICE file [1]). The result is a license that is compatible with other open source licenses, such as the GPL, and yet still remains true to the original goals of the Apache Group and supportive of collaborative development across both nonprofit and commercial organizations. All packages produced by the ASF will be implicitly licensed under the Apache License, version 2.0, unless otherwise explicitly stated. For more information, see Apache Licenses Page [2] [1] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt [2] - http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - You can also read this above from here: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/elsewhere.html#20040121.1 Sincerely, - Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help on groups in jetspeed
El miércoles, 28 ener, 2004, a las 11:15 Europe/Madrid, Naveen escribió: Hi any idea about groups/roles are assigned.i cannot understand how the concept of groups in jetspeed. Read the message you quoted: This is not the place, try [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this kind of questions. With regards Naveen Thanks in advance Santiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with mail Was: [test] ignore
El miércoles, 28 ener, 2004, a las 14:42 Europe/Madrid, Henri Yandell escribió: all apache mail has stopped getting into my inbox for the last day. bizarre. My mail *to* apache is getting slow, but I'm not seeing more than a couple hours delays. My mail *from* apache is arriving well. Brian acknowledged, at infrastructure@, problems dealing with the storm of viruses and rejection notices coming back from forged From addresses. he had to throttle qmail, which can cause delays and failed connections: I've limited incoming SMTP connections (...), and since we're effectively under DDoS attack that means there may be a delay before a valid message makes it into daedalus. I bet your problem is more your provider completely overwhelmed locally. Regards, Santiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with mail Was: [test] ignore
Nah, I funneled all my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email into another inbox [she was surprised at the amount of spam I get :) ] by accident. Fixed now and I only missed a little. Thanks, Hen On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Santiago Gala wrote: El miércoles, 28 ener, 2004, a las 14:42 Europe/Madrid, Henri Yandell escribió: all apache mail has stopped getting into my inbox for the last day. bizarre. My mail *to* apache is getting slow, but I'm not seeing more than a couple hours delays. My mail *from* apache is arriving well. Brian acknowledged, at infrastructure@, problems dealing with the storm of viruses and rejection notices coming back from forged From addresses. he had to throttle qmail, which can cause delays and failed connections: I've limited incoming SMTP connections (...), and since we're effectively under DDoS attack that means there may be a delay before a valid message makes it into daedalus. I bet your problem is more your provider completely overwhelmed locally. Regards, Santiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache License 2.0 came into effect
Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/01/2004 02:02:05 AM: The ASF is the copyright holder.. Not exclusively. The original author also retains copyright to any works as well, AFAIK. Btw just moved a codehaus project to use v 2.0 :) Mvgr, Martin -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
