Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a
Turbine
policy and get all the
Jon Stevens wrote:
Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine
At 07:54 16.05.2001 -0400, you wrote:
Jon Stevens wrote:
Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project
Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine
policy and get all the projects
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine
policy and get all the projects to sign their name on it.
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/deprecation.html
+1
Comments?
Nothing controversial
At 03:38 15/5/01 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me
start one. I seem to be good at that. :-)
What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and
migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just
