[X] +1 I support this proposal
[ ] -1 I don't support this proposal
[ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal
Craig
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Quoting Christopher Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You're not saying that the boilerplate text should appear as comment in
every generated HTML document, are you?
Yes, I am. For the same reason that it's in every Java file.
Cheers,
Chris
Craig
Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:37:48 -0500
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
I have started a wiki page at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LicenseFormats for boilerplate text
in
different formats.
Cool and useful -- thanks ;)
Ditto. :-)
I'll try it
Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 +
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out
there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be
inclined to add both formulations.
Quoting Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In order to finally make an official mirrored release of Lucene 1.3, I
need jakarta-site karma so that I can update binindex and sourceindex.
Would the powers that be please grant me this?
Thanks,
Erik
Done.
Craig
Quoting Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ted Husted wrote:
Perhaps once most of the Committers are on the PMC list, we can move the
administrative nonsense there again, and let the General list be the General
list again :)
Looking forward to it. Do not remember when good flame
Quoting Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see what you are saying, but why is this an issue only with OGNL? Is it
because of license
incompatibilities? 'Cause there are other jars in CVS both Apache and
non-Apache.
Harish,
It isn't only an issue with OGNL, it is a general issue
Quoting Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask
the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8.
The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too
long without a public release.
[X] +1 I
Quoting Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release
[X] +1 I
Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Craig, this is elaborate, informative and puts the issue in my
perspective. May be this
should be put on the website too somewhere.
Here are my inferences so far...
inferences
ASF is a group of projects administered by the Apache
Quoting Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Then try this:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges
It aims to be a starter course on why discssions about PMCs, TLPs, Jakarta
and the ASF appear, and possibly how they affect you. Be aware of the
disclaimer
Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could someone please explain the motivation behind the creation of Jakarta
and how it got to where
it is today? May be that would help answer some of the questions we have?
-Harish
These comments are going to be (like anyone's would be)
Quoting Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Henri Yandell wrote:
If all the PMC's share the same website, who is responsible
for the website as a global concept. For example, the need
to do mirrors.
If a Jakarta-Site PMC exists, all other PMCs [jakarta sub-project based]
are
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Part of the proposal indicates the jakarta-commons is not the right home for
HiveMind, as it does not fit in with the charter of the commons (too many
dependencies, etc.).
Even if it were proposed that Hivemind stay in jakarta-commons, I do not share
Martin's
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Date: 04 Sep 2003 10:49:50 +0200
From: Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General Mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changes to the jakarta-site
Hi,
I'd like to put
Snipping to an issue I have with one particular comment.
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
In summary the most serious issues to this proposal are:
1. diversity of committership. I'd personally like to see 51% of the
ACTIVE committership from a different company. So long as a
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:44:26 -0500
From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the list
Currently,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Danny Angus wrote:
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:11:17 -
From: Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects
Although I've got karma I thought I should
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:09:14 -0500
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects?
Thanks Pier. Thats a
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:33:13 -0500
From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Karma request jakarta-site2
I'd like to join the
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:12:51 -0600
From: O'brien, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Karma request jakarta-site2
Was trying to add my name to the
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Timothy Halloran wrote:
Date: 10 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0500
From: Timothy Halloran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licensing again.
Does this mean the ASF has taken away the
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Ellis Teer wrote:
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:41:54 -0800
From: Ellis Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licensing again.
Ditto plus some,
Seeing the license issues discussed
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Dan Diephouse wrote:
4. Can ASF Projects use Sun BCL licensed products?
Yes, but ASF can't distribute them.
Each product you download from Sun's java.sun.com web site has a license
that you have to agree to in order to download that JAR. In the case of
several
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jeffrey Dever wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:22:01 -0500
From: Jeffrey Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No reply from root
I am the release prime for the commons-httpclient
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:52:12 +0100
From: Robert Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Forum Software.
