Re: [VOTE] Remove SVN restrictions
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 02:50 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-* groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter under the assumption that they are moving to having their own PMCs. Tapestry is already within its own auth group. [ ] +1 [ ] -1 +1. Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: adding a link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons?
Excellent! Sanjiva. On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 19:44 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: Here you go: http://commons.apache.org/ Hen On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Henri Yandell wrote: I'll give it a shot. A link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons, XML Commons and WS Commons seems pretty fair. Hen On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/13/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know Jakarta Commons isn't a TLP but considering the commons.apache.org space is vacant how about addins a blurb about the Jakarta Commons. You'd have to sell this idea across the ASF, not just at Jakarta, and you'll likely get more than a little push back. That space was also the realm of Apache Commons when it existed. -- Martin Cooper It's the convention that you use your domain as your package. The Jakarta Commons code is in the package org.apache.commons, not org.apache.jakarta.commons. Also a number of times I've seen s stack trace and simply reveresed the package name parts and pasted it into a browser in an attempt to find out more about the code. I'm thinking a blurb at the bottom to the effect of: hr/ If you came here looking for Java code in the org.apache.commons packages then go see the a href=http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/;Apache Jakarta Commons/a page. -- Sandy McArthur He who dares not offend cannot be honest. - Thomas Paine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: adding a link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons?
Hmmm. Can we remove the useless blurb at the top and just have commons.a.o rechartered to be a virtual front for commons.*.a.o? Sanjiva. On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 08:43 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: Excellent! Sanjiva. On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 19:44 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: Here you go: http://commons.apache.org/ Hen On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Henri Yandell wrote: I'll give it a shot. A link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons, XML Commons and WS Commons seems pretty fair. Hen On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/13/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know Jakarta Commons isn't a TLP but considering the commons.apache.org space is vacant how about addins a blurb about the Jakarta Commons. You'd have to sell this idea across the ASF, not just at Jakarta, and you'll likely get more than a little push back. That space was also the realm of Apache Commons when it existed. -- Martin Cooper It's the convention that you use your domain as your package. The Jakarta Commons code is in the package org.apache.commons, not org.apache.jakarta.commons. Also a number of times I've seen s stack trace and simply reveresed the package name parts and pasted it into a browser in an attempt to find out more about the code. I'm thinking a blurb at the bottom to the effect of: hr/ If you came here looking for Java code in the org.apache.commons packages then go see the a href=http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/;Apache Jakarta Commons/a page. -- Sandy McArthur He who dares not offend cannot be honest. - Thomas Paine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OneCommunityProposals - thoughts?
+1 for the overall direction. I'm happy to vote en masse or piecemeal. I like the direction of Jakarta. Sanjiva. On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 17:02 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: Thought I'd bring Stephen's wiki page up: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/OneCommunityProposals It wraps a lot of what we've been talking about, and I'm wondering what people think now that there's a nice summary to let it be visualized. Just to get a feeling for what this applies to, the following projects are heading TLP-ward: * Cactus * HiveMind * JMeter * Slide * Tapestry Which means the future Jakarta list will be: * BCEL * BSF * Commons * ECS * HttpComponents * JCS * ORO * POI * Regexp * Taglibs nee WebComponents * Turbine * Velocity So anymore thoughts? Shall we vote on the wiki page as a whole, rather than individual items? Shall we refine it the wiki page? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Naming for new Jakarta subproject
I've come to understand that a name Apache FOO does not violate the trademark FOO. As such, I don't think there's any problem with Apache Silk. Sanjiva. On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 00:49 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: Apache Silk it is: [17]Apache Silk [ 0]Apache Web Bricks [ 0]Apache Web Commons (branding issue with Commons) [ 3]Apache Web Components [ 0]Apache Web Parts (conflict with Microsoft and sf.net) 20 +1 votes with 1 abstainer. So now we can finish the proposal, get it voted on and start with the fun stuff. Okay. I've been unable to get this resolved - for the following reasons: * Segue's SilkXxx web testing suite seems to clash on the trademark. * General lack of response on PRC on the trademark issue. We lack decision making on the grey line at the moment - but after having this sit on the back burner for many months I'm of the opinion that we clash too much with the Segue trademark. * Jakarta Web Components matches Jakarta Http Components in pattern and fits the proposals I've made on restructuring Jakarta (ie: they're both groupings). So I'd like to suggest we go ahead with Jakarta Web Components. Any thoughts? And sorry for taking so long to bring this up, it's been on my todo list since ApacheCon. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Jakarta Http Components
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 18:03 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote: So, period of comments now over, let's go ahead and vote on the creation of a Jakarta Subproject named Http Components with the following initial charter: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-httpclient/NewProjectCharter [X] +1 Any chance of sneaking in an NIO-based HTTP connector into this project? Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
