If everyone is ok with it, I will send the current state of this page as the
board report ?
Mvgr,
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org
To: general@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:45:42 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern /
Rome /
Looks good..
+1
Mvgr,
Martin
sebb wrote:
Trying yet again ... votes needed (positive or negative) - thanks!
The licence issues reported by Henri have (I trust) been fixed.
Also the lib/opt directory is now included in the source archives.
To rebuild or test JMeter, you need to unpack
Do you by default run RAT on releases ?
Mvgr,
Martin
sebb wrote:
I'll be doing another build to try and address the issues raised so far.
In the meantime, please continue to report any further problems that
may be seen - thanks!
== December 2007 Board Report ==
=== Status ===
The downsizing of Jakarta continued this quarter.
HttpComponents became TLP and has finished moving all the resources to their
own TLP. We wish them
all the best with their new identity!
Slide was retired (see Slide section for more details), with
Jukka is not subsribed, but the reason there are 5 is to kind of limit the size
of the image (1
results in a huge image)
Mvgr,
Martin
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 1:14 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov
Hi everyone,
Since I suffered / suffering from a serious lack of time the last couple of
months (sorry about
that), I have in mind of doing some catching up at Apachecon :)
So it would be nice to meet up with everyone and have a discussion about things
todo, timelines, etc :)
I will arrive
Mojo plugins start out in the sandbox and need 3 votes from current committers
to promote to proper.
If you want to release a vote is expected to happen (I think apache voting
rules apply)
Mvgr,
Martin
Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
sebb wrote:
I don't see it as splitting the
.. So
probably best to figure out on infrastructure how to approach this specific
situation.
Mvgr,
Martin
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 21.06.2007, at 00:57, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Hi everyone,
The new Commons TLP was established today, with Torsten Curdt as Vice
President.
...so where do
+1 to keep httpclient and move it to httpcomponents.
Mvgr,
Martin
Roland Weber wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The commons one is probably less straight forward, although could be a lot
easier. Since there was a
commons in the past, it could well be that you don't need to do a lot
Hi everyone,
The new Commons TLP was established today, with Torsten Curdt as Vice President.
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've added it to the report..
Mvgr,
Martin
Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
... snip ...
BSF
MvdB :Silent quarter. A talk for Apachecon US was accepted (Rony Flatcher),
which will hopefully increase the user base (observation : since the user
list is also pretty quiet it can
== June 2007 Jakarta Board Report ==
=== Status ===
Another 2 projects have left Jakarta to live on their own : POI and Turbine
and both of almost (or completely) finished the move. I like to wish the
projects the best and a very good and long lasting future. In a seperate
mail there is a TLP
Cool I'll send it in this weekend.. And indeed adding people to the PMC will
not be a problem
afterwards. So no worries from my side that people are going to miss the boat..
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/11/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
The board
Hi everyone,
The board meeting is the 20th, so it would be nice if we can add the commons
TLP proposal for that
meeting.
So we probably need to finalize the proposal and send it off during the weekend.
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To
/velocity.apache.org/moving.html
Best regards
Henning
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 22:24 +0200, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Thanx for clearing it up, I was starting to doubt myself, since I did some
cleanup of old Jakarta
projects a couple of days ago (no worries, didn't touch POI
and /www/velocity.apache.org/moving.html
Best regards
Henning
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 22:24 +0200, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Thanx for clearing it up, I was starting to doubt myself, since I
did some cleanup of old Jakarta
projects a couple of days ago (no worries, didn't touch
I've fixed it.. Old dir structure under site3.
(just moved the old site directory to site3 and run svn update from the
/www/jakarta.apache.org
directory)
Mvgr,
Martin
Scott Eade wrote:
sebb wrote:
Not sure what's happened, but the .svn directories seem to have
disappeared from the directory
these
directories, all sites are built and deployed by maven anyway.
:-)
Best regards
Henning
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:32 +0100, sebb wrote:
Thanks; that's also fixed the missing updates.
I wonder how it happened?
S/
On 07/06/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL
Thanx for clearing it up, I was starting to doubt myself, since I did some
cleanup of old Jakarta
projects a couple of days ago (no worries, didn't touch POI and Turbine yet !)
