Re: [VOTE] HiveMind as a Jakarta sub-project

2004-03-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[X] +1 I support this proposal [ ] -1 I don't support this proposal [ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: questions license for site documents

2004-03-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Christopher Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You're not saying that the boilerplate text should appear as comment in every generated HTML document, are you? Yes, I am. For the same reason that it's in every Java file. Cheers, Chris Craig

Re: boilerplate LICENSE text in different formats

2004-03-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:37:48 -0500 Shapira, Yoav wrote: I have started a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LicenseFormats for boilerplate text in different formats. Cool and useful -- thanks ;) Ditto. :-) I'll try it

Re: questions license for site documents

2004-03-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 + robert burrell donkin wrote: i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be inclined to add both formulations.

Re: Using apache feather logo

2004-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting TANAKA Yoshihiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I,m Yoshi TANAKA, a member of Japanese Jakarta user's group. We're planning to make our stickers for give-aways to attendees at Java Technology Conference in Japan to be held next week. We'd like to include your feather logo into our stickers.

Re: jakarta-site karma?

2004-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In order to finally make an official mirrored release of Lucene 1.3, I need jakarta-site karma so that I can update binindex and sourceindex. Would the powers that be please grant me this? Thanks, Erik Done. Craig

Re: Differences

2004-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ted Husted wrote: Perhaps once most of the Committers are on the PMC list, we can move the administrative nonsense there again, and let the General list be the General list again :) Looking forward to it. Do not remember when good flame

Re: [License] for jars in CVS

2004-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I see what you are saying, but why is this an issue only with OGNL? Is it because of license incompatibilities? 'Cause there are other jars in CVS both Apache and non-Apache. Harish, It isn't only an issue with OGNL, it is a general issue

Re: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

2003-12-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8. The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too long without a public release. [X] +1 I

RE: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

2003-12-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -Original Message- From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release [X] +1 I

Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?

2003-12-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Craig, this is elaborate, informative and puts the issue in my perspective. May be this should be put on the website too somewhere. Here are my inferences so far... inferences ASF is a group of projects administered by the Apache

Re: Confused with PMCs, TLPs, ASF and Power?

2003-12-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Then try this: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges It aims to be a starter course on why discssions about PMCs, TLPs, Jakarta and the ASF appear, and possibly how they affect you. Be aware of the disclaimer

Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?

2003-12-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Could someone please explain the motivation behind the creation of Jakarta and how it got to where it is today? May be that would help answer some of the questions we have? -Harish These comments are going to be (like anyone's would be)

RE: Why you *want* to be on the PMC

2003-12-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Henri Yandell wrote: If all the PMC's share the same website, who is responsible for the website as a global concept. For example, the need to do mirrors. If a Jakarta-Site PMC exists, all other PMCs [jakarta sub-project based] are

Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework

2003-11-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Part of the proposal indicates the jakarta-commons is not the right home for HiveMind, as it does not fit in with the charter of the commons (too many dependencies, etc.). Even if it were proposed that Hivemind stay in jakarta-commons, I do not share Martin's

Re: Changes to the jakarta-site

2003-09-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Date: 04 Sep 2003 10:49:50 +0200 From: Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General Mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Changes to the jakarta-site Hi, I'd like to put

Re: Issues with XMLBeans proposal

2003-07-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Snipping to an issue I have with one particular comment. On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: In summary the most serious issues to this proposal are: 1. diversity of committership. I'd personally like to see 51% of the ACTIVE committership from a different company. So long as a

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

Re: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the list

2003-04-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:44:26 -0500 From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the list Currently,

Re: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects

2003-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Danny Angus wrote: Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:11:17 - From: Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects Although I've got karma I thought I should

Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects?

2003-03-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:09:14 -0500 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects? Thanks Pier. Thats a

RE: Karma request jakarta-site2

2003-02-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:33:13 -0500 From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Karma request jakarta-site2 I'd like to join the

Re: Karma request jakarta-site2

2003-02-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:12:51 -0600 From: O'brien, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Karma request jakarta-site2 Was trying to add my name to the

Re: Licensing again.

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Timothy Halloran wrote: Date: 10 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0500 From: Timothy Halloran [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Licensing again. Does this mean the ASF has taken away the

Re: Licensing again.

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Ellis Teer wrote: Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:41:54 -0800 From: Ellis Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Licensing again. Ditto plus some, Seeing the license issues discussed

Re: [Fwd: Maven as a top-level apache project]

2003-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Dan Diephouse wrote: 4. Can ASF Projects use Sun BCL licensed products? Yes, but ASF can't distribute them. Each product you download from Sun's java.sun.com web site has a license that you have to agree to in order to download that JAR. In the case of several

Re: No reply from root

2003-01-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jeffrey Dever wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:22:01 -0500 From: Jeffrey Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No reply from root I am the release prime for the commons-httpclient

Re: Forum Software.