Then how do you answer the following issues:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote:
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:31:32 -0800
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto
Alex McLintock wrote:
At 17:41 21/01/03, you
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:21:03 -0500
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property
Gump is now two years old. It has had contributions
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Tim Vernum wrote:
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:12:37 +1100
From: Tim Vernum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Short Apache licence for source files
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:17:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xdocs] Bug report (fwd)
I originally mentioned this on the
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, mohammad nabil wrote:
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:39:51 +0200
From: mohammad nabil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: karma for jakarta-site2
hi,
hope somehuman read any of my mails to jakarta
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:44:19 +0100
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Poll result] Committers, who are we?
On 4/10/02 14:49, Andrew
On Thu, 2 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:24:58 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: You guys are so funny.
Berin Loritsch says:
There are other dirty
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I've been saying this long enough. . MERGE MERGE MERGE!
smiling
I can't help sitting here thinking about how the committers on projects
being told to MERGE MERGE MERGE must feel like two young adults whose
parents want them to get married
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
As for people shoving Maven down other people's throats, I'd like to know
where the Maven developers have been doing that. From what I can see the
Maven developers have been fairly balanced.
As I tried to point out in my parenthetical
On 29 Apr 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Date: 29 Apr 2002 14:41:20 -0400
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge
Hi,
I would like to propose ObjectRelationalBridge
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 00:41:23 -0400
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: jakarta subproject scope (was Re: Quick! convert all your
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gosh, I think I'll have to write my own programming platform one day to
avoid all this.
I thought you already did ... you mean I *cannot* write device drivers and
run them on Cocoon? Rats ...
:-)
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: General Jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PMC
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Giovanni Zorzan wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:17:00 +0100
From: Giovanni Zorzan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: possibly bug with tomcat 4 vs oracle 8.1.7 ??
we try to use JDBCStore against a
Stephen, I can help you get this set up. Please send me offline what
you'd like for:
* Description of BCEL
* Identifier and description of each component (so people can
submit bug reports against that component
* Version numbers to list in the bug database.
Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 24 Jan
+1
Craig
On 17 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Date: 17 Jan 2002 14:45:26 -0500
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general at jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: POI Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:27:54 -0500
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta PMC bylaws change
The number of PMC seats will be set at seven. Annually, all
Gerhard,
They went to the moderator queue, and I just OK'd them. We'll fix the
mail permissions to let these go directly shortly.
Craig
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Gerhard Froehlich wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:02:02 +0100
From: Gerhard Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Edson Alves Pereira wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:21:55 -0500
From: Edson Alves Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Groupware Website Recommendations
Sourceforge.net
On 9 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Date: 09 Jan 2002 00:07:00 -0500
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general at jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Code conventions
It's only two little lines extra to include the {}'s,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
I continue to see the last 11 months as a period of progress.
+1
- Sam Ruby
Craig McClanahan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Peter Donald wrote:
Watchdog is TC specific - didn't know that ? Is it servlet/jsp specific or
tomcat specific? Could it be reimplemented over the top of Cactus or is it
tied to a specific infrastructure?
Watchdog is not Tomcat-specific - the validity tests should work
On 7 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
This whole experience has become a bit disheartening. Craig McClanahan
who is like an idol of mine said this:
We will continue to do what we've done in the past -- reject projects
that
only want the name recognition value of being under Apache,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
- Sam Ruby
P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml
and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot.
Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we?
+1 on the principle
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:27:52 -0500
From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More abuse of coding styles...
Rule #1 from The Elements of Java
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Just the JARs
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Putting aside *all* the stuff
On 15 Dec 2001, Kevin A. Burton - burtonator wrote:
Perhaps.
It might be a good idea to have a default recommendation or a global standard.
... anyway...
