of
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html, especially with respect to
what you've labeled binary voting
- Rod
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and update the PMC bylaws to reflect current reality:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
meaning of consensus around here.
Also, we may want to reference or crib bits of
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html, especially with respect to
what you've labeled binary voting
- Rod
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and update the PMC bylaws
sure the cracks in the beauty of the current setup is as obvious to
all as it is to me.
Once we've described the current situation, we can then move to simplify
it.
Hen
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
Ah, good point. I chose a bad word :)
Will change 'consensus' to 'community
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:
3. it'd probably be a good idea to refer to another document containing
voting guidelines which could be changed more frequently without board
approval.
I can't see anything suggesting we need
Due to the change of chair last month, we were allowed to defer a month on
our report to the board. However it's now a month later, so nearly time to
make said report (Wednesday is the meeting).
My current draft is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport_2dJuly2004
I'll be
I was originally signing packages on the Apache server (as I wasn't used
to installing PGP on machines I setup for dev work). It was recommended
repeatedly that I get them off as it is a risk to the quality of the
authentication.
Hen
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I wish we
While a single page is necessary for the casual browser, why would a user
of Tomcat, who wants to download Tomcat 5, want to goto a list of many
other subprojects?
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/maven/binaries/maven-1.0.zip
seems to be far more of what a user would want to see. However,
Apologies for this Gary, but I think you won't mind.
Release news goes higher up, so when Commons Codec is out, it can just
appear at the top. It's not a big deal as it's very easy for me to collate
the releases from the front page.
I'm also aiming to only have subprojects listed (HttpClient
The front page to Jira seems up to me, but I can't click on
Jetspeed (which is Paul's JIRA link below).
You might be getting OutOfMemory's perhaps.
The Maven user list appears to be up and fine however.
Hen
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:17:03 -0400
From:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Do, den 08.07.2004 schrieb Martin Cooper um 1:09:
I think you are arguing against yourself here. ;-) If the people who can
make changes should be the same people doing the monitoring, which seems
to be what you are saying, then it makes perfect
It's an example of complaining at people for not doing comments (I fully
admit I need to comment more myself). Took a while to notice that the one
below is a spelling fix for committe.
I wonder if we can configure wiki to make the comment mandatory :)
Hen
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Rainer Klute
) and I want to make it more obvious.
Hen
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Do, den 08.07.2004 schrieb Martin Cooper um 1:09:
I think you are arguing against yourself here. ;-) If the people who can
make changes should be the same people
Yep, would be good to know who's been adding it (though not that many
obvious brazillian names on the list, so might be easy to guess :) ).
Seems a bit odd to me. It looks like Apache Brazil and not Jakarta Brazil.
Very little there about Jakarta.
Apparantly the top line is:
Either welcome,
translation spam
bots have seen the light ?
mvgr,
Martin
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 18:37, Henri Yandell wrote:
Doing an automatic translation on this page yields complete crap.
Random gibberings of the insane (reminds me of the book I just read, the
author's persona within the book is of a man who
Have you already posted a version of your new page somewhere so we can
look/complain?
What's your next window for attempting it, and how long would you need to
freeze releases for (ie) rought estimate of how long infrastructure + you
will need)?
Hen
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, robert burrell donkin
== June ==
=== Status ===
As might be becoming clear now, Geir has handed the position of PMC chair
over to Henri Yandell (writing this). The following is a (somewhat bare)
report on the month of June to the Jakarta community. One of the chair's
roles is to provide a report to the ASF board
As the wiki-update emails don't seem to get through to this list, thought
I'd let people know I've done a bit of reorganization of the Jakarta Wiki
page:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/
I've also added a bunch of ideas and thoughts.
As I now have the responsibility of sending a quarterly
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As the wiki-update emails don't seem to get through to this list
No one ever added the address to the allow list, so they are all pending in
the moderator queue. And the sole moderator is rather busy right now. So
if the PMC would like to
Heh, I happily dealt with a moderation without even noticing :) Thanks.
Is it possible to get a list of moderators to the Jakarta mail lists so we
can see where we're thin on coverage?
Hen
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Please add me for both [EMAIL
I suspect what you want is the .exe on:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
that's listed under Tomcat 5.0.25.