Mvgr,
Martin
Thomas Vandahl wrote:
sebb wrote:
Thanks; that's also fixed the missing updates.
I wonder how it
Hi everyone,
The board meeting is going to be on the 20th (2 weeks from now).
So it's now time to add stuff to the
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current page :)
And maybe get the Commons TLP proposal out the door :)
Mvgr,
Martin
If you vote again your vote is binding too :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
sebb wrote:
However:
http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
says much the same, and seems to be policy.
As you can see from the SVN tag JCS_1_3 and the artifacts at my site,
your
Rony is a PMC member.. However the -1 of Sebb (which is binding and blocking)
is still there (unless
I missed his +1)..
Added Rony to the jakarta-pmc authorization file (thanx for spotting this)..
Mvgr,
Martin
Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Hi Roland,
Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I could not
whether or not to release. He can decide to
table the vote based on feedback, if so desired. (We had this issue in the
release of Velocity 1.5).
WILL
On 6/3/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rony is a PMC member.. However the -1 of Sebb (which is binding and
blocking
Full license text should go in LICENSE and attributions and notices in NOTICE..
Mvgr,
Martin
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well, I understand it differently and Thomas (probably looking at other
projects) did this too:
- LICENSE.txt contains the terms under which the software is licensed.
Added themselves to the TLP Proposal but didn't vote(?)
1. Jochen Wiedmann
2. Martin van den Bemt(*)
3. Matt Benson
4. Rory Winston(*)
5. Joerg Pietschmann
I voted +1, unless the goal is that commons becomes Jakarta in the end
To those trying to preserve Jakarta I say 'let go of Commons'. Don't abuse
Commons to try and save Jakarta. If the Jakarta name is worth saving, people
and community will form to save it. If not, then it will die. Thats normal
and natural.
Maybe not a reference to me, but in case it
My silence is because I think I made my preferred option quite clear way too
many times.
Mvgr,
Martin
Danny Angus wrote:
On 5/21/07, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread has been more quiet than I expected.
Actually, thinking about it, perhaps that's because we all think we
Ted Husted wrote:
Worse case, the Commons group could always go with Apache Jakarta
Commons. No one has objected to the re-use of the word Jakarta, and
more than one person has affirmed that it could be used.
That *you* don't see a problem in using the Jakarta name, doesn't mean no one
Danny Angus wrote:
On 5/21/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/21/07, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok Ownership is perhaps the wrong word, if Jakarta is being
disbanded who provides the oversight?
The same people who provide oversight for any ASF project: The people
Yep still feel that way. Projects that want to use the Jakarta name, should
just stay here till they
are the only one left and after that re-establish the Jakarta Project.
Mvgr,
Martin
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That *you* don't see a problem
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not just you :) It's just too early to do that at this stage,
since if it is just some
commits
as Teds says, it will be a dead horse. I don't need something formal
or something, but at
least get
some
and the
cycles to spare.
Starting to make it happen now feels like a waste of time, since the future of
Jakarta is by no way
set at this moment.
Mvgr,
Martin
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then take it to the next stage. Update the Jakarta home page
/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep still feel that way. Projects that want to use the Jakarta name,
should just stay here
till they
are the only one left and after that re-establish the Jakarta Project.
Mvgr,
Martin
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt
Flattened means : jakarta.apache.org/commons becomes jakarta.apache.org :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/21/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's pretty simple to solve this though (even though repeating
myself here
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's pretty simple to solve this though (even though repeating myself
here) : Let (a
flattened) commons become Jakarta..
Then why the concern about the use of Apache Jakarta Commons as a
project name?
When
If moving commons TLP is just a twisted (maybe a bad choice of a word) way to
come back to
jakarta.apache.org in the end, I am -1 on the TLP move..
We currently have 2 projects moving TLP (Turbine and POI) and after that we
need to start thinking
about every other project at Jakarta.
So if the
Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 01:06 +0200, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
If the new TLP is java-only it seems very rude to take the name
commons.apache.org : it's far too generic. Perhaps
jakarta-commons.apache.org would be appropriate..
Leaving means not using the Jakarta name
If the new TLP is java-only it seems very rude to take the name
commons.apache.org : it's far too generic. Perhaps
jakarta-commons.apache.org would be appropriate..
