on 12/12/01 2:05 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakarta projects use
Anakia, but I have not found any macros in Jakarta-site2 that reference
a Change Log or To Do list.
Paul Spencer
+1.
Feel free to add some...
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
on 12/12/01 3:19 PM, Kevin A. Burton - burtonator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Enlighten me... what are the benefits of an XML based changelog... besides the
ability to XSLT it into html (I don't think this is necessary).
Eewww...XSLT...
How about being able to transform it into a ChangeLog.txt
on 12/10/01 4:43 PM, Scott Tavares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope!!! jon is a complete ASSHOLE! If YAFF happens it is jon's fault!
Put the responsibility where it belongs... on jon. It's him that keeps
creating these commotions needlessly.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jon.html
p.s.
on 12/10/01 6:14 PM, Scott Tavares [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also know that I haven't contributed to the Jakarta project in close to
three years now because you insulted me one too many times.
Lame excuse. Life is full of people you may not like. If you use that as
your excuse for not
Wow. It would be really great if you wrote an email that made some logical
sense.
-jon
on 12/9/01 3:57 AM, Frans Thamura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,,
Do you know where the list for comment the apache.org web site..
Is there a team that responsible for managing the projects of
on 12/5/01 11:27 PM, Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a case in point, I would like to point out EJB CMP as an example of
design-driven technology which may very well look really stupid in
another few years, especially given its atrociously slow mutation rate.
If anyone who was
on 12/6/01 2:05 PM, Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time I talked to Eduardo (the spec lead for JSP) he still had never
written a real webapp with it.
Lemmings!
Isn't the JDK 1.4's logging API story similar?
The guys did not pay that much attention to Ceki's remarks, did
on 12/3/01 9:14 PM, achawathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Friend ,
You should be aware of N tier logic which is developed by Sun
Microsystems . MIcrosoft are just on the brink of it by adapting the three
tier logic for it .
Hope that you give a good look to Java , Jsp and ejb
Sigh.
-jon
-- Forwarded Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 17 Nov 2001 02:05:53 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cross Site Scripting holes abound
Mailer: SecurityFocus
::: Summary
Over a year and a half since CERT issued
warning on Cross Site Scripting, most dynamic
on 11/20/01 11:54 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, Jon is asking for container-based solutions -- I guess that
requiring the use of Strut tags for all your output qualifies. :-)
Craig
Sigh. I am *not* asking for a container based solution.
Because something got
on 11/21/01 1:26 AM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know of any generic solutions to the getStrippedHtml() or
removeScriptTag() methods you propose - but are they still necesary if you
do the getEscapedHtml() processing on everything?
Craig
The issue is whether or
and C?
gio
Jon Stevens wrote:
Sadly, it seems that the Java world really hasn't taken the cross site
scripting issues seriously. Only a few projects within Jakarta have really
made an effort to fix bugs and that was after they were pointed out by
others. It also seems that most
on 11/20/01 7:43 AM, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
filter everything for public consumption its safest, its not just SCRIPT
you have to watch out for its also pernicious things like P
onMouseOver=foo(); which may not work often, but you don't want it to
*ever*, and who is to say which
on 11/20/01 11:51 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Within the standard Jakarta documentation tools, i.e. jakarta-site2 and
anakia, is their a way to build a keyword index?
Paul Spencer
You can use the tools available to help you create it, but there is nothing
specifically there
on 11/20/01 10:58 AM, Steve Giovannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the interest of breaking the chains of my cross site scripting
ignorance, I'm assuming that the offending SCRIPT needs to be blocked
from POST or GET requests made by users to JSP/Servlets on the target
server?
Nope. The
on 11/20/01 12:43 PM, Steve Giovannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to look at this from the standpoint of how does the
offending script get on your site in the first place. Let's say you
have a discussion board and you want to make sure no one puts nasty suff
in SCRIPT tags in
on 11/19/01 11:26 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the PMC have standard definitions Alpha, Beta, Release Candidate,
and Release? If so, then what are they? Specifically I am looking for
the difference relative to:
o Overall stability
o Enhancement to Functionality
o
Sadly, it seems that the Java world really hasn't taken the cross site
scripting issues seriously. Only a few projects within Jakarta have really
made an effort to fix bugs and that was after they were pointed out by
others. It also seems that most of the examples are for other languages
(PHP,
on 11/17/01 11:07 AM, Dave Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turbine is coupled to Java. It's not easy to use any particular
database (e.g., an entire help section on how to integrate Oracle).