If you have any problems, you might want to try asking them on the Tomcat
User list. Details on how to subscribe are on the mail list page:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
PROPOSAL
i'd like to shift all jakarta commons component downloads onto separate
pages which are linked from the main ones. i think that this will
prolong the useful life of the original page without really effecting
it's
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
If watchdog is dead, we should move it to the Graveyard.
Noel, you are the incubator guy, any ideas about starting this process
- what is involved, any previous threads on the subject.
First of all, I'm curious to know what you think incubation
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
OK, then let me propose this:
- We give Danny Angus and myself karma for Watchdog. There are no
active committers to nominate us.
+1
+1 Let's just go ahead and do this. :-)
+1.
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, David Sean Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been reading through the licensing and Im not entirely sure if
its compatible with the Apache license.
Let's assume for a moment that ASL and LGPL would be compatible. We
Afaik, the rule is that any apache committer can be granted access to the
sandbox without any kind of vote. It doesn't imply that you can't vote a
new commons committer in for a sandbox'd component.
It's in fact where the Commons concept comes into play. Said new committer
cannot help but be
Kind of related to the discussion on resources and to a query of mine to
the Commons list to mention news about a new book on Jakarta Commons, I've
put together a site that lists all [I think] the books on open source Java
projects.
http://www.osjava.org/pergamum/
Implementation wise, it's a
Sister resources doesn't sit well with me. It feels like a very odd phrase
of English. The only other one I know of is 'Sister Cities', which implies
a sense of equality between the cities.
Resources (Unofficial) gets my vote, as that lets us link in bits in our
own Wiki or personal apache
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Mar 19, 2004, at 4:52 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm still in disagreement. I'm founding a lot of this on the idea that
Groovy is a good fit for a JSR. There's no reason for more than one
implementation to exist that I can think
Ack'd. Will add you to the forthcoming vote.
Hen
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Mark Thomas wrote:
As a Tomcat committer, I would like to become a Jakarta PMC Member.
Many thanks,
Mark
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the info. What is the subscribe address for the
Probably best to mail to the geronimo list with the geronimo parts of
this, though some of the geronimo people are in jakarta.
I do have a todo to write 'simple-jms' which is a single-jvm, memory
implementation of the jms spec, but sounds like you've already got network
stuff in it, so more than
Are they the same product Yoav?
Messenger is a tool to make client JMS easier[i think], while the original
poster [you deleted the author's name *teasing*] seems to have a JMS
server.
Hen
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I saw this one too, but it doesn´t have the ASF
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Are they the same product Yoav?
Messenger is a tool to make client JMS easier[i think], while the
original
poster [you deleted the author's name *teasing*] seems to have a JMS
server.
;) I thought Messenger's Messagelet Engine is a
[X] +1 I support this proposal (Binding)
[ ] -1 I don't support this proposal
[ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 12:13, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(3.2) CVS repositories
The package shall use a root branch of the jakarta-hivemind CVS
repository.
Not Subversion?
Is there a pressing reason to go subversion?
Well, this is
Sounds good to me, I think Commons can work fine as a single Wiki.
Continues to allow for interesting inter-component relations. Taglibs also
fits well as a single Wiki.
+1 (PMC)
I'm unsure if either have a wiki, but am prepared to learn the necessaries
to migrate if need be.
Hen
On Fri, 27
I assume the fax number is the same as for CLAs, so Jim Jagielski.
No idea about process etc though.
Hen
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
Prashant faxed the HiveMind software grant last week, but we've heard no word of it
being recieved.
I'm anxious for this to happen so
Sounds like a very good idea to me. [+1]
Hen
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've now discovered that news from jakarta is being disseminated to a
wider audience. this is a good thing but a bit unexpected (at least to
me). this raises the issue that we do not - at the
I suspect the excuse is that root's been busy with all the email virus.
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list is where you can get this solved,
they're meant to be handling root-like tasks. Sandbox access should be
pretty easy to get [just ask on commons-dev mailing list] once you have
your password
sorry, please ignore or make pithy remarks.
all apache mail has stopped getting into my inbox for the last day.
bizarre.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So far I've just heard that all new releases must be using the new licence
post March 1st 2004.
Though doesn't hurt to sweep through CVS updating as time allows.
