+1
Vadim
On Mar 21, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on
the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic.
Since Regexp may not have enough PMC members active, this vote will be
held by lazy consensus. If you
On Mar 12, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Ian Darwin i...@darwinsys.com wrote:
Six months have passed and there hasn't been much activity.
Should we revisit this now? Someone recently offered to contribute some
code on regexp-user@, but it didn't
On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
Someone recently offered to contribute some code on regexp-user@,
Daniel -
Unless I miss something... regexp-user is dead though? Was replaced by general
a good while ago.
Vadim
On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
With RegEx in Java since 1.4, I do not see the need for these libs aside from
legacy application support. I consider mothballing a service to the community
at large: please, join us in the 21st century, port your RegEx code to Java
1.4. ;)
On Aug 15, 2010, at 12:16 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
This is a vote (or more correctly, three independent votes) to move
Jakarta ECS, Jakarta ORO and Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based
on the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic.
There is one unreleased bugfix on trunk
On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
one development and one notifications list. For background including
timing, anticipated benefits and some
sebb wrote:
Thanks to those who voted so far.
At least two more PMC votes are needed - please!
S///
On 25/09/2007, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created what I hope will be JMeter 2.3 final in the directory:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist
Site/Docs are here:
Henri Yandell wrote:
So the question is; is the above direction worth discussing,
Not sure about moving to incubator part -- but overall -- yes, IMHO it is worth
discussing.
Vadim
or should we just go with the Commons TLP.
Hen
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 3/14/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
Also I think I need to update
headers as per [3], is that correct?
You also need a NOTICE file [3]
Updated license headers, added NOTICE to zip/tar.gz.
The NOTICE file is missing the copyright
Henri Yandell wrote:
This 'how we release' conversation has been bouncing around the ASF
for 4 months now, the above is my best grok on the summary. I've not
seen anyone yet speaking in favour of a view that we should have a
vote on the idea of releasing and then someone does it when they can.
sebb wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=520239
Log:
set eol-style
Modified:
jakarta/site/docs/site/news/news-2007-q1.html (contents, props
changed)
By the way, when changing the SVN eol-style to native, if possible, it
is best to do this on a platform which has the
The Jakarta Regexp team announces availability of the Jakarta Regexp 1.5
release.
This is a maintenance release containing several bug fixes as well as
performance optimizations for several classes of expressions. Complete
list of changes is available at the website:
opinion.
Best regards
Henning
Vadim Gritsenko schrieb:
Henri Yandell wrote:
3) Creating the actual files that are going to be released and voting
on them. There's pressure to go this way, but it's not the policy yet.
Vote has passed, so now actual files are made, and are available
sebb wrote:
On 19/03/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
resulting files. It's quick sine no actual software testing need to be
performed, just verify that zip unzips and tar untars.
I think one also needs to check that:
* that the various signature files are present and correct
sebb wrote:
Surely voting on creating a tag (if this is necessary)
Absolutely. Any release tag must be a community decision == vote is required.
is completely different from voting on a release?
Not to me.
Voting on a release (on a tag) signifies that software is in a state where it
can
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Ehh...Obviously I'm alone in my opinion so I'll shut up now, just
wanted to make sure I got my two cents in.
Make that two of us. ASF today indeed contains much more Administratium (thanks
Dave, great link!) than it used to.
Vadim
Martin Cooper wrote:
Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection.
Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd procedures?
For example: community votes for a release, RM tags a release (and prepares
files), pmc rubber-stamps it with 'ACK'
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection.
Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd
procedures?
Not me. We don't have absurd procedures, so
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal
protection.
Who says there is no way to combine legal
The vote to release passes with +1s from:
Vadim Gritsenko
Henning Schmiedehausen
Daniel F. Savarese
sebb
Henri Yandell wrote:
There are (to my knowledge) three types of vote/release styles that
have been happening at the ASF.
1) A vote to do a release, with no sign of release files
Henri Yandell wrote:
snip/
PS I noticed that you forgot to vote this year :-)
http://marc.info/?l=jakarta-generalm=11231425543
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Henri Yandell wrote:
3) Creating the actual files that are going to be released and voting
on them. There's pressure to go this way, but it's not the policy yet.
Vote has passed, so now actual files are made, and are available at the same
location [1].
Vadim
[1]
sebb wrote:
The LICENSE and NOTICE files are now in the zip and jar, but they show
up for me as License and Notice. Ideally they should be in capitals.
They are:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/public_html/regexp $ tar -tzf
jakarta-regexp-1.5-dev.tar.gz | grep dev/[^dsx]
jakarta-regexp-1.5-dev/LICENSE
sebb wrote:
Also I think I need to update
headers as per [3], is that correct?
You also need a NOTICE file [3]
Updated license headers, added NOTICE to zip/tar.gz.
The LICENSE and NOTICE files ought to go into the jar as well, as the
jar may well be used on its own.
Added both files to
Hi All,
With 5 recent bug fixes [1], one *major* speed improvement for {m,n} closures
[2], with other various optimizations to compiler and runtime, and with previous
release published sometime back in 2005 [3], now is the best, or at the very
least, really good time to to cut next, 1.5
Apache Wiki wrote:
+ * Inactive - No activity, no one watching it. Candidate for dormancy.
+ * Maintenance - No activity, someone watching it.
Henri,
Regexp
+ See ORO.
+
According to your definition, Regexp should be in Maintenance state.
Vadim
Julius Davies wrote:
...
I had to explain that Commons-SSL just sits on top of the JSSE and JCE
to try and make working with SSL and Java easier. Your point about
the name is a good one.
The counterpoint to name argument. Just single example, I'm sure there are many
more: commons-logging
Henri Yandell wrote:
* ECS, ORO, Regexp to be moved to a label of Inactive.