With BOX, you set the default database with a straightforward
configuration file:
on 11/16/01 8:58 PM, Dave Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sql
select
* FROM WIC.FOURNIS
WHERE COD_CLIENT=?
ORDER BY NOM_FOURNIS
/select
using
value-of expr=#WIC_CLIENT/
/using
container name=results/
/sql
Why the heck would you want to
Hey all,
In an effort to cut back on the amount of time I spend at Jakarta (you can
start cheering now) and to give Jason van Zyl more control.
I no longer have cvs admin privs and Jason has taken over that duty for me.
So, if you need something done with regards to the avail file, as Jason.
on 10/31/01 5:41 PM, horwat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The J2EE PetStore application was created as an educational tool to showcase
features available in a J2EE architecture. True, it has many more EJB's then
required in a normal application but these EJB's are meant to be examples of
how the
on 11/1/01 11:59 PM, Matt Egyhazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps sun should make it more clear that petshop is not a benchmark and is
instead a multi-faceted example of the possibilities offered by j2ee. i
suppose they could rework it and create a benchmark out of it...
microsoft is
on 10/31/01 1:19 PM, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/compare/petshop.asp
Its not a very fair comparison (suprise suprise) but from a quick look at
the source code, it seems MS achieve their performance gains by not using
EJBs :-)
Ok. Now that is
on 10/31/01 1:54 PM, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be interesting to have a Java competition - trying the various
different techniques, tools and frameworks and seeing how each of them stack
up to .NET. Comparing code complexity, performance etc.
e.g. with beans or EJBs,
on 10/27/01 12:27 PM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When doing site updates, please don't forget to update before starting
editing. For example, Berin reverted many changes to the news and binary
pages.
Remy
Even though it was partially the fault of CVS that f*cked up in
Why am I not surprised?
The funny thing is that even in this down economy and with all the free
(better?) alternatives that are out there, people will actually still pay
for this stuff!
We should put a paypal link on the Jakarta homepage and donate the money to
AIDS research or some other
+1
Please note: people from other projects are giving their vote...while the
voice is appreciated, that vote doesn't really count since it is only the
PMC's decision to include new projects.
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
on 10/23/01 7:38 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/01 5:55 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/01 2:38 PM, Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/23/01 10:40 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to distribute the JSSE jars
on 10/23/01 10:40 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to distribute the JSSE jars with the Turbine Development Kit but I'm
not entirely sure if it's legal. On the JSSE website it says that the
binary implementation may be used royalty-free as part of commercial
applications,
on 10/22/01 6:22 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works fine, but there is a problem with the imports being placed in the
wrong place when there is text right after the package declaration. I asked
Tom Copeland to fix this for me and he said he would get to it today. It
does the
on 10/22/01 7:05 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like their project, the only thing I'm concerned about it is here:
http://bcel.sourceforge.net/licensing.html
Markus has agreed to change the licensing strictly over to the AL.
Big
on 10/22/01 9:27 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to ask if anyone sees a problem for using AspectJ
(http://www.aspectj.org) with Cactus ? More specifically the license is MPL
(http://aspectj.org/servlets/AJSite?channel=downloadsubChannel=license). Is
that a problem ? I
on 10/22/01 10:56 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only ran it on a small body of source, but Scarab is a good test bed.
Scarab is something like 256 classes...most of it is Torque generated
though...
-jon
-
To
http://importscrubber.sourceforge.net/ant.html
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.importscrubber.ImportScrubberTask
Given that this isn't an official Jakarta project, shouldn't the tool choose
another namespace?
It isn't even listed here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/external.html
-jon
on 10/21/01 8:40 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://importscrubber.sourceforge.net/ant.html
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.importscrubber.ImportScrubberTask
Given that this isn't an official Jakarta project, shouldn't
on 10/19/01 5:50 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1... Just remove the word ASP between decline and market in the little
boxed text :)
Pier
Why? That was a direct quote.
That isn't M$ ASP, it is 'application service provider'.
-jon
on 10/18/01 12:41 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should remove the last paragraph, otherwise +1.
Done.
