:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war ~ John Adams
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thank you for your report. It has been added to
the board agenda.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not rec'd.
On Aug 9, 2005, at 6:16 AM, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
Brian posted in his CLA around 1st of July (that's 5 weeks ago). Is
there any sign of it?
I've emailed Jim directly but got no response.
Thanks,
Simon
-
On Apr 6, 2005, at 7:36 PM, Ian F. Darwin wrote:
The question:
I vote in support of the proposal to move Tomcat to an Apache Top
Level Project as
detailed in the attached Resolution.
[ ] +1 Vote in support
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Vote against
+1
On Mar 20, 2005, at 7:20 PM, Bill Barker wrote:
And, yet, all of the complaints about the article have been from
people that aren't involved with Tomcat development ;-).
I think that's an unfair statement... does that fact diminish the
accuracy of what anyone is saying? I would also wager that
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 20, 2005, at 7:20 PM, Bill Barker wrote:
And, yet, all of the complaints about the article have been from
people that aren't involved with Tomcat development ;-).
I think that's an unfair statement... does that fact diminish
On Mar 21, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
That would be kind of impossible to do, logically :)
But I would agree that other companies have occasionally
crossed lines that should not have been crossed, both
companies associated with ASF projects and external
companies
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else
On Mar 21, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, what are your feelings that we (Tomcat developers),
propose to the ASF to be nominated as TLP?
Personally, I think the Tomcat community is large enough and
healthy enough to warrant change to a TLP.
I know that some of you will think (since
and developed by communities, not individuals.
Terms such as lead or main do cause harm to the community
and have always been actively avoided.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
Tim O'Brien wrote:
Henri, I'm not -1, you can send it if you want. You are (after all)
Jakarta. :-)=20
Of course, that's just as wrong as the concept of Leading Contributor
or Main Developer :)
--
===
Jim
for, whether they are huge F100 companies,
or small 1-man consulting firms.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone
I've thought about this for a long time, and this is where
I stand.
As many people know, this has been a somewhat recurring issue,
with JBoss blurring and obscuring the facts regarding Apache
Tomcat, in such a way that it appears that they, JBoss, control
and direct the development of Tomcat. Now
would like to request that this be changed to:
Tomcat 5.0 (The Apache Software Foundation)
in both the press release (pdf url above) and the forthcoming June
2005 issue.
Thanks,
Henri Yandell
V.P., Apache Jakarta
--
===
Jim
Henri Yandell wrote:
I hope that as much discussion went into this when JBoss
released their PR regarding Apache-Tomcat integration :)
PS: I will work on getting the site updated.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
with 'Apache'
as well, eg: Apache Tomcat, Apache Axis, etc...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else
On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:25 PM, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
ASF should publicly applogize, and as a sign of friendship with OSS,
do something to help jBoss, such as help with J2EE certification, or
help with code or something.
This statement jumped out at me like a tiger.
The suspicious might read the
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
http://theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=22337#101159
http://theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=22337#101173
I call on Greg Stein to resign.
Why?
--
===
Jim Jagielski
If Cliff is able to communicate BEA's preference, and the LGPL Piccolo
issue is resolved, it seems like we're heading somewhere. Attracting
new committers is easier when the project is already under incubation.
Agreed.
-
To
Does it make sense that someone is nominating himself
(or re-nominating himself) for membership?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ASF] NOTICE: comprehensive list of ASF members and committers
Hello. You are rec'ing this email because you are a committer on one (or
more) of the ASF projects and/or a member of the ASF. I am currently
baby seals. Murder is a bit higher up... I've got those charts
around here *somewhere*...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
23 matches
Mail list logo