2003-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote: Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:52:12 +0100 From: Robert Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Forum Software. Then how do you answer the following issues:

Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto

2003-01-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:31:32 -0800 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto Alex McLintock wrote: At 17:41 21/01/03, you

Re: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property

2002-12-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:21:03 -0500 From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property Gump is now two years old. It has had contributions

RE: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Tim Vernum wrote: Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:12:37 +1100 From: Tim Vernum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Short Apache licence for source files From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [xdocs] Bug report (fwd)

2002-11-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote: Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:17:09 -0500 (EST) From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xdocs] Bug report (fwd) I originally mentioned this on the

Re: karma for jakarta-site2

2002-10-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, mohammad nabil wrote: Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:39:51 +0200 From: mohammad nabil [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: karma for jakarta-site2 hi, hope somehuman read any of my mails to jakarta

Re: [Poll result] Committers, who are we?

2002-10-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:44:19 +0100 From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Poll result] Committers, who are we? On 4/10/02 14:49, Andrew

Re: You guys are so funny.

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:24:58 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: You guys are so funny. Berin Loritsch says: There are other dirty

Re: You guys are so funny.

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I've been saying this long enough. . MERGE MERGE MERGE! smiling I can't help sitting here thinking about how the committers on projects being told to MERGE MERGE MERGE must feel like two young adults whose parents want them to get married

Re: You guys are so funny.

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] As for people shoving Maven down other people's throats, I'd like to know where the Maven developers have been doing that. From what I can see the Maven developers have been fairly balanced. As I tried to point out in my parenthetical

Re: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge

2002-05-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 29 Apr 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote: Date: 29 Apr 2002 14:41:20 -0400 From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge Hi, I would like to propose ObjectRelationalBridge

Re: jakarta subproject scope (was Re: Quick! convert all your projectsto maven!)

2002-05-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 00:41:23 -0400 From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: jakarta subproject scope (was Re: Quick! convert all your

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

2002-02-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Gosh, I think I'll have to write my own programming platform one day to avoid all this. I thought you already did ... you mean I *cannot* write device drivers and run them on Cocoon? Rats ... :-) Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

2002-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600 From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED], Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: General Jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PMC

Re: possibly bug with tomcat 4 vs oracle 8.1.7 ??

2002-01-29 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Giovanni Zorzan wrote: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:17:00 +0100 From: Giovanni Zorzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: possibly bug with tomcat 4 vs oracle 8.1.7 ?? we try to use JDBCStore against a

Re: BCEL project bug databas

2002-01-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Stephen, I can help you get this set up. Please send me offline what you'd like for: * Description of BCEL * Identifier and description of each component (so people can submit bug reports against that component * Version numbers to list in the bug database. Craig McClanahan On Thu, 24 Jan

Re: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta

2002-01-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 Craig On 17 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: 17 Jan 2002 14:45:26 -0500 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general at jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: POI Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta PMC bylaws change

2002-01-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:27:54 -0500 From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta PMC bylaws change The number of PMC seats will be set at seven. Annually, all

Re: commit mails not send

2002-01-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Gerhard, They went to the moderator queue, and I just OK'd them. We'll fix the mail permissions to let these go directly shortly. Craig On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Gerhard Froehlich wrote: Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:02:02 +0100 From: Gerhard Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General

RE: Groupware Website Recommendations

2002-01-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Edson Alves Pereira wrote: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:21:55 -0500 From: Edson Alves Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Groupware Website Recommendations Sourceforge.net

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 9 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: 09 Jan 2002 00:07:00 -0500 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general at jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Code conventions It's only two little lines extra to include the {}'s,

Re: Commons Validator Packaging/Content

2002-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: I continue to see the last 11 months as a period of progress. +1 - Sam Ruby Craig McClanahan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Commons Validator Packaging/Content

2002-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:56:30 +0100 From: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Commons Validator Packaging/Content At 19:00 07.01.2002 +0100, Paulo

Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage

2002-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Peter Donald wrote: Watchdog is TC specific - didn't know that ? Is it servlet/jsp specific or tomcat specific? Could it be reimplemented over the top of Cactus or is it tied to a specific infrastructure? Watchdog is not Tomcat-specific - the validity tests should work

Re: crushed

2002-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 7 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: This whole experience has become a bit disheartening. Craig McClanahan who is like an idol of mine said this: We will continue to do what we've done in the past -- reject projects that only want the name recognition value of being under Apache,

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote: - Sam Ruby P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we? +1 on the principle

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:27:52 -0500 From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: More abuse of coding styles... Rule #1 from The Elements of Java

Re: Just the JARs

2002-01-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Just the JARs Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Putting aside *all* the stuff