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 10/18/01 12:18 AM, Ranjit Mathew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's sadder still, Jon, that you quote Paul almost
verbatim in your document New Project Proposals
(http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html) and
#1. It is a quote made in a public forum.
#2. I also used a quote from Sam and
Sam,
I have integrated the changes that you suggested, please take a look.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Here is my proposal for new project creation guidelines. I have not linked
it into the main site until I can get 3 +1 votes from the PMC and 0 -1 votes
from the PMC.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html
I will accept any patches against this document and/or direct commits from
PMC
on 10/17/01 9:36 PM, Tim Vernum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I first read the original mail my reaction was Someone with
a homeless project looking for an owner.
I must be tainted from having been around here so long. I see right through
his proposal.
In fact Paul's most recent mail says
on 10/17/01 9:24 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing, but from a community standpoint, the ASF would rather incorporate
projects that are not backed up by a self-sustained open-development
community... Look at our last addition, Log4J, it was an IBM project, they
dumped it,
on 10/17/01 6:08 AM, Paul Ilechko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever Jon is or isn't is not my place to say, but I think I was pretty
clear that we are NOT looking to dump a project on Apache, that we ARE
continuing to work on ASPizer and support it, and have described the
commitment we
on 10/17/01 9:35 AM, Ceki Gulcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakarta is not a dumping ground for .bomb projects. Untactful?
Yes. Accurate statement? Yes.
Let me point out that I tried tact the first time I responded:
There is nothing in your proposal discussion WHY you would want to give this
on 10/17/01 1:21 PM, Endre Stølsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon's last post is just so very much better. Why not start with something
like that? It's still pretty direct, but in a much nicer, somewhat
diplomatic way.
I did start nice. How come you choose to ignore that?
I'm not. It's
on 10/17/01 12:42 PM, Paul Ilechko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I responded to all your points, then you decided it was time to
insult us, at which point it no longer seemed worthwhile responding to you at
all. Fortunately, not everyone on the list has the same attitude problem.
You
on 10/17/01 12:24 PM, Paul Ilechko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, this is not what we said. We said we cannot fund taking the product to
market, which is vastly different than being able to fund development. We are
primarily a consulting company, and we have used ASPizer for a client project.
on 10/17/01 4:29 PM, Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calling someone's hard-worked project .bomb, without even
trying to get informed about it.
Does this qualify?
It is a .bomb project though. I have an entire corporation of them (yes, I
am the proud owner of a rather large worthless
I don't have any more time for this. End of discussion. I'm not going to
change my mind.
-1
My suggestion:
Put your project on SourceForget.net. There is another project there that is
now hugely successful that we also rejected here and which I hosted for a
number of years on my own dime, the
on 10/11/01 7:24 AM, Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anakia is the product
many jakarta projects use.
Anakia is the product that many Jakarta projects use...as well as the main
http://www.apache.org site. It has proven to be quite useful and is fully
documented:
There is nothing in your proposal discussion WHY you would want to give this
to the ASF other than because you think you have a cool product. Nor is
there anything that suggests what the developer community is like (ie:
people who would be working on the product) nor the user community and the
on 9/30/01 8:08 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iCalander is not supported in current version (1.3a2) of Jetspeed,
although I am not sure why.
I think it clearly states the reason why on the link that Sam posted.
-jon
on 9/23/01 7:20 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it turns out I do not have permission.
If only you had read the Jakarta-site2 documentation...
Anyway, for the future, you now have permission.
-jon
-
To
on 9/21/01 3:45 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to add the release and nightly builds of Jetspeed to
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html. How should I accomplish
this task?
Paul Spencer
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html
-jon
on 9/14/01 12:23 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't you want to preserve your history?
History will be preserved in the repo it is currently in.
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
on 9/11/01 8:55 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's one
piece that someone of root authority needs to do, and I'll coordinate that
part.
Including getting a list of people who need commit access.
-jon
-
To
Hey Ted,
What is your status?
-jon
-- Forwarded Message
From: Tal Dayan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:32:10 -0700
To: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED], lucene dev lists.sourceforge.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance
Hi Jon,
Where are we
on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for doing the website but I would have preferred someone who has already
done it and has everything set up on his machine (I don't and will have to
learn the mechanism before so it'll take a some time). To summarise, there
are 2
on 9/7/01 2:17 PM, Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+lia href=/~raphael/jetspeed/Jetspeed/a/li
-1
Why is this in his home directory and not in the main jakarta site?