The most entertaining flamewars I've ever seen are atempts to gain
consensus on whether to use tabs or not, and then how many
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote:
if you want things to change, then you need to do something about it (am i
sounding like jon? ;) if you were to answer newbie questions - to the best
of your ability - then jon wouldn't have to make time to answer them.
there's something
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Danny Angus wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:51:55 -
From: Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cross site scripting
Craig wrote:
That seems like a lot of extra
, 21 Nov 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:49:36 -0800
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cross site scripting
on 11/20/01 11:54 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tim Vernum wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:30:47 +1100
From: Tim Vernum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using bzip2 for tarball
From: Daniel Rall
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Frans Thamura wrote:
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:16:01 +0700
From: Frans Thamura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Integration
Dear All,
I see there is a lot of API in Apache... Jakarta and XML
who
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:30:56 +0100
From: Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE
Ainsi parlait Kasper Nielsen :
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Peter Donald wrote:
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:21:46 +1000
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 02:16, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Because the amount of paperwork
+1
Craig
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 11:37:25 -0400
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BCEL @ Jakarta
Hi,
Markus has just informed me that he has removed the GNU regexp dependency
from
I've set up the new top-level entry. Let me know what components and
versions you would like set up, and I will do those as well.
Craig
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote:
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:15:36 +0100
From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:37:54 +0100
From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet
+1
Craig McClanahan
The first Release Candidate for Tomcat 4.0 is now available. Only serious
problems will be fixed between now and final release of Tomcat 4.0,
which is currently scheduled for September 17, 2001. A second release
candidate, if necessary, will be distributed on Thursday, September 13.
Please
Thanks for the report - I just checked in patches that will be reflected
in tonight's nightly build (and shortly on the web site as well).
For project-specific documentation like this, it would be helpful to
submit bug reports against the documentation for that project.
Craig McClanahan
On
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 7/27/01 12:08 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help me debug this stylesheet, and improve its compatibility with
site.vsl, by checking out the jakarta-site2 module and running the
xslt target. NOTE: you will need
Forwarding to STRUTS-DEV, where this kind of a report belongs. GENERAL is
for discussion of Jakarta-wide project issues, not project-specific things
like this.
Craig McClanahan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Armen Papshev [EMAIL
The Jakarta Commons package is pleased to announce the availability of
Version 1.0 releases of three packages:
* Beanutils - Generic manipulation of JavaBeans wrapped around the Java
reflection APIs, including the ability to get and set nested and
indexed properties.
* Collections - A wide
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the
existing developer and user community is like. I know that there is a large
user community, but what is the developer community like?
BSF does not have a large developer
As promised at JavaOne, the Struts project team is proud to announce the
availability of Version 1.0 (final release) of the Struts Framework. The
binary distribution is available at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/release/v1.0/
and the source distribution is available at:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, bill parducci wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
bill parducci at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The little thinghie over the latter a is Copyright by Sun...
it is LIKE it, but not the same. so i would disagree.
I wouldn't want to even _raise_ the question
+1 (back at home recovering from J1).
Craig
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote:
Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
+1
I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
Jon Stevens wrote:
Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
5 of 10 (not counting
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi Jon,
I am referring to otherwise honest people who choose to contribute
their enhancements back to the project. They create new classes but in
the process remove the names of previous authors. They do this in
good-faith as otherwise they would
Your best bet would be to ask Tomcat-specific questions like this on the
TOMCAT-USER mailing list (send an empty message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe). You'll find
thousands of people there who use Tomcat in a large variety of ways,
including as a stand alone server.
Craig McClanahan
On
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
Agreed. Mandating that the docs contained in the distribution and the
docs available on the jakarta web server match exactly is too
restrictive.
+1 -- it should be up to the project. I've got projects that do it both
ways.
However,
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
At 10:02 07.05.2001 -0700, you wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
I have asked this before but is there a need for an intermediary
directory? For example, to take an example I am familiar with, Tomcat
4.x, a
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 5/5/01 9:54 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is an important question, since the natural outcome of our
providing open source frameworks is that people will eventually provide
open source applications based on those
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Peter Donald wrote:
The fact of the matter is you would contribute to it even if you had to
pass the 12 heculean tests of power, jump tall buildings at lunch and
beat
deep blue on your breaks ... why ? It's your
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
* How are you measuring "activity"? I would guess from your statement
that you are talking about developers doing commits -- but what about
they users who just want to USE your project in their own work and could
give a rip about
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
At 11:42 12.04.2001 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
At the last PMC meeting we scheduled the next PMC meeting for Monday, 16
April 2001 at 1900 GMT. Now that daylight savings time has swapped
hemispheres, it might make sense to revisit this.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
Hi Craig,
At 11:25 12.04.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Whether or not there is a nice, easy, "all in one" download with
everything you need has absolutely nothing to do with whether binaries are
checked into CV
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
At 12:55 12.04.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
[removed text]
Why do you think that it is wrong to have binaries in CVS?