Re: Coding style addition

2001-12-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 15 Dec 2001, Kevin A. Burton - burtonator wrote: Perhaps. It might be a good idea to have a default recommendation or a global standard. ... anyway... The most entertaining flamewars I've ever seen are atempts to gain consensus on whether to use tabs or not, and then how many

Re: Comment for Apache.org

2001-12-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: if you want things to change, then you need to do something about it (am i sounding like jon? ;) if you were to answer newbie questions - to the best of your ability - then jon wouldn't have to make time to answer them. there's something

RE: Cross site scripting

2001-11-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Danny Angus wrote: Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:51:55 - From: Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cross site scripting Craig wrote: That seems like a lot of extra

Re: Cross site scripting

2001-11-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
, 21 Nov 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:49:36 -0800 From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cross site scripting on 11/20/01 11:54 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Using bzip2 for tarball

2001-11-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:30:47 +1100 From: Tim Vernum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using bzip2 for tarball From: Daniel Rall

Re: Integration

2001-11-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Frans Thamura wrote: Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:16:01 +0700 From: Frans Thamura [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Integration Dear All, I see there is a lot of API in Apache... Jakarta and XML who

Re: Distributing the JSSE

2001-11-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:30:56 +0100 From: Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE Ainsi parlait Kasper Nielsen :

Re: Distributing the JSSE

2001-10-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Peter Donald wrote: Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:21:46 +1000 From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 02:16, Kasper Nielsen wrote: Because the amount of paperwork

Re: BCEL @ Jakarta

2001-10-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 Craig On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote: Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 11:37:25 -0400 From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCEL @ Jakarta Hi, Markus has just informed me that he has removed the GNU regexp dependency from

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

2001-09-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I've set up the new top-level entry. Let me know what components and versions you would like set up, and I will do those as well. Craig On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:15:36 +0100 From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

2001-09-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Done. On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 19:38:09 +0100 From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:37:54 +0100 From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet +1 Craig McClanahan

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

2001-09-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
The first Release Candidate for Tomcat 4.0 is now available. Only serious problems will be fixed between now and final release of Tomcat 4.0, which is currently scheduled for September 17, 2001. A second release candidate, if necessary, will be distributed on Thursday, September 13. Please

Re: Possible bug in web.xml

2001-08-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Thanks for the report - I just checked in patches that will be reflected in tonight's nightly build (and shortly on the web site as well). For project-specific documentation like this, it would be helpful to submit bug reports against the documentation for that project. Craig McClanahan On

Re: Enhancement to jakarta-site2 -- XSLT stylesheet equivalent tosite.vsl

2001-07-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: on 7/27/01 12:08 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please help me debug this stylesheet, and improve its compatibility with site.vsl, by checking out the jakarta-site2 module and running the xslt target. NOTE: you will need

Struts install - error in SilverStream install doc (fwd)

2001-07-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Forwarding to STRUTS-DEV, where this kind of a report belongs. GENERAL is for discussion of Jakarta-wide project issues, not project-specific things like this. Craig McClanahan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Armen Papshev [EMAIL

Three Commons Packages Released

2001-07-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
The Jakarta Commons package is pleased to announce the availability of Version 1.0 releases of three packages: * Beanutils - Generic manipulation of JavaBeans wrapped around the Java reflection APIs, including the ability to get and set nested and indexed properties. * Collections - A wide

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the existing developer and user community is like. I know that there is a large user community, but what is the developer community like? BSF does not have a large developer

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.0 (Final) Released

2001-06-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
As promised at JavaOne, the Struts project team is proud to announce the availability of Version 1.0 (final release) of the Struts Framework. The binary distribution is available at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/release/v1.0/ and the source distribution is available at:

Re: doinking around with a logo

2001-06-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, bill parducci wrote: Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: bill parducci at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The little thinghie over the latter a is Copyright by Sun... it is LIKE it, but not the same. so i would disagree. I wouldn't want to even _raise_ the question

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

2001-06-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 (back at home recovering from J1). Craig On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote: Was there a post with a [VOTE] header? +1 I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week. Jon Stevens wrote: Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project. 5 of 10 (not counting

Re: Theft of authorship

2001-06-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Hi Jon, I am referring to otherwise honest people who choose to contribute their enhancements back to the project. They create new classes but in the process remove the names of previous authors. They do this in good-faith as otherwise they would

Re: Tomcat as webserver

2001-05-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Your best bet would be to ask Tomcat-specific questions like this on the TOMCAT-USER mailing list (send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe). You'll find thousands of people there who use Tomcat in a large variety of ways, including as a stand alone server. Craig McClanahan On

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

2001-05-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

2001-05-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: At 18:36 08.05.2001 +1000, you wrote: At 08:31 8/5/01 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 08:36 08.05.2001 +1000, you wrote: At 06:09 7/5/01 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Unfortunately half projects use build for (1) and half use it for (2). My