Leaving means not using the Jakarta name anymore.
Mvgr,
Martin
I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want
to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a
You are a Jakarta committer :)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It helps if people who want to move with POI to TLP add their names to the
proposal.
Mvgr,
Martin
David Fisher wrote:
I was thinking he was asking the same thing as you, but after composing
an email like yours, I realized Shawn was asking if after going to TLP
he would remain as a committer
Hi everyone,
The 16th of May is the next board meeting, so I was wondering if you were all
ready to go TLP at
this stage or if you prefer to wait for next months board meeting ?
Getting the approval done will not mean you have to move over everything
immediately (we are still
volunteers) and
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI
is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon,
lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this,
which is attached below.
This was yesterday evening at Apachecon Amsterdam.. We had a nice dinner and
Niall really showed his
excellence in speaking French :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Jean Carlo Salas wrote:
what?
On 5/2/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakarta BOF is scheduled at 9 PM right after
Jakarta BOF is scheduled at 9 PM right after the Incubator BOF.
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1...
Mvgr,
Martin
Scott Eade wrote:
The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the
Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top
level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a
vote to take place.
The proposal is
Hi everyone,
If someone wants to give a talk about a Jakarta project, there is an option of
doing that during the
feather tracks on Friday.
So if you think you have something useful to say about a Jakarta project,
please let me know (reply
to general is ok).
Even if it's just a single commons
Hi everyone,
A lot of things happening at Jakarta atm and even though I have some views on
where Jakarta could
end up, things are in no way set.
On thing that I think needs to be done is to establish what the health of your
project is. Which
means you have to look internal.
Things to consider
I've planned a Jakarta BOF for Apachecon EU.
Please increase the Interested People Counter on the
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/BirdsOfaFeatherEu07 page if you ar einterested
on having a BOF.
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe,
March 2007 Jakarta Board Report
Status
Activity seems to pick in projects that haven't been so active, so that's
really good news. Besides the releases and the code donation (see Cactus)
and the releases, there is nothing in particular that needs board attention
at this moment.
On a side note :
+1
I second Felipe's observations about Petar btw..
Mvgr,
Martin
Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer.
Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc
student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus
Hi Everyone,
The board report is due again (hopefully we can move back to a 3 month schedule
for the next time).
Please add anything noteworthy, like committer votes, releases (in the Release
section + a bit more
detailed transcipt of the release under your component) and other things you
want
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
I didn't know whether this had been done before in
Commons - but seems
that it has for the Commons CSV component back in
December 2005:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-commons-csv.html
Actually I
On another note : If there will be no mentors for the project from Jakarta, I
don't see a reason
that Jakarta be the sponsor of the project. Not that this is a documented
Incubator policy however,
but since 1) we have a lot of people who are allowed to be a member
Replace member with
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
I didn't know whether this had been done before in
Commons - but seems
that it has for the Commons CSV component back in
December
:)
Mvgr,
Martin
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
On 3/7/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
will come back to this on friday..
Mvgr,
Martin
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
Hello guys,
first of all let me introduce myself. My name is Petar Tahchiev and
I am
from Bulgaria.
I wanted to enroll
I know that you are busy, but I have another idea that came to me reading
the Matt Benson's post. In fact the guys are
dealing with a project that seems to be inspired the jakarta commons
Convert
project and so it would be possible to
accept the code without passing through the incubator.
All right,
I get it now. Thank you Martin. Yes, It sounds now more reasonable to move
in the incubator.
Sorry you didn't get it :) (probably me though, mailing too much today). I was
saying that I think
Cactus can gather enough votes in the current situation for eg a release (so
without a
I've already have a promise to help out Julius with incubation and am currently
am mentor for
Trinidad, so I don't think it is wise for me to add another effort to my list.
Mvgr,
Martin
Matt Benson wrote:
@Members:
I have recently joined the development
team of an OSS project, Morph, that
at the
sourceforge.netwhere we began testing. The point is that when we
wanted to apply the
changes in the
cactus trunk in the Apache repository we were adviced by Martin van den
Bemt
that we have to ask that the project be moved in the incubator first and
then when the
code is appropriate
It is short for the dutch Met vriendelijke groeten, which translates to
english as With kind
regards :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matt Benson wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Martin. BTW, and not to derail
my own topic, but what is Mvgr? :)
-Matt
--- Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
What exactly is the problem ? You have karma on Jakarta so you should be able
to commit...
