On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 23:32 +0100, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'd like to note my opposition. I don't have the same vision as you do
and do not wish to be distracted by 100 irrelavant emails a day about
Commons ABCD.
I'm glad Henri posted that reorganization things were being discussed.
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:48 +0100, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
that'd only leaves POI in jakarta
did you have a point there? :-)
thanks for highlighting my bad grammar (it's past my bed time)
the point was the bit you snipped :)
preserving jakarta as a special umbrella for poi seems more than
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by StephenColebourne:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/OneCommunityProposals
The comment on the change is:
Create page for one community proposals
New
I'd like to note my opposition. I don't have the same vision as you do
and do not wish to be distracted by 100 irrelavant emails a day about
Commons ABCD.
I'm glad Henri posted that reorganization things were being discussed.
I would have preferred that he posted a more detailed message as
For the record, I wrote this to try to sum up where discussions have got
to and to provide some vision as to where the end result might be.
Checking mailing lists tonight indicates that POI has quite a healthy
set of messages as is. I didn't see much development discussion (an
indicator of
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by StephenColebourne:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/OneCommunityProposals
The comment on the change is:
Add 'no forced merger' clause
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm glad Henri posted that reorganization things were being discussed. I
would have preferred that he posted a more detailed message as I think others
would likely be opposed to such forms of social engineering. Things evolve
the way the evolve
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Checking mailing lists tonight indicates that POI has quite a healthy set of
messages as is. I didn't see much development discussion (an indicator of
community) but I could be mistaken.
There's not a lot of conversation on poi-dev; though
