On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 10:48 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC.
Sandy,
I meant ALL of us. The whole PMC. Not a selected group, which eliminates
the problem of having to come up with a selection criteria.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 16/03/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Poorly explained by me. The file would be deleted once it had served its
purpose.
Oh OK my misunderstanding, that changes things a bit.
An alternative is a mail thread to which everyone must answer to
remain on the PMC - however a file in
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC.
Why not just send out e-mail to the PMC members asking them if
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] convinced me that this was half wrong though
- we shouldn't be worrying about cleaning up
Hi Hen,
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can
list themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in
that list will result in removal from the PMC. If it goes well we could
consider doing it periodically, or just when it feels like the numbers
are
Ahh, you're American. You do realize Europeans take like 5 month vacations?
I don't care a whole lot so long as I'm exempted because I commit in
spurts like once every 2-3 years ;-)
-Andy
Henri Yandell wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive
committers and
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16/03/2006 08:14:08:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC. If it goes well we could consider
doing it
2006/3/16, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahh, you're American. You do realize Europeans take like 5 month vacations?
Hum, 5 weeks in France
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Henri Gomez wrote:
2006/3/16, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahh, you're American. You do realize Europeans take like 5 month vacations?
Hum, 5 weeks in France
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Nope, English.
4 week of holiday there minimum, though I'm sure I'd be on 5 or 6 if I'd
stayed - it tends to increase inversely to the amount you have time to
take.
Hen
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Ahh, you're American. You do realize Europeans take like 5 month
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Hen,
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can
list themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in
that list will result in removal from the PMC. If it goes well we could
consider doing it periodically,
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16/03/2006 08:14:08:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the
Hola,
Generally +1 to what Henri said, with the following exception:
Poorly explained by me. The file would be deleted once it had served its
purpose.
There's no overwhelming need to delete it, and it could be a useful
historical record. I'd say keep it in SVN.
Yoav
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Nah, we're into a realm where legitimacy is defined by whatever we decide
to do. Technically our charter says we need a 75% of the PMC vote to
remove someone - we're not going to get that and it's not a rule that
scopes.
We probably
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] convinced me that this was half wrong
On 16/03/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Scenarios are...
Danny proposes to de-select Robert (just an example mate, I'd never do
that:-).
a)No votes cast. Robert goes.
b)Some people vote +1 but Robert votes -1. He gets to stay.
Nope, he gets to leave. A -1 from the
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] convinced me that this was half wrong
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Hen,
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can
list themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in
that list will result in removal from the
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A thread on [EMAIL
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A thread on [EMAIL
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
Firstly, thanks for these emails Sandy. It's a good wake up call for me,
and I should explain why I'm being so anti-community.
We're out of sync with the ASF - I'm pretty confident that the view that
was reached a few years ago that Jakarta should not be a huge umbrella has
not changed. If
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC.
Why not just send out e-mail to the PMC members asking them if they want to
remain active?
We have done this
there are no written down rules that I know of for what a PMC
member should do (that'd be unnecessary bureacracy).
The written rules for the ASF are
http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html.PMCs would make their lives
a whole lot simpler if they would facilitate human participation and
On 3/17/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC.
Why not just send out e-mail to the PMC members
26 matches
Mail list logo
