http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=47711
Some of you will be excited, I am. I am still downloading, I hope you
have a spare box.
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
FC4 test1 include works provided in jpackage.org.
Suse 9.3 should do the same
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:17:39 -0600, NetSQL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=47711
Some of you will be excited, I am. I am still downloading, I hope you
have a spare box.
AFAICS they build with gij, which leaves me less than thrilled. Or to
quote James Gosling testing is very important. The Java test suites
contain 200.000 - 300.00 tests.
As long as gij doesn't come even close to pass the certification tests,
I'm not really interested in building my business on
At 12:49 AM -0500 3/16/05, Henri Yandell wrote:
(though seeing a tag doc in javadoc style would rock).
Have you seen
https://taglibrarydoc.dev.java.net/
It is used, for example, to generate this:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/jstl/1.1/docs/tlddocs/
There's a Maven plugin which is savvy about
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
As long as gij doesn't come even close to pass the certification tests,
I'm not really interested in building my business on it.
I still plan to use jRockit VM 1.5 (you can use Sun 1.5 if you like)
but I realy hope that GNU Classpath (and GCC/GCJ) catch up.
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 01:53 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following page looks very dated, and I suspect utterly dead:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html
I'd like to kill it, and will do if I hear no -1's by Friday evening.
+1
- robert
Date: 2005-03-16T20:04:49
Editor: MichaelBecke
Wiki: Jakarta Wiki
Page: JakartaBoardReport-March2005
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-March2005
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -64,6
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:49:08 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interested in finding out if anyone else thinks this would be a good idea.
Rather than have each subproject managing their release javadocs
separately, I think it would be good if we treated the javadoc more