All the disadvantages you listed.
All the disadvantages Sam listed.
Sam objects to early
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Peter Donald wrote:
At 08:16 12/4/01 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
If you accept that you are in a world where interfaces that you are
depending on change frequently, then the problem to solve is optimizing the
communication paths.
I don't accept that reality.
I bet that
Tomcat 4.0-beta-3 is an update to the Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 distribution that
was released on 30 March 2001. It fixes a further security vulnerability
related to potentially exposing JSP source that was only partially
corrected in beta 2. Anyone using versions of Tomcat 4.0 earlier than the
beta 3
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 11:26 PM 3/30/2001 -0800
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the
next generation of the Tomcat servlet container,
Rockin'! So can we consider the code unfrozen, or do we want
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Willie Wheeler wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 11:26 PM 3/30/2001 -0800
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the
next generation of the Tomcat servlet container,
Rockin
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Velocity 1.0 will be released on Monday 4-2-01 (the article was published
early).
http://dcb.sun.com/practices/profiles/velocity.jsp
:-)
Congrats on your upcoming release!
And it's refreshing to see Jon type a smiley after typing the
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the
next generation of the Tomcat servlet container, at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-b2/
Tomcat 4.0 beta 2 has many new features, including:
* Tomcat 4.0 can now run web applications out of
Catching up on this thread quite late, but ...
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Vincent Massol wrote:
It's a pity if I have to change the name ... I would of course very much
prefer to keep it. But I can see your point. Let's wait for others to
comment on that.
The formal way to check Sun's
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Kuster, Egon wrote:
Thanks for the welcome. now it is time to start learning how to use turbine.
Fun.
Turbine + Jetspeed is a great combination if your application needs the
kinds of features they offer. But if the best argument for Turbine is
that "JSP sucks balls",
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 3/22/01 7:23 PM, "Peter Donald" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it couldn't from what I understand. Commons won't allow imports directly
from turbine/avalon and to try to do such a complex system generic from
start may be a bit of a PITA at this
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-9] Altuð Altýntaþ (Koç.Net) wrote:
Hi ,
i have got two contexts , one of them is VARDIYA and other one is CIS.
Two of these contexts are implemented by using session object .
You will do much better asking Tomcat-related questions on the
TOMCAT-USER
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Sam Ruby wrote:
Can we make this month's meeting on Friday? (Sorry Peter). Via IRC as Jon
has suggested...
Friday is fine for me (still 20:00 GMT?) -- please send the contact
details privately.
- Sam Ruby
Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Hey all,
[NOTICE]
Brian asked me to remind you to clean up the nightly builds so that we don't
have tons of old stuff eating up disk space.
Example:
/x2/www/jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/nightly
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/nightly
"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone chooses to duplicate a piece of code, maybe the problem is with
the way the code is written and shared.
I think in some cases, its bacause people aren't aware that the stuff
exists. Go through the Jakarta project sites,
Peter Donald wrote:
I would also like to hear from the struts bean utils. I haven't looked at
them but I presume they would be general enough (or could be made so) so
Ant2.x could use it (ie remove converter/introspector elemenets from Ant2.0
codebase).
They are -- and they have
Ted Husted wrote:
There are many packages which would make good candidates for the
library. To find a starting set, I simply looked for packages where
there was already overlap. But, if no one disagrees, let's hereby amend
the POLL to include
--
[Struts] Bean Introspection support -
"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Call it 'Rupert'.
Be careful, that name might stick. ;-)
That would be fine - forward progress! I guess the logo would be
next... :)
I mean, with Tomcat 4, nothing really guarantees that you
won't
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
