[draft-2] SD Magazine: request for change
Added thanks for the award. Removed the text about companies not being contributors as it is nitpicking. Added note about Apache Tomcat, though I left it open to their discretion to avoid detracting from the main issue, that of the concept of a leading contributor. Hen === To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 5.0 error in JOLT announcement Hi Kate, I'd like to thank SD/Jolt on behalf of the Jakarta community for the JOLT Productivity Winner award for Tomcat 5.0. Media recognition of the work the Tomcat community puts in is always very welcome. I'm also writing to let you know about a serious error on your JOLT product excellence awards press release because I am concerned it might be reproduced in your forthcoming June 2005 issue: http://www.sdmagazine.com/pressroom/jolt_winners_2005.pdf The release incorrectly attributes Apache's Tomcat 5.0 product to The Apache Jakarta Project and leading Tomcat contributor JBoss. There is one big problem with this attribution for us, Apache does not have a concept of leading contributors. It is completely out of sync with the very philosophies that lie at the heart of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), as there are 70 committers to the Tomcat codebase, many of whom are employed by other companies or contribute individually. We would like to request that this be changed to: Tomcat 5.0 (The Apache Software Foundation) in both the press release (pdf url above) and the forthcoming June 2005 issue. Officially the name of the product is Apache Tomcat 5.0 and not just Tomcat 5.0, but I will leave it to your discretion as to whether you'd like to prefix Tomcat with Apache or not, as the subsequent mention of the ASF is fine. Many thanks, Henri Yandell V.P., Apache Jakarta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [draft-2] SD Magazine: request for change
Henri Yandell wrote: Specifically to Remy/Mladen, does this seem acceptable to you with your JBoss hats on? Personally I don't care. If those things bother you guys, do what ever you wish. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [draft-2] SD Magazine: request for change
While not directly involved with Tomcat, some code I have written via commons probably is included in Tomcat distros. My comment is simply that I found the pdf description rather distasteful and definitely worthy of gentle correction. We all have lines that we don't want to see crossed, and each person has a line in a different place. Simply put, this crossed my line. +1 to sending the mail Stephen - Original Message - From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Added thanks for the award. Removed the text about companies not being contributors as it is nitpicking. Added note about Apache Tomcat, though I left it open to their discretion to avoid detracting from the main issue, that of the concept of a leading contributor. Hen === To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 5.0 error in JOLT announcement Hi Kate, I'd like to thank SD/Jolt on behalf of the Jakarta community for the JOLT Productivity Winner award for Tomcat 5.0. Media recognition of the work the Tomcat community puts in is always very welcome. I'm also writing to let you know about a serious error on your JOLT product excellence awards press release because I am concerned it might be reproduced in your forthcoming June 2005 issue: http://www.sdmagazine.com/pressroom/jolt_winners_2005.pdf The release incorrectly attributes Apache's Tomcat 5.0 product to The Apache Jakarta Project and leading Tomcat contributor JBoss. There is one big problem with this attribution for us, Apache does not have a concept of leading contributors. It is completely out of sync with the very philosophies that lie at the heart of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), as there are 70 committers to the Tomcat codebase, many of whom are employed by other companies or contribute individually. We would like to request that this be changed to: Tomcat 5.0 (The Apache Software Foundation) in both the press release (pdf url above) and the forthcoming June 2005 issue. Officially the name of the product is Apache Tomcat 5.0 and not just Tomcat 5.0, but I will leave it to your discretion as to whether you'd like to prefix Tomcat with Apache or not, as the subsequent mention of the ASF is fine. Many thanks, Henri Yandell V.P., Apache Jakarta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [draft-2] SD Magazine: request for change
I think this is great. More inline... On Mar 20, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: Added thanks for the award. Removed the text about companies not being contributors as it is nitpicking. Added note about Apache Tomcat, though I left it open to their discretion to avoid detracting from the main issue, that of the concept of a leading contributor. Hen === To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 5.0 error in JOLT announcement Hi Kate, I'd like to thank SD/Jolt on behalf of the Jakarta community for the JOLT Productivity Winner award for Tomcat 5.0. Media recognition of the work the Tomcat community puts in is always very welcome. I'm also writing to let you know about a serious error on your JOLT product excellence awards press release because I am concerned it might be reproduced in your forthcoming June 2005 issue: http://www.sdmagazine.com/pressroom/jolt_winners_2005.pdf The release incorrectly attributes Apache's Tomcat 5.0 product to The Apache Jakarta Project and leading Tomcat contributor JBoss. There is one big problem with this attribution for us, Apache does not have a concept of leading contributors. It is completely out of sync with the very philosophies that lie at the heart of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), as there are 70 committers to the Tomcat codebase, many of whom are employed by other companies or contribute individually. We would like to request that this be changed to: Tomcat 5.0 (The Apache Software Foundation) in both the press release (pdf url above) and the forthcoming June 2005 issue. Officially the name of the product is Apache Tomcat 5.0 and not just Tomcat 5.0, but I will leave it to your discretion as to whether you'd like to prefix Tomcat with Apache or not, as the subsequent mention of the ASF is fine. I'd actually gently push as we want this to be named Apache Tomcat 5.0. Officially, the name of the project is Apache Tomcat 5.0, and not just Tomcat 5.0, and we'd appreciate the change if that was possible. :) Well done! geir Many thanks, Henri Yandell V.P., Apache Jakarta Aw, spell this out. You want this to be as impressive as it can be for this : Henri Yandell Vice President, Apache Jakarta Project The Apache Software Foundation :) geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [draft-2] SD Magazine: request for change
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 20:40 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote: Hi Kate, I'd like to thank SD/Jolt on behalf of the Jakarta community for the JOLT Productivity Winner award for Tomcat 5.0. Media recognition of the work the Tomcat community puts in is always very welcome. I'm also writing to let you know about a [serious] error on your JOLT product excellence awards press release because I am concerned it might be reproduced in your forthcoming June 2005 issue: I would drop serious +1 http://www.sdmagazine.com/pressroom/jolt_winners_2005.pdf The release [incorrectly] attributes Apache's Tomcat 5.0 product to The Also the incorrectly +1 Apache Jakarta Project and leading Tomcat contributor JBoss. There is one big problem with this attribution for us, Apache does not have a concept of leading contributors. It is completely out of sync with the very philosophies that lie at the heart of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), as there are 70 committers to the Tomcat codebase, many of whom are employed by other companies or contribute individually. We would like to request that this be changed to: request sounds a bit harsh ...what about see +1 Tomcat 5.0 (The Apache Software Foundation) in both the press release (pdf url above) and the forthcoming June 2005 issue. Officially the name of the product is Apache Tomcat 5.0 and not just Tomcat 5.0, but I will leave it to your discretion as to whether you'd like to prefix Tomcat with Apache or not, as the subsequent mention of the ASF is fine. ...always play nice on the first contact. +1 sometimes less says more :) am i right in thinking that the importance of pushing Apache Tomcat now is about trademark issues? (one neat way of diffusing this the whole issue might be for the attribution to be corrected but a quote given by remy of jboss) - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
