Hi, On Mon, 26 May 2003 09:57:39 -0400 (Subject: Re: [PATCH] Instruction to create a patch to vendors.xml) "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems fair. Perhaps add "ill-formed patches will be rejected". > > -Andy You are right. Also, Danny and Steven are right. Even though I've shown (and other ones) the way to make a change to vendors.html, there was no one (no company) who created a patch for it and no one posted here in this mailing list. So, I've come to change my mind that the "sanity check" (remain difficulties to change vendor.html) is still necessary. It's a decent barrier to discourage sales and marketing people to use apache.org as a marketing vehicle. Please discard the patch I once submitted, "[PATCH] Instruction to create a patch to vendors.xml" in the top of this tree. Very sorry. Sincerely, ----------------------------------------------------- Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