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 9/6/01 7:45 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Perhaps the right fix here is to create a jakarta-cactus subproject.
Agreed... I would kindly ask to the Jakarta-Commons people, to vote on
making Cactus become a top-level subproject of
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010902/n02312723.html
Doh! That sucks for all those people and their jobs. :-(
Even worse are the people who purchased the software, built a ton of code
(or companies) on top of Netobjects and now are shit out of luck.
-jon
Sigh, I have been saying this for well over a year now...
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5801cid=1031241
Next I need to just convince people that JSP sucks and I'm sure that Gartner
will eventually write an article about it.
:-)
-jon
on 8/23/01 4:23 PM, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try convincing someone to use Torque instead of their $200,000 EJB server
it
is like trying to drive your hand through a 6' wall of steel...
Or Torque instead of TopLink, which I'm hearing has 5/6 digit pricing now,
and is very
on 8/20/01 2:09 AM, Endre Stølsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe he thought that this could be Jakarta's (configuration) problem?
Or maybe he's just asking about clarification whether this is a bug or a
feature?
Then he should ask on the viewcvs mailing list because Jakarta's system is
on 8/16/01 4:20 AM, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are on the topic of ViewCVS, there seems to be a slight config
issue when you do a select for diffs. For example, look at this page
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-ant/build.xml?r1=1.173
The coloured diffs link and
on 8/15/01 7:08 PM, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is this, some sort of advocacy forum? I can read this sort of crap on
slashdot if I want. IMHO, All this stuff is outside the charter of this
list. Even a flamefest about jars in CVS, or project directory layouts or
something
on 8/15/01 8:42 PM, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you like a patch for that
page?
:-)
Conor
I would rather let you just commit it yourself, but a patch will do.
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
on 8/15/01 10:26 PM, Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject saids it all - else checkout http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/
We know.
Fixed now.
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
on 8/14/01 7:30 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 8/13/01 4:53 PM, Alex Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would change if Apache used GPL?
I would quit.
I would follow Jon.
Pier
I'm starting to picture lemmings here
Maybe people can write some proposals about talks that don't center around
JSP. Last year was nuts...something like 50+ talks on JSP alone. Ewww.
-jon
* 2002 JavaOne(sm) Conference Call for Papers
Sun Microsystems is seeking proposals for sessions for the
JavaOne(sm) Conference, to be held
on 8/13/01 10:54 AM, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send Stallman an e-mail right now.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He will tell you that Apache
*is* Free Software.
No need to fill his inbox with crap.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
The Apache License, Version 1.1.
This is
on 8/13/01 4:53 PM, Alex Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would change if Apache used GPL?
I would quit.
:-)
I let you decide if that is a good thing or not. :-)
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I love it.
-jon
-- Forwarded Message
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:54:33 -0400
To: velocity-user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Veltag JSP Taglib
Tonight I committed into the contrib section of CVS a mini-project
called
Can someone explain to me what the heck web services are so that I can
decide whether or not this is even worthwhile to learn about?
http://sdc.sun.com/briefings/agenda.cgi?eventkey=5100
I'm guessing it is fancy marketing foo about SOAP/XML-RPC or it is about how
to build a website with JSP.
on 8/8/01 8:34 AM, Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an important part of optimizing your value Chain when dealing with
everything from SMEs to large scale enterprises. ;)
HAHAHAHA
I'm sure it will increase my ROI on my ENV when my SME hits my JSP and pukes
all over my RTFM.
on 8/8/01 9:59 AM, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the stuff I've read about for WebServices comprise
UDDI, SOAP, and WSDL.
The three combined provide a way to automatically discover remote resources
that my webapp can use and then actually use it.
I'm surprised no one has
on 8/7/01 5:47 AM, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It takes a couple
iterations of an API to get it right, and Sun foolishly decided to include
the API without the real world testing and feedback.
I'm sure it isn't the first time. :-)
-jon
on 8/7/01 5:47 AM, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully the information presented here will help you. I would stay
away from JDK1.4 logging, and use either LogKit or Log4J which are of
equal quality--but slightly different focuses and underlying concepts.
+1
Log4J also has a
This entire email is *exactly* why I push for version numbers in jar files.
