RE: [VOTE] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1 (non-binding) What about the domrant commons-test? I already tried to reactivate the project, but due to a current lack of time I stopped this for now. Nevertheless I have a proposal in my outbox for an official attempt to reactivate it. - Jörg Felipe Leme wrote on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6

Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-20 Thread Dion Gillard
+1. It could also be a home to latka, which is out of place here in jakarta-commons. On 4/21/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The options are: > > > > [X] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the > new TLP > > [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but

[Jakarta Wiki] Update of "TLPCactusAndJMeter" by MartinvandenBemt

2006-04-20 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by MartinvandenBemt: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/TLPCactusAndJMeter -

Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-20 Thread Martin van den Bemt
The options are: [X] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP [ ] +0 it does not matter to me [ ] -1 I am against it because Same motivation as Yoav and Rahul.. Mvgr, Marti

Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-20 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Felipe Leme schrieb: [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP [ X] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP [ ] +0 it does not matter to me [ ] -1 I am against it because Best regards Henn

Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-20 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 4/18/06, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ X ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new > TLP > [ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new > TLP > [ ] +0 it does not matter to me > [ ] -1 I am against it because