Hen
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If all licenses must be updated by March 1st 2004, you'd better get us
some
Nah, I funneled all my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email into another inbox
[she was surprised at the amount of spam I get :) ] by accident. Fixed now
and I only missed a little.
Thanks,
Hen
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Santiago Gala wrote:
El miércoles, 28 ener, 2004, a las 14:42 Europe/Madrid, Henri
A vote is on-going at the moment [ends Sunday] for 20 or so people, but
I've not heard of any movement on the plans to increase in a more
aggressive way.
Hen
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Anything happening in this regard?
-Harish
Costin Manolache wrote:
Ted Husted
waiting addition to the committee-info.
Ideas?
Hen
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Thanks, will results be posted here?
-Harish
Henri Yandell wrote:
A vote is on-going at the moment [ends Sunday] for 20 or so people, but
I've not heard of any movement on the plans to increase
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I don't understand why anything but the actual vote needs to be in
private.
There should probably be a public nomination list with reasons for hand
picking (if hand picked) and a public results list
If you are nominated and not elected people
A Maven repo that the Apache people can commit to is definitely something
that I would like to see happen, however, although ASF want control of
such a thing, they don't want to suffer all the bandwidth costs.
Why not discuss the following with the Maven guys over at iBiblio:
a directory at
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:23:28 -0500
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Everything is back on the private list again. Odd to discuss including
more people in the PMC while excluding them from the discussion.
It is inappropriate and inconsiderate to
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:13:59 -0500
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
If I were the chair of the Jakarta PMC and a board member and favored seeing
Jakarta split up into TLPs, I'd do this:
1. Put everyone on the PMC
2. Get them in a reorganization
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Right now, the only plan seems to be to nominate committers one-by-one
on the PMC list. I'm just saying that we shouldn't play favorites. I
believe all Jakarta committers have already earned membership in the
PMC; we should tender the offer to every
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a
project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations,
ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that
Agreed on the -1 for the proposal's subject line, yet +1 to Stephen's
suggestions of preparing Wiki resources for Jakarta sub-projects that want
to move to TLP-ness.
I do plan to proactively encourage TLP status for Commons, but as a
Commons committer. As a Taglibs committer I'm happy where it
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This could be interesting, Henri. If we had an formal description of a
project, providing its name, resource (www, scm, wiki, etc.) locations,
ontological classifications, etc., I imagine that could be useful in
As I just happened to notice this on Incubator [AltRMI in fact]:
Is all source code distributed by the project covered by one or more of
the following approved licenses: Apache, BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C,
MPL 1.1, or something with essentially the same terms?
The below is, to my quick
(I need to get a real sleep schedule)
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/japache/ is a list of all Java projects at
Apache that I found.
Am just pondering ways in which to display all of them on one site, and
thought I'd share.
Hen
Post a list of projects and get PMC people to volunteer to post reports,
chase up CLAs and improve PMC-to-non-PMC ratio, and record who has
volunteered. Keep going until all projects are covered by the minimum
number, which can be 1 to start with.
Hen
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Make release managers the default stewards
My suggestion:
Work out what people on the PMC are members of the PMC for. ie) I consider
myself a Taglibs and Commons developer [both umberella projects so not
great examples].
List which projects people are
Before doing this, I'd like to see a final list of nominations on PMC.
Then I'd like to see if they are accepted, as not all of them were
self-nominations, before going to the General list.
Hen
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I invite each candidate to create a new subject
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El jueves, 18 dici, 2003, a las 15:52 Europe/Madrid, Henri Yandell
escribió:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html lists the PMC members up
until the previous addition of 20 or so
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 18, 2003, at 9:30 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
As a slight aside, getting on the PMC list just means nudging an
existing
member and pointing out that you are an active committer to Jakarta.
Who's the best
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Danny Angus wrote:
Do you feel that we'll still be an open source organization in more than
name if all decisions end up being made on private PMC lists not open to
the
public?
For the record I'm in favour of transacting business HERE.