Yes, classpath was empty
Yes, ant 1.3
-jon
on 7/27/01 3:01 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 7/27/01 12:08 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
In an effort to cut down on the amount of email I get and spend more time on
Scarab, I'm asking for volunteers to take over the duty of moderating the
emails sent from people who are not subscribed to the mailing list. Note:
people who are subscribed don't get moderated.
The duty is
on 7/27/01 12:08 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help me debug this stylesheet, and improve its compatibility with
site.vsl, by checking out the jakarta-site2 module and running the
xslt target. NOTE: you will need to make sure that your Ant install
includes the
on 7/25/01 1:38 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
burtonator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But they haven't approached us... And I believe the first step should be
done by them..
snip
Not according to them. They said that they approached Jakarta about 1 - 1.5
years ago.
on 7/20/01 12:14 AM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heads up ... the old process for updating the Jakarta web site no longer
works, since the CVS repositories are no longer present on daedalus. It's
too late tonight, or I'd actually figure out how to update fix -- but
wanted
on 7/19/01 6:51 PM, Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are icarus and daedelus right? I just tried icarus and it was no
better. But you're probably on to something, maybe something got goofed
up in the transition to the new CVS server. (I didn't actually get this
email in my
on 7/16/01 5:44 AM, Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added direct links to archive on all projects so that people like me who are
used to marc.theaimsgroup.com on many Apache projects stop wondering where
turbine-user archive.
Some projects had such a link, so I extended it to
on 7/16/01 1:24 PM, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i ping i get that
cvs.apache.org is 64.208.42.41
jakarta.apache.org is 64.208.42.42
Update your DNS entries...
nslookup cvs.apache.org
Server: takahe.whichever.com
Address: 157.22.245.4
Non-authoritative answer:
on 7/14/01 4:12 PM, Oleg V Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello ,
Can anybody explain me mail send/retrieval connections turning at
apache.org? I try to connect to the apache.org with pop3/smtp mail
client directly and via ssh, but I have troubles anyway... What do I
wrong?
I check
on 7/13/01 1:42 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday, it took 14.5 hours to do cvs updates across the various
projects, and that is with 13 cvs updates cancelled due to timeout. Today
looks worse, so I've cancelled it after 13.5 hours and 15 timeouts. Had I
not cancelled it, it
on 7/10/01 9:36 AM, Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding Reply-to on
all the jakarta lists?
Please read
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
before asking why it's a problem.
-1
That document is one persons
PROTECTED]
Hello, please take a look at the page now. I have updated it to add more
information. If there is anything else I can do for you, please let me know.
Thanks,
-jon stevens
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
http
on 7/10/01 2:09 PM, Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
my vote, FWIW, is to leave things as they are.
--
joe
HELL YES!
That essay conveys *exactly* what I was thinking. I love it. Thanks for the
link. I'm saving that one
ASP-JSP Translation...
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5092884,00.html
I'm sure that this was one of Sun's goals all along when they created JSP.
Unfortunately, the goal didn't seem to be more than that...like making JSP a
really good and innovative technology.
:-)
-jon
--
If
It might become a news article on a website...
http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1291
Lol!
Can someone please correct that CollabNet is not a Jakarta Project, but
instead a Company? :-)
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
on 7/5/01 5:52 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, one day I'll change it (also because it generates 70% of the traffic on
daedalus!)
And because CollabNet has to pay for that...
-jon
-
To unsubscribe,
on 7/3/01 7:19 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the
Edwin,
on 6/21/01 7:16 AM, Edwin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
org.apache.regexp 1.2 is pretty much broken. It has some
major flaws since 1.0 and they are still not addressed.
See http://nagoya.betaversion.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Regexp
for a list of bugs (BTW none of them is
on 6/21/01 12:23 PM, Vaishnav, Kunal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea of where I am going wrong?
You are posting to the wrong mailing list.
Post to the commons list.
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
on 6/21/01 2:24 PM, Edwin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought submitting bug reports is also an important
way to support Open Source.
s/Open Source/Anything/
It isn't specific to OSS to submit a bug report...
The code should be something like this:
Submit a patch to the regexp-dev
on 6/21/01 3:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wow! I'm glad I was browsing jakarta-general today - interesting and
enlightening discussion.
Re: influencing Sun: be sure to participate (or send feedback, or whatever
they let you do) in JSR's of interest like Ceki was
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