Mvgr,
Martin
Michael Oliver wrote:
Hi,
I am a committer on the slide project and have been inactive for more
than six months and access is denied.
I now have several commits to make and need to
-Original Message-
From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 6:23 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: reinstatement
What exactly is the problem ? You have karma on Jakarta so you should be
able to commit...
Mvgr,
Martin
Michael Oliver
Hi everyone,
For various reasons there are a couple of projects at Jakarta that currently
don't have any
development community. I like these projects to have dev discussion move to
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
so it is easier for us to give oversight and guide newbies to learn the Apache
way.
The
Not a vote result, since it is just a conclusion from my side.
Jakarta hat on
Even though there are enough +1's to start sponsoring ssl, I think I want to
see a lot more support
than what I currently see (I mean active support). So at this stage I don't
think it is wise that
Jakarta should
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Not a vote result, since it is just a conclusion from my side.
Personal hat on
Since there are more (Apache) projects interested in ssl, I think however we
can get enough people
on board to do a successful incubation, so I offered to Julius to help him
out
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I think it is a bad idea. Either a project is alive or it is dead and
most of the dead are not coming back. The site, the project and
everything else should reflect this.
I suggest that:
1. ECS
2. ORO
3. Regexp
4. Alexandria (already does basically)
Was
Continuum has them..
See
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/continuum/continuum-1.0.1/continuum-web/src/main/resources/images/
Mvgr,
Martin
sebb wrote:
I'm looking for some icons suitable for use in a Swing JTree - so they
need to be GIF or PNG (I don't think SVG works).
I need the
Let's keep this statement your personal opinion on the fact that it is
not
relevant. I still like to
know the opinion of others.
If you want opinions, don't use a vote to collect them. This is a vote
thread, not an opinion thread. Votes within the ASF are for decision
making,
not
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the code
end up here)
[ ] Jakarta shouldn't
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[X] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the code
end
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on
that result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which
(=Martin van den Bemt) am currently in the process of informing
Petar on what actions to take (eg Code Grants/CLA/CCLA) to move
development back to the cactus project. When the paperwork is there,
we will run the code base through the incubator (at a minimum legal).
Commons
Switching from Maven-1
I've added it to the board template :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RolandWeber:
Last call for board report additions, I will post it on Sunday..
The current board report in progress will always be at
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi everyone,
I updated the site to have a link to apachecon amsterdam and messed up the
style of the site :(.
By accident I committed a local change that shouldn't have ended up in
subversion.
All fixed now, waiting for it to become live (just update
/www/jakarta.apache.org on people.
I also
Doesn't seem much, but haven't done anything with mail since Wednesday, so I am
seriously behind.
Will try to catch up during the weekend..
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hi Julius (learning here :),
Thanx for the comprehensive and well thought out mail..
Julius Davies wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Martin!
To reiterate (hopefully more clearly this time), I see two dilemmas
and two problems:
Dilemma #1:
--
You can't stop
Hi everyone,
Moving this from the private list to general (this is actually a spin of from a
thread about adding
a committer to an inactive project, hence that it was on private).
Definition list :
Inactive project = a project that has no *developer* community.
The Apache Way :
To become
Hi Julies,
Julius Davies wrote:
Hi, Martin, and Everyone,
If someone is interested in taking over a truly inactive project,
maybe they should fork and start their own SVN repository from their
own domain. The person should make it clear that their fork is in no
way sanctioned by Apache.
Gump doesn't build against the versions of the dependencies specified in the
pom / project.xml, but
builds against the latest of everything, which could mean other trouble if you
are using those jars.
Mvgr,
Martin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Ummwhy not out of Gump?
Phil Steitz wrote:
You received Joes mail ?
Mvgr,
Martin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :cat /usr/local/bin/svnpasswd
#!/bin/sh
echo Please visit https://svn.apache.org/change-password;
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:44 -0500, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
IIRC, this is my
:) Can you give me the error that you are getting, so I can ping infra with
something specific. I
checked your account in the svn authorization and couldn't find any mistakes
there, so probably has
to do with your password setting.