Think of Regexp as of low maintenance project. There are several issues reported
against it, and some of those can be (relatively) easy fixed and new release can
be pushed out.
It would be disappointing if such
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the
response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid
accounts. We can discuss means
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can
discuss means and mechanisms of moving to emeritus and back, but
Henri Yandell wrote:
So, period of comments now over, let's go ahead and vote on the creation
of a Jakarta Subproject named Http Components with the following initial
charter:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-httpclient/NewProjectCharter
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
+1
Vadim
Felipe Leme wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
projects, but still, i must ask this to the FtpServer developers (i
don´t know who they are).
Hmm, there is a Maven-generated link that says Who We Are :-)
I didn´t find this information on the site.
Here is the link I mentioned:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
jakarta's been self consciously shrinking over the last few years (it's
just too big and too complex) with a lot of old sub-projects graduating
to lop level status. it's more difficult now to persuade people that
new
David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
The Jakarta Regexp team announces availability of the Jakarta Regexp
1.4 release.
Are there any plans for consolidating ORO and Regexp ?
I had none. Unless you want to do it.
Vadim
The Jakarta Regexp team announces availability of the Jakarta Regexp 1.4
release.
This is a maintenance release containing several (eleven, to be presice)
bug fixes accumulated since the 1.3 release almost 2 years ago. Complete
list of changes is available at the website:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try out current svn (r232390) version [4] and test for any
regressions, and vote for a release.
Vote passes with 4 +1s [1], I'm cutting the release.
Vadim
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11238848995r=1
Hi All,
With several recent bugfixes [1,2], and with previous release published almost
two years ago [3], I think it is a good time to make a next, 1.4 release of the
Jakarta Regexp.
Please try out current svn (r232390) version [4] and test for any regressions,
and vote for a release.
My
Ian F. Darwin wrote:
The question:
I vote in support of the proposal to move Tomcat to an Apache Top
Level Project as
detailed in the attached Resolution.
[ X ] +1 Vote in support
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
That seems low; how did you come up with that number?
Some regexps over httpd logs. See
http://www.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/index.html
Vadim
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:37:49 -0500, Vadim Gritsenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I'm continually asked
Henri Yandell wrote:
So low can be very good, as it means people are using the mirrors.
Ever looked into getting logs from the mirrors Vadim?
No; I believe it will be hard to impossible to do, as those mirrors are
independent entities and might not want anybody messing with theirs log files.
As
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
snip/
Then we can solicit volunteers
from the PMC to be committers for each project to ensure that each
has at least three. Volunteering means you agree to review and
adddress patches and bug reports, vote on releases, etc., but
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 11:11, Brett Porter wrote:
is not ASF License compliant?
If yes, than I would really hate to have to point you at
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 13:56, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 11:11, Brett Porter wrote:
is not ASF License compliant?
If yes, than I would really hate to have to point you at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven-plugins
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:56 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
The problem, AFAIU, is that this Maven's code now has to become LGPL
licensed itself, due to LGPL license requirements. And ASF
repositories can't contain LGPL code. So the answer is to pull
(quickly) this code
Henri Yandell wrote:
My suggestion would be:
jakarta/tomcat/tomcat-5
jakarta/tomcat/connectors
jakarta/tomcat/servletapi
ie) we'd delineate on definite subproject lines, rather than having
projects with multiple directories in the jakarta-root.
I'm not against servletapi (or any) being their own
Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
[X] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Henri Yandell wrote:
...
However, the aim for this modification is to bring it in line with reality
and not future plans and we've never had a PMC member who was not a
committer. Every (loose) description I've seen of a PMC describes it as
the active committers to a project.
Yup.
So I'd like to
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resources (Unofficial) gets my vote,
works for me.
Ditto
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
[ ] +1 I support this proposal
[ ] -1 I don't support this proposal
[X] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal
Comments :
I'm not up-to-date on HiveMind :-)
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe,
Marcus Sundman wrote:
Would it be possible to have symlinks like
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/news-latest.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/elsewhere-latest.html
that would point to the latest news?
we'd then risk people losing long term urls. probably getting apache to
do
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
The last really good (by some people's definition, I guess) flame war happened
a couple of years ago ... and caused the subscription count on this list to
drop from 4000 to 1500 in less than a month.
I wonder what that was? :-)
It is currently 718.
Hope it will
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi again!
The Slide community is just about to make a first beta release for a
2.0 version. As I have never done any releases on Apache Jakarta what
is the normal distribution process? What are the steps taken once the
Slide committers have decided the release
Ted Husted wrote:
Perhaps once most of the Committers are on the PMC list, we can move the administrative nonsense there again, and let the General list be the General list again :)
Looking forward to it. Do not remember when good flame worth reading
last happened on this list.
Vadim
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Good morning to all,
The log4j developers are pleased to announce that the Board of
Directors of the Apache Software Foundation unanimously passed a
resolution for the creation of the Apache Logging Services project. A
copy of the resolution can be found at:
for any I see].
Ok, here it is:
* MS Windows XP - Vadim Gritsenko (came with company's notebook)
* Linux - Vadim Gritsenko (desktop)
Vadim
Hen
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
I added a simple poll for Jakarta developers.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/os.html
Please
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Yes, I win!
http://cvs.apache.org/~rubys/committers.html
Ok, that page makes me laugh. =)
While in good mood, may be you could apply
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 ?
Vadim
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/12/3 12:20 PM, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Done. Attached to the bug report:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=4029
Done.
As an added bonus, I updated the build system to use more current standards.
ant
Tom Copeland wrote:
Done:
http://cvs.apache.org/~tcopeland/bad_imports_20_nov_02.htm
How about adding xml-* projects into the list?
Vadim
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Lavandowska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Jakarta General List
58 matches
Mail list logo