But I would like to respond
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
If the aim of the PMC is to house a vast majority of committers, and if
the role of a PMC member is simply to follow some guidelines and
regulate development, I don't see the distinction between a PMC member
and a committer. If the PMC
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
If the aim of the PMC is to house a vast majority of committers, and if
the role of a PMC member is simply to follow some guidelines and
regulate development, I
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I would have embraced that idea a year ago, but when discussed it was said
to not be an option to have a hierarchy of PMCs below the Jakarta PMC of 7
members.
There is a difference between a hierarchy and a confederation
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 18, 2003, at 3:14 PM, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Hi,
I, Harish Krishnaswamy (harishkswamy), a Tapestry committer, would
like to help grow Jakarta in whatever capacity I can and I request my
nomination for PMC membership.
Hey
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Dirk Verbeeck wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 18, 2003, at 9:30 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
As a slight aside, getting on the PMC list just means nudging an
existing
member and pointing out that you are an active committer
that fits well [Cocoon is
Java web development, but only indirectly I think, ditto for Avalon].
Hen
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
How about Jakarta = Java Development? Then, they all seem in place, no?
-Harish
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Costin Manolache wrote
Multiple PMCs is not a problem. There are James, Maven people on the
Jakarta PMC etc.
The idea below still concerns me. If all the PMC's share the same website,
who is responsible for the website as a global concept. For example, the
need to do mirrors.
If a Jakarta-Site PMC exists, all other
subjects have been:
how the PMC should work
organising a vote or something for a new pmc chair [5 or 6 people nominated so far]
how to ensure oversight of jakarta
general ramblings about jakarta futures in terms of TLPs and whether
social pressure should ever be applied to move a project to
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote:
Or even better - since jakarta has a single PMC, it could also have a single
list of committers ( most of them in the single PMC ).
Each PMC member can vote about any jakarta issue - including releases of
each sub-project, etc. If the distinction
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(i'm a little inclined towards db but) i'd support a proposal from the
JCS team for a future in either db or jakarta (along the lines outlined
above). guys - have you come to any opinions about what's the best
option yet?
My only worry with
So your preference, as the development-community of JCS, is for a
top-level-jakarta project, ie) at the log4j level?
If so, we can take that up with the PMC and see what views there are. As
the development community, your (and James) views count a lot, though the
smallness of community is the
Sounds like the basic problem is lack of community.
Getting community involves publicity and time. Publicity involves web
presence and a release.
Unless the rest of the turbine community are highly interested in JCS, I'd
suggest that joining Commons is the best way for you to gain community.
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Rice, Joe wrote:
I'm doing a school project on Jakarta and it's Open Source process. I've
read everything that I could find online and still had a few questions:
1. The PMC bylaws say that there are only 7 PMC members. But the credits
page lists 38 people for the
list and the whoweare to compare tomorrow night.
This marks the end of this special limited offer.
Hen
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
[in case it's not obvious, this email pertains only to Jakarta committers]
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html is the informal way
Slightly OT for us at Jakarta, but would it be worth us requesting that
infrastructure guys do this by default?
Any person getting an apache account has another email address, so if it
by default sets up a .forward as a part of the new user creation process,
it'll save a lot of this pain.
Hen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, mohammad nabil wrote:
Vic,
Notwithstanding your arguments this is not the appropriate forum for this.
This list is for project management discussion regarding the Jakarta
project.
Geronimo is not under the jursidiction of the Jakarta project.
If you want to make
Daft question, possibly, but could someone summarise the IP issue that was
happening over HiveMind and how it is currently resolved.
I've not been following the thread, but I've seen the noise. Is everything
squared away and happy?
Hen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Nayak, Prashant wrote:
Proposal
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
I think that this is the right list, very few people are intrested about
the incubator. This is about ASF reputation. (It is also about the OSS
reputation, including BSD, Linux, CodeHus, etc.)
Why not mail the httpd list then? Or the Ant list?
So this proposal is dependent on the grant?
Any time line on that?
[not trying to get in the way, jsut to do the pmc-thing]
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The offending IP has been taken off-line: this includes the HiveMind CVS
repository, the temporary downloads directory and
Cool. Could this be added as a note to the proposal? As a dependency or
whatever.
