Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Danny Angus
I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members : 39 For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP. I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result of all the reorganisation, and wasn't killed

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote: I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members : 39 For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP. I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result of

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ -=-=-=-= Mostly I'm worried about: PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful) PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon) Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+) snap/ s/Inactive/Active/ ?

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ -=-=-=-= Mostly I'm worried about: PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful) PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon) Inactive committers who are not on

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote: I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members : 39 For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP. I hung around

RE: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Danny Angus wrote: I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even if I only post when I have

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Danny Angus wrote: I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin van den Bemt wrote: The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) : - Leave it as is - Move them to emuritus Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving to emeritus and back, but

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) : - Leave it as is - Move them to emuritus Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving

Re: Notice of intent.... #2

2006-01-12 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Phil Steitz wrote: Hopefully we can keep it at a point where the groups are really just there to refine the flow of mail, not to separate it. HttpComponents is an example of this (though not a good one as most of its components came from HttpClient). WebComponents (formerly hoped to be known

Re: Notice of intent.... #2

2006-01-12 Thread Tim OBrien
--- Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example: - HttpComponents - WebComponents - LibraryComponents (narrowAPI-deep) - BaseComponents (broadAPI-shallow) Explain that narrowAPI-deep, braodAPI-shallow business.