Mvgr,
Martin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
IIRC, this is my 4th
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jan 7, 2007, at 8:55 AM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Senthil S wrote:
Expecting a chart/graph making library from Apache
that is similar to jfreechart and has enhanced features to create
live and interactive graphs.
The question is: why do you think there
Just a reminder : the board report was written by me (completely) and the
feeling is something I
have and doesn't necessarily mean the whole of Jakarta agrees with that. The
board is aware that it
is my personal report.
Don't forget that in the first place this feeling (/ observation of this
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
[+1] Open up POI svn commit access.
[-1] Don't open POI svn commit access, because...
As long as the ASF (entity)/ Jakarta PMC have an WILL to protect
and can protect the developers from the Legal Issues,
I am willing to put +1 to this vote.
The biggest problem is
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
-1 from me.
Harmony doesn't let anyone commit on their project unless they they
sign a statement saying they haven't looked at Sun's source code[1].
AFAIK this is a similar issue and the POI policy [2] is designed to
protect POI, which as a user of POI is a good
Avik Sengupta wrote:
I dont care about this vote (any more). I do care deeply about POI. I
do care about Apache and Jakarta. I resent the opposite presumption on
less than rock-hard grounds, because it is a pretty big accusation.
As noted in my analyses, I stated that I could be
If you are lost in bad sentences let me know :)
Forgot to proof read :(
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Avik Sengupta wrote:
I dont care about this vote (any more). I do care deeply about POI. I
do care about Apache and Jakarta. I resent the opposite presumption on
less than rock
See inline.
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
It is fair to say that not many POI people participate in Jakarta.
However, to add perspective we never joined the Jakarta as it is -- we
joined Jakarta as it was...and one day this formed around us. It is
fair to criticize our build...it is pretty
Is this just your proposal or do other POI committers back this up ? (probably
in the text, but not
as clear as I like it to be).
If poi committers agree with this proposal, I like to hear them :)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To
Need to add here that for the TLP Proposal you also need a vote from Jakarta..
I'll try to shut up now :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
See inline.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 12/16/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 from me.
Harmony doesn't let anyone commit on their project unless they they
sign a statement saying they haven't looked at Sun's source code[1].
AFAIK this is a similar issue and the POI policy [2
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 12/17/06, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Niall,
Why is it any different than Harmony?
Harmony requires that an Authorized Contributor Questionnaire
be signed. The ACQ surely has been reviewd by the ASF legal team,
and signatures are legally
Hi Avik,
Avik Sengupta wrote:
Wow! The one weekend I decide not to check mail!! :)
I know what you mean :)
Am replying to the original message for convenience, but have read the
thread till this point.
Basically, the amount of negativity towards POI project in the thread
seems seems
Jakarta Board Report
First of all I like to mention that I haven't be able to spent the
time I wanted to spend, which is something I will try to improve.
I like to request special attention is given to the POI subproject
section in the report.
Another improvement should be that the majority of
Replying to myself :)
People I am doing something wrong. The board report should be created by the
committers, with a
personal note added from the Vice President (or in slang Chair). As you all can
see, I am the only
one who wrote it, which is 1) time consuming 2) icomplete (just have a look a
something was up there, but didn't have a look yet :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Replying to myself :)
People I am doing something wrong. The board report should be created
by the committers, with a
personal note added from the Vice President (or in slang Chair
made a proposal to promote POI now, I would expect the board
to reject it and tell us make POI work in Jakarta before you
promote it to TLP.
That is was my feeling as well, but I understood from the board that they
rather prefer that things
are not hidden in subprojects, which is something
Hi everyone,
The official way board reports should be handled has 2 parts : 1 part that is
edited by the the
committers (= the people who know best about there projects) and after that the
VP can add his
personal notes to the report.
So starting from now I would like to see that people add the
Feel free to remove it from commons and add it to HttpComponents. It was just a
dumb copy paste
from the commons webpage :) While you are at it, you could also add this to the
template (+ httpcode
and httpasync)
Mvgr,
Martin
Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