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

2001-05-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: Agreed. Mandating that the docs contained in the distribution and the docs available on the jakarta web server match exactly is too restrictive. +1 -- it should be up to the project. I've got projects that do it both ways. However,

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

2001-05-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: I have asked this before but is there a need for an intermediary directory? For example, to take an example I am familiar with, Tomcat 4.x, a damn good project I might add, has a build/ directory and a dist/ directory where dist/ is a copy

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

2001-05-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: At 10:02 07.05.2001 -0700, you wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: I have asked this before but is there a need for an intermediary directory? For example, to take an example I am familiar with, Tomcat 4.x, a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta-Turbine-Jyve

2001-05-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: on 5/5/01 9:54 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this is an important question, since the natural outcome of our providing open source frameworks is that people will eventually provide open source applications based on those

Re: Binaries in CVS

2001-04-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Sam Ruby wrote: Peter Donald wrote: The fact of the matter is you would contribute to it even if you had to pass the 12 heculean tests of power, jump tall buildings at lunch and beat deep blue on your breaks ... why ? It's your

Re: Binaries in CVS

2001-04-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: * How are you measuring "activity"? I would guess from your statement that you are talking about developers doing commits -- but what about they users who just want to USE your project in their own work and could give a rip about

Re: Next PMC meeting times?

2001-04-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: At 11:42 12.04.2001 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: At the last PMC meeting we scheduled the next PMC meeting for Monday, 16 April 2001 at 1900 GMT. Now that daylight savings time has swapped hemispheres, it might make sense to revisit this.

Re: Binaries in CVS

2001-04-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: Hi Craig, At 11:25 12.04.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Whether or not there is a nice, easy, "all in one" download with everything you need has absolutely nothing to do with whether binaries are checked into CV

Re: Binaries in CVS

2001-04-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: At 12:55 12.04.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: [removed text] Why do you think that it is wrong to have binaries in CVS? All the disadvantages you listed. All the disadvantages Sam listed. Sam objects to early

Re: Binaries in CVS

2001-04-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Peter Donald wrote: At 08:16 12/4/01 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: If you accept that you are in a world where interfaces that you are depending on change frequently, then the problem to solve is optimizing the communication paths. I don't accept that reality. I bet that

Tomcat 4.0-beta-3 Released (SECURITY VULNERABILITY)

2001-04-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Tomcat 4.0-beta-3 is an update to the Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 distribution that was released on 30 March 2001. It fixes a further security vulnerability related to potentially exposing JSP source that was only partially corrected in beta 2. Anyone using versions of Tomcat 4.0 earlier than the beta 3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

2001-03-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote: Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 11:26 PM 3/30/2001 -0800 I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the next generation of the Tomcat servlet container, Rockin'! So can we consider the code unfrozen, or do we want

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

2001-03-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Willie Wheeler wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote: Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 11:26 PM 3/30/2001 -0800 I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the next generation of the Tomcat servlet container, Rockin

Re: Sun Article On Velocity

2001-03-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: Velocity 1.0 will be released on Monday 4-2-01 (the article was published early). http://dcb.sun.com/practices/profiles/velocity.jsp :-) Congrats on your upcoming release! And it's refreshing to see Jon type a smiley after typing the

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

2001-03-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the next generation of the Tomcat servlet container, at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-b2/ Tomcat 4.0 beta 2 has many new features, including: * Tomcat 4.0 can now run web applications out of

Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF

2001-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Catching up on this thread quite late, but ... On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: It's a pity if I have to change the name ... I would of course very much prefer to keep it. But I can see your point. Let's wait for others to comment on that. The formal way to check Sun's

RE: Struts, velocity, turbine, jetspeed, lions, tigers and bears...oh my

2001-03-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Kuster, Egon wrote: Thanks for the welcome. now it is time to start learning how to use turbine. Fun. Turbine + Jetspeed is a great combination if your application needs the kinds of features they offer. But if the best argument for Turbine is that "JSP sucks balls",

Re: New Subprojects

2001-03-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: on 3/22/01 7:23 PM, "Peter Donald" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No it couldn't from what I understand. Commons won't allow imports directly from turbine/avalon and to try to do such a complex system generic from start may be a bit of a PITA at this

Re: session question

2001-03-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-9] Altuð Altýntaþ (Koç.Net) wrote: Hi , i have got two contexts , one of them is VARDIYA and other one is CIS. Two of these contexts are implemented by using session object . You will do much better asking Tomcat-related questions on the TOMCAT-USER

Re: PMC meeting agenda

2001-03-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Sam Ruby wrote: Can we make this month's meeting on Friday? (Sorry Peter). Via IRC as Jon has suggested... Friday is fine for me (still 20:00 GMT?) -- please send the contact details privately. - Sam Ruby Craig McClanahan

  1   2   >