Hen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From talking with Prashant, the grant is in-progress. Given that these discussions
tend to ramble on for a couple of weeks, I think the grant will be ready long
Quoting:
Note: the current code base reflects an alternate package name,
org.apache.commons.hivemind. Subsequent research has shown that
HiveMind is not a suitable candidate for the Jakarta Commons. The
existing code base will be migrated to the new package during the
transition out of the
[for amusement value. mine mainly. i don't speak for apache in any way]
I too call on Greg to move to Resin. Not that it'll run Python there
either, but it'll not run Python faster on port 80.
I call on Vik to increase his monthly flames to be once a week, the
userbase is demanding more of your
[in case it's not obvious, this email pertains only to Jakarta committers]
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html is the informal way for
Jakarta to let the users know who we are.
When you become a Jakarta committer, it is hoped that you will add your
name and even a description if you so
Depends what you mean by compatible.
[IANAL..]
BSD licence is a effectively a template licence. ASL is effectively the
Apache-instance of a BSD licence. Anything under an ASL licence is owned
by Apache.
BSD licences are compatible with GPL licences in that if a GPL licence
uses a BSD compnent,
your forum carefully.
on
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
Hen
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
Will fix.
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Rick Moen wrote:
I realise it's difficult to discern legitimate mail from spam, etc.
arriving at webmaster aliases, but this request has been
What's the plan for this? [The redirect we have on the index.html at
the moment].
When are we going to remove it. How do we ensure that people don't blow it
away when they push up news for a release?
I did:
cp index.html redirect.html
cp index2.html index.html
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL
Some views:
You have a large blob of code with a small number of developers. Some
suggest this means you need to get a sourceforge project and get a
community going there, but I think that's poor if that's the only way.
My recommendation is that you find 3 Apache committers to sponsor your
Just thought I'd point out that the Apache Newsletter is sharing namespace
with http://www.apacheweek.com/. I've no idea what that's relationship is
to ASF. I've been getting it for years and only just realised that it's
not from apache.org.
So you might have some confused readers.
Hen
On Fri,
That's all very well and good. But why do I have to read the rules to go
look at the archives?
That frustrates me every time I want to search the archives.
Hen
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Danny Angus wrote:
I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't advise
changing it
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Alex McLintock wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
At 16:28 17/07/03, Erik Price wrote:
Spoken out loud, I use Apache Web Server and in writing I use Apache
HTTPD. Once the context is clear (that I am referring to the software
and not the organization), I typically
+1
Howard for King
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
+1
On 7/3/03 4:59 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but
I don't know if it
every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
+1 if I could just think of a BUSINESS PROPOSAL that could put this to
use
Let me help you get started:
Hello honored sir, my name is Mkwila Mnembi, and I am the
Is this reply FAQ/Wiki'd somewhere?
Seems to me to be a good set of questions to ask of an LGPL project to
cause happiness all around. Assuming it's okay with the powers that be,
boards/committees/usuals.
Hen
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits linking
and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users, etc etc? Is
he the copyright holder?
If so than you should be good to go (from my
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Sam said that we should obtain nominations for chair
from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
the 16th, followed by [a]n election where every
member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
the 18th.
Does http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html represent the PMC as it
currently is, or does it need updating?
What's the status of:
Future steps will include introduction of a concept of an emeritus PMC
member, reinstating prior PMC members who are still active. ?
[Sam Ruby, Jan 16th, PMC
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Does http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html represent the PMC as it
currently is, or does it need updating?
From the ASF's perspective, the official list is in the 'committers'
cvs repository in a file named board
Ok ok. Done.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I've updated the site from the file. Btw, Thomas Mahler's name is not in
alphabetical order in the file.
You updated the site but you didn't update the file? Are you waiting
for permission or something
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, now for my question : The dependancies for many projets are
pretty much the same, projets come with the jars they depend on
(and some do not) which makes for a lot of duplication. Is there a quick
way around this, a quick way to avoid
at compile-time maybe :)
But you still end up with jar duplication, you just get to avoid having to
think about it too much when compiling.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Paulo Silveira wrote:
You are looking for MAVEN, thats it
Jar duplication is history
I'm guessing it is:
EclipseProfiler
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eclipsecolorer/
Built in profiler
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Stéphane Mor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:49:40AM -0500, otisg wrote:
I don't know of any commercial profilers
that open source developers can use,
501 - 600 of 677 matches
Mail list